Full readme for 1.2

[Confucius Rex]

The frontiers of Argentina and Chile are wrong, the patagonia was free during that time under Mapuche rule, but both countries claimed sovereignty over that territory, in 1843 Chile founded Punta Arenas, in 1881 both countries had a treaty when they established the modern borders.

This is a french map of 1862, showing a "no man's land"

anyway, great patch

It was like that before, but the problem was that the Chile and Argentina AI never bothered to colonize Patagonia.

 

[Andrelvis]

It was like that before, but the problem was that the Chile and Argentina AI never bothered to colonize Patagonia.

They couldn't because only powers can colonize.

 

[YossarianLives]

- Added a decision 'Miskatonic University' for NEN

I can only hope the next patch contains a subsequent "Form R'lyeh" event chain .

 

[Andrelvis]

Why have the plurality-reducing effects been removed from inventions?

 

[Al. I. Cuza]

Why have the plurality-reducing effects been removed from inventions?

Seems like it.

 

[Andrelvis]

Seems like it.

Yes, but my question is why.

 

[Al. I. Cuza]

Yes, but my question is why.

As plurality isn't nearly as powerful as it was in 1.1, I don't think it really matters anyhow.

 

[kaspar42]

attack value is only for attacker and defend value for defender, with each value giving +10% extra damage dealt.

Does that mean artillery is useless for the defender?

 

[Al. I. Cuza]

Does that mean artillery is useless for the defender?

Pretty much, yes.

 

[unmerged(45977)]

I'm really disappointed that bureaucrat promotion hasn't been fixed in this patch. It basically hurts you for being literate, which is ridiculous for obvious reasons.

 

[unmerged(197879)]

Looks like quite a list.

 

[kaspar42]

Does that mean artillery is useless for the defender?

Pretty much, yes.

Hmm. It would be nice to get an official answer on that, as it seemed likely that artillery has been treated as a special case.

 

[Al. I. Cuza]

Hmm. It would be nice to get an official answer on that, as it seemed likely that artillery has been treated as a special case.

Iirc they actually answered it as I said when they first posted the change.

 

[Buladelu]

I remember getting precious ban point for saying that Paradox add-ons look like Paradox patches. You see now why I say that, ye almighty moderator?!

 

[Al. I. Cuza]

I remember getting precious ban point for saying that Paradox add-ons look like Paradox patches. You see now why I say that, ye almighty moderator?!

I don't get the connection to what we were talking about

 

[RedRalphWiggum]

I remember getting precious ban point for saying that Paradox add-ons look like Paradox patches. You see now why I say that, ye almighty moderator?!

No, have no idea what you are talking about. Care to explain?

 

[kaspar42]

Iirc they actually answered it as I said when they first posted the change.

Do you remember which thread it was?

 

[Al. I. Cuza]

Do you remember which thread it was?

I know Johan was the one who posted it. But where... No idea.

 

[unmerged(84846)]

Searched through the changelist but im not sure - Has the bug when you take over a colony and are unable to turn it into a state because of the bureaucrats culture? (iirc all new immigrants into the province become that one bureaucrat POP culture)

 

[gamer42_au]

Searched through the changelist but im not sure - Has the bug when you take over a colony and are unable to turn it into a state because of the bureaucrats culture? (iirc all new immigrants into the province become that one bureaucrat POP culture)

According to change log

Pops promoting to bureuacrats of accepted culture will not auto-assimilate into non-accepted.

This should have the desired effect that you can develop a pool of primary/accepted culture bureaucrats in colonies with the right parameters in place.