• We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.

BalticM

First Lieutenant
17 Badges
Oct 31, 2017
286
181
  • Europa Universalis IV: Cossacks
  • Crusader Kings III: Royal Edition
  • Crusader Kings III
  • Imperator: Rome
  • Europa Universalis IV: Dharma
  • Europa Universalis IV: Rule Britannia
  • Europa Universalis IV: Cradle of Civilization
  • Europa Universalis IV: Third Rome
  • Europa Universalis IV: Mare Nostrum
  • Europa Universalis IV
  • Europa Universalis IV: Common Sense
  • Europa Universalis IV: El Dorado
  • Europa Universalis IV: Res Publica
  • Europa Universalis IV: Call to arms event
  • Europa Universalis IV: Wealth of Nations
  • Europa Universalis IV: Conquest of Paradise
  • Europa Universalis IV: Art of War
Here is my proposal for France potential provinces for next update. It should be well balanced map :)


1. PROVINCES OF FRANCE

France.png


I've used historical provinces of Kingdom of France and some smaller divisions - bailliages & seneschals as main base for most provinces, also geographical definitions (Upper & Lower) to cut some provinces in half.

Normandy.jpg

Before French Revolution Normandy had 7 administrative divisions - Grand bailliages:
  • Grand bailliage of Rouen
  • Grand bailliage of Caux
  • Grand bailliage of Evreux
  • Grand bailliage of Gisors (the smallest one and later attached to Rouen)
  • Grand bailliage of Alencon
  • Grand bailliage of Cotentin
  • Grand bailliage of Caen
I've used 6 largest ones and it's easy to split 6-province Normandy into Lower & Upper Normandy states.

Channel Islands province would be another interesting possibility. By most parameters it was more important islands than the likes of Menorca, Ibiza or Isle of Man.
Brittany.jpg

I suggest 6 provinces:
  • Nantais
  • Rennais
  • Saint-Malo (Sanit Malo + Dol + Saint-Brieuc)
  • Leon & Tregor (can't decide how to name it)
  • Cornouaille
  • Vannetais
This will make size of provinces more balanced and some extra flavour for independent Brittany won't hurt.
Brittany would be made of 2 states - Upper & Lower Brittany, just as it was divided historically.
Loire valley I've split into 2 states - Anjou & Orleanais.

Anjou state to be made up of Angevin historical counties:
  • Anjou
  • Maine (Upper Maine)
  • Laval (Lower Maine)
  • Touraine
  • Perche
Laval and Perche were separate and highly autonomous counties already before 1444.

Orleanais state to be made up of historical Orleanais & Berry provinces:
  • Orleanais - bailliages of Orleanais & Montargis
  • Blois - bailliages of Blois & Vendome
  • Chartres - bailliage of Chartres
  • Berry - or Upper Berry with chief city of Bourges
  • Chateauroux - or Lower Berry with Chateauroux & Issoudun as contenders for 2nd most important town status in Berry.
This map says it all:
Poitou.jpg

Aunis is small province, but it was very important economically and also the most urbanised province in this region thanks to 2 big cities of La Rochelle & Rochefort.
Guyenne.png

Guyenne replaced old term of "Aquitaine" and for EUIV timeframe consisted of 5 historical divisions:
  • Bordelais (with capital Bordeaux)
  • Agenais
  • Perigord
  • Quercy
  • Rouergue

Gascony.png

While Gascony was one of the most fragmented regions in France. Many interpretations possible there, but I have focused on 15th century possessions:
  • Labourd - province covering Labourd, great port of Bayonne and town of Dax, all of this still at possession of English in 1444.
  • Bearn - part of Bearn & Foix country.
  • Bigorre - covering Bigorre & Comminges both of which were in possession of House of Foix in 1444, yet Comminges shortly after was lost to French Crown.
  • Armagnac - lands in possession of House Armagnac.
  • Albret - lands belonging to House of Albret, that is most of nowadays Landes province and also southern part of historical Bazadais province.
I've split Massif Central region into Limousin & Auvergne. And while I gave same culture - Auvergnat, these 2 regions where actually quite distinct from each other so it makes perfect sense to put them as separate states.

