Fuel strain on Logistics?

[Poopfaust]

1) I am assuming I read the WIKI correctly - does Fuel require Logistics to get it to the units that need Fuel?

2) Is Logistics used for (a) Manpower losses, (b) Equipment losses, (c) Supplies, and (d) Fuel (if applicable)?

3) Does Fuel cost more Logistics to move than Manpower and Equipment and Supplies? Or are all of them equally weighted by unit as far as their strain on Logistics?

I am playing Old World Blues and something is bugging me with the Robots. I apologize for this somewhat 'basic' question, but I forget a lot of stuff because everything keeps changing.

Thank you.

 

[walt526]

1. You don't need LOG to get fuel to your units. All a LOG support company does is reduce supply usage by 10% and fuel usage by 5% (for each level--through research, you can improve LOG four times, so total of -40% supply and -20 fuel). A unit without a LOG will still be fueled when supply is available.

2. Supplies and fuel, as described above.

3. Each division has a fuel cost and a supply cost, which LOG reduces as described above. Each supply zone has a maximum number of supply units that it can support and each country has a fuel level determined by oil+refineries less usage (subject to a maximum capacity). Supplies and fuel don't compete for transit or whatever.

 

[Poopfaust]

Hello Walt. I think I wrote my question poorly. But you touched on my central question in the second sentence of #3.., I think.

Supplies and fuel don't compete for transit or whatever.

Are you saying that FUEL does NOT drain the 's Supply network (logistics/roads, etc..,)? Only SUPPLIES draw on the Supply network?