• We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.

unmerged(26083)

Second Lieutenant
Feb 22, 2004
163
0
Original Gamer said:
Italy cant survive allied navies without some improved navel bomb. Your navy isnt much by itself.

1.06 n/n I did just fine with my pre-war naval bombers. I had two stacks of three naval bombers and they did a very good job sinking the RAN in the med. Later I upgraded to basic nav bombers. Navy is no good though. You avoid contact at all costs.
 

unmerged(14102)

Field Marshal
Jan 27, 2003
5.515
0
Visit site
ITA going solo to conquer is always a challenge.

YUG is good game.

NOR is a good challenge to continue to exist without joining the allies.

TUR IMHO is only fun if you load up as fascist and go on a re-unite the empire spree.

CHI makes for a challenging game, particularly if you provoke the SOV into DoW [assuming you survive JAP]. That's a lot of units on the board then.
 

Dragonheart

Colonel
2 Badges
Jun 26, 2002
815
3
  • Europa Universalis IV
  • Hearts of Iron IV: Cadet
MegaPIMP said:
As Turkey I had 24 divisons in all those mountain provinces with lvl 5 forts and the russkies just rolled over me! :eek:

So much for grabbing Egypt and Iraq...

How can this happen? I had no forts and just 12 units on the border but mountain troops as the bulk of my troops were engaged in Greece and middle east. Later on i invaded and managed to take all mountain provinces so all that oil was mine :D. But i did no further advance as i had to cover only 3 provinces (all mountain).

My game with turkey Core 0,81 was rocking... i never had such an exiting game, lots of action, and for a very long time very balanced. Btw i was part of axis.
 

unmerged(18256)

Captain
Jul 15, 2003
321
0
Well, i really enjoyed being Brazil in 1.05c, conquered a lot of allied land in Indokina.

Won't do much good now though, with the logistic penalty..