Map of 15th century Limousin:
Limousin.png

At the time it was bigger - about 20k km2 area, as it also included northern part of Perigord province, small parts of Quercy and etc. And 3 provinces would be perfect for Limousin:
  • La Marche
  • Limoges - also known as Upper Limousin.
  • Turenne - or Lower Limousin, covering Turenne, Ventadour and Comborn.

Limoges was in possession of House of Chatillon, later of House of Albret before it was integrated into France in 16th century, while Turenne was in possession of House of La Tour d'Auvergne until as late as 18th century, so split of Limousin into Limoges & Turenne should give game more flavour and probably the only realistic option how to represent House of La Tour d'Auvergne in 1444.
French wikipedia suggests that small lands of Turenne alone had around 100k inhabitants in 15th century, Ventadour which was fief of La Tour d'Auvergne should make this double, so Turenne province should be relatively populous in 15th century.



Auvergne state can be made up of historical Bourbonnais and Auvergne provinces:
  • Bourbonnais
  • Auvergne (Lower Auvergne)
  • Aurillac (Upper Auvergne)
Maps of Lower & Upper Auvergne:
Auvergne.png


Also worth mentioning that Lower Auvergne was not entirely united in 1444 with House of Bourbon, House of La Tour d'Auvergne and bishop of Clermont having their share of land in it. However I couldn't find any reasonable ways how to further divide it yet province is still quite big and extremely populous compared to other provinces in my map.
My suggested provinces for Languedoc would be:
  • Nimes
  • Vivarais
  • Velay (Velay + Gevaudan)
  • Toulouse
  • Foix
  • Carcassonne
  • Beziers

As you see I remove/rename 2 provinces of France already in game - Narbonnais & Montpellier(!) .
Looks weird, right?
But if we follow the history of Languedoc we'll find that Nimes (also called Beaucaire et Nimes) was the major seneschal (administrative division) of Languedoc existing since 13th century, probably the most important one in entire Languedoc as Nimes-Beaucaire area was economically the most important axis of Languedoc. Seneschal of Montpellier appeared only in mid 16th century as a split from Nimes and was few times smaller than that of Nimes.
While Narbonne was center of Viscounty Narbonnais during Middle Ages but it completely disappears as autonomous division at early 16th century when it gets fully integrated into France. Since then it's integral part of Seneschal of Carcassonne.

Map of Languedoc divisions:
Languedoc.jpg


Seneschal of Beaucaire et Nimes is also known as Lower Languedoc, while seneschals of Toulouse and Carcassonne make up Upper Languedoc.
Foix becomes separate county independent from Toulouse and is not considered to be part of Languedoc.
Seneschal of Carcassonne is split in half in 16th century and since then is known as Seneschal of Carcassonne & Beziers with seats in Carcassonne & Beziers.
North of seneschal of Beaucaire et Nimes is made up of highly autonomous divisions of Vivarais, Velay and Gevaudan.

Political "weight" of Languedoc divisions as follow:
Nimes - 16 deputies
Toulouse - 16 deputies
Carcassonne - 8 deputies
Beziers - 8 deputies
Villeneuve-de-Berg (Vivarais) - 8 deputies
Annonay - 4 deputies
Velay (Le Puy) - 4 deputies
Mende (Gevaudan) - 4 deputies
Montpellier - 4 deputies
Castres - 4 deputies
Limoux - 4 deputies
Castelnaudary (Lauragais) - 4 deputies

Largest cities in 1800:
Toulouse - 52 000
Nimes - 41 000
Montpellier - 33 000
Carcassonne - 15 000
Beziers - 14 500
Castres - 13 500
Le Puy - 12 000
Albi - 10 000
Narbonne - 9 000

So this is how I come up to proposed states and provinces.
Small Montpellier province probably would find its place in my 8 or 9-province Languedoc, but 7-province Languedoc I think I made about right given historical divisions.
Provence was fragmented, but 4 potential provinces are obvious:
  • Provence - covering 3 large cities of Marseille, Aix and Arles.
  • Toulon - covering Toulon & Draguignan
  • Forcalquier - mountainous inland part of Provence
  • Avignon (or Venaissin) - Papal State area
Map of Savoy-Dauphine in 1447:
Dauphine-Savoy.png


My proposed provinces for Upper Rhone region (Savoy state) would be:
  • Savoie (Savoie proper) with capital at Chambery.
  • Genevois (city Geneva + Gex + Genevois + Faucigny) - or simply old County of Geneva. For the first 100 year Genevois would be part of Savoy in full, but we know that city Geneva allies Swiss Confederacy and becomes de facto independant from 16th century, while rest of Genevois (then Duchy of Genevois) remains loyal to Savoy.
  • Bresse (Bresse & Bugey)
  • Vaud
  • Valais (Chablais or Lower Valais + Upper Valais)

With such division it will be difficult to picture ownerships of provinces ideally correct but personally I would hold off from giving province of its own to city of Geneva or extremely sparsely populated Upper Valais.
These 5 provinces should be enough to make Upper Rhone detailed enough.


For Dauphine state I would combine historical provinces of Dauphine and Lyonnais.
Dauphine at the time was divided into 8 bailliages while Lyonnais into 3, and I think 5 provinces in similar shapes to nowadays France departments would be ideal for this region:
  • Lyonnais (bailliages of Lyonnais & Beaujolais)
  • Forez
  • Dauphine (bailliages of Vienne, Saint-Marcellin & Grenoble)
  • Valentinois (bailliages of Valence & Die)
  • Gapencais (bailliages of Gap, Briancon & d'Embrun)
Burgundy.jpg


Burgundy is the only region where I make no new provinces as already in game Dijon, Charolais & Auxerre provinces cover historical bailliages of Burgundy in very balanced way - 6 bailliages each:
  • Dijonais (bailliages of Dijon, Chalon, Beaune, Nuits, d'Auxonne & Saint-Jean-de-Losne)
  • Charolais (bailliages of Charolles, Macon, d'Autun, Montcenis, Semur-en-Brions & Bourbon-Lancy)
  • Auxerrois (bailliages of d'Auxerre, Chatillon, Semur, d'Avallon, d'Arnay-le-Duc & Saulieu)
  • Nivernais


Franche-Comte.jpg


But Burgundy can be strenghtened in game by dividing huge province of Franche-Comte into 3 historical bailliages:
  • Vesoul
  • Besancon - it's important to note however that Dole was more important town (early capital of Franche-Comte) than Besancon early on.
  • Poligny - don't know if it's best name for southern province, but French sources suggest that Poligny was chief town and administrative center of this bailliage for 15th-17th centuries.
Bailliages of Champagne were many and very chaotic placed so I would rather look at this map to see and understand geography of Champagne better:
Champagne.png


My suggested provinces would be:
  • Troyes - historical capital of Champagne, once commercial center of Europe thanks to Champagne Fairs.
  • Reims
  • Rethel - to cover Ardennes region.
  • Meaux (or Provins) - to cover historical region of Brie in Champagne.
  • Langres - the most important town in southeast Champagne.

Historical region of Ile-de-France changed over time, but I concentrate on this map:
Ile-de-France.png

4 suggested provinces:
  • Valois (Valois, Soissonnais, Noyonnais, Laonnois)
  • Beauvaisis (Beauvaisis, Vexin francais)
  • Paris (Pays de France, Mantois, Hurepoix)
  • Nemours (Brie francaise, Gatinais)
Lorraine.jpg


Lands of Lorraine since 15th century were divided between Duchy of Bar, Duchy of Lorraine and Bishopric of Metz, Verdun & Toul. Duchy of Lorraine made up the biggest part of Lorraine and historically was divided into 3 bailliages - Vosges, Nancy & "German" (d'Allemagne) bailliages.
And those are the 5 provinces I suggest for Lorraine:
  • Bar - representing Duchy of Bar
  • Metz - representing Bishopric of Metz, Verdun & Toul (placed at northwest corner of Lorraine)
  • Nancy - representing bailliage of Nancy
  • Vosges - representing bailliage of Vosges
  • Saarland - representing bailliage of d'Allemagne and rest of Saarland (County of Nassau-Saarbrucken and etc.)

It's difficult to give proper name for bailliage of d'Allemagne and Saarland is the best choice I come up with. County of Nassau-Saarbrucken was very small, 3-4 times smaller than bailliage of d'Allemagne so Saarland province may cover all historical Saarland and German culture Lorraine. Historical map of province:
allemagne.baillage.jpg
I've added 3 more provinces in southern Low Countries which all I believe sooner or later will be added to the game - Lille, Vermandois & Arlon.
What I wanted to do more there is to make states which would make most sense there.
Hainaut.jpg


Picardy state to be made up of Burgundian lands which were inherited by France.
  • Calais
  • Amiens
  • Vermandois
Hainaut state to include counties of Hainaut and Artois which were inherited by Habsburgs after fall of Burgundy. Both counties lie in same geographical area - upper Scheldt river basin and these counties were also southwestern boundary of Seventeen Provinces so it makes perfect sense to separate them from French Picardy state.
  • Hainaut
  • Artois
  • Cambresis
Flanders state to be made up of historical County of Flanders only:
  • Ghent
  • Bruges
  • Lille
Wallonia state to include all historical Wallonia and possibly Luxembourg:
  • Liege
  • Namur
  • Arlon
  • Luxembourg

My intentions were to bring map of France to about the same level of detail as maps of its neighbours England and Germany already are. Proposed provinces might seem many but compared to its neighbours - number is reasonable.
Say if we compare France to Germany in modern borders, we can count that France has only 62 provinces compared to 67 of Germany, yet France is 50% larger in area and during years 1500-1800 was twice as rich (in GDP) and twice as populous compared to Germany in modern boundaries.
What are the reasons for Germany to have more provinces than France? Lots of small independent nations? Well, France was far from united in 1444 and many independent or partly independent tags can be released there as well.




2. FRENCH FIEFS

House.png


House of Anjou
1444-1481 Anjou
1444-1481 Laval
1448-1481 Maine
1444-1480 Bar
1444-1481 Provence
1444-1481 Toulon
1444-1481 Forcalquier
*it's weird that House of Anjou is called "Provence" in the game now, this should be changed

House of Orleans
1444-1498 Orleanais
1444-1498 Blois
1444-1498 Valois
1444-1498 Angouleme (potentially can be vassal-appanage of Orleans)

House of Bourbon
1444-1522 Bourbonnais
1444-1522 Auvergne
1444-1522 Aurillac
1444-1522 Forez
1477-1522 La Marche

House of Alencon
1449-1525 Alencon
1449-1525 Perche
1497-1525 Armagnac
1497-1525 Rouergue (Rodez)
*it would be nice if there was event for House of Alencon to appear in the game. 1444-1449 truce between France & England, then event fires which starts the England-France war and puts independent 2-province Alencon on French side in war.

House of d'Armagnac
1444-1497 Armagnac
1444-1497 Rouergue (Rodez)
1444-1503 Nemours
1444-1477 La Marche

House of Foix
1444-1479 Foix
1444-1479 Bearn
1444-1479 Bigorre
*since 1479 part of Kingdom Navarre (?)

House of d'Albret
1444-1484 Albret
1470-1484 Limoges
1470-1484 Perigord
*since 1484 part of Kingdom Navarre (?)

House of Chatillon
1444-1470 Limoges
1444-1470 Perigord

House of La Tour d'Auvergne
1444-1738 Turenne




3. FRENCH CULTURE GROUP

Culture.png


As of now German, Latin and even Iberian culture group is bigger than French one which is weird given that France is the biggest country out there with probably the largest cultural diversity as well. So I made suggestion how to expand French culture group from 7 into 15 cultures. This should give extra difficulties for France to make full use of its provinces and better portray France regional identities.

Cultures for French group I've split according main language dialects of late medieval France.

Language d'Oil group had 9 main dialects at the time:
  • Norman
  • Angevin - covering Angevin, Mayennais, Sarthois, Percheron & Gallo dialects, but I would leave Gallo for Breton culture
  • Poitevin - Poitevin & Saintongeais dialects
  • Francien - covering Parisien, Orleanais, Tourangeau, Berrichon & Bourbonnais dialects
  • Champenois
  • Burgundian - Burgundy-Morvandiau & Franc-comtois dialects
  • Lorrain
  • Picard
  • Walloon

Language d'Oc (Occitan) I've split into:
  • Languedocian
  • Gascon
  • Auvergnat - covering both Auvergnat & Limousin dialects
  • Provencal - covering both Provencal & Vivaro-Alpine dialects
I cannot think of any reasonable tag with prime culture of Limousin & Vivaro-Alpine, so I don't see them as separate cultures to add.

And then there are Breton and Franco-Provencal (Arpitan) dialects.

All this make up 15 potential cultures for France.




4. DEVELOPMENT

I made lots of research how to spread out provinces in France to make a well balanced map and therefore I have good idea now approx how development should also spread out between different regions of France. Total development is increased there but higher number of states, number of non-French provinces in 1444 and high cultural diversity should well counterbalance this from making France more powerful. At least for the first 50-100 years France should be far more busy in uniting its historical lands and be more restricted from expanding elsewhere.

Development.png


To better understand France I've checked how it was divided politically - Estates General of 1789, and what were its largest cities, and population and urban population distribution - perfect source for this.

Maybe it's not ideally good to use year 1800 sources, but at least they are reliable.
For year 1500 general trend would be that coastal provinces were not as advanced as they were in 1800, especially Brittany, Languedoc and Provence. While inland areas, especially those of Loire valley, Champagne or even Limousin & Auvergne had greater role for economy and higher share of France population.

Maps look like this:
Generelites.png


Some more things to note.

Lille is the only major city of France not present in EUIV. Potential province of Lille is quite small but as we see through maps I made it's very densely populated and had 2nd largest urban population in year 1800 after Paris. In 15th century Lille had about 25k inhabitants and was one of the Burgundian capitals among Dijon, Bruges and Brussels. It's madness that it's still not in game!

Mediterranean used to be among most sparsely populated regions in France, especially during 15-16th centuries. But at same time it was the most urbanised region of France with half population of coastal Provence and Languedoc living in towns and cities, at least so in year 1800.

And finally I want to bring attention to Basse-Auvergne province. French wikipedia suggests that there were about half million inhabitants in Basse-Auvergne in 14th century which should make it by far the most populous province in my France map in year 1444. Not only it was populous, but it also had one of the most dense network of medium sized towns and strong industry. Auvergne economy was booming particularly in years between Hundred Year War and Wars of Religion. Paper mills of Auvergne are among the oldest ones in France and the most numerous at the time (Ambert-Thiers surroundings) which made Auvergne leading region of paper production during centuries before French Revoliution. Cutlery was another major industry in Auvergne which had no match in France and which gave city of Thiers international reputation. So Basse-Auvergne is large, populous, decently urbanised and very industrous province which should make it among most developed provinces of France in year 1444 I think.




5. TRADE

And finally suggestion on trade. There is always room for different interpretations, but I believe that I interpreted history of French trade really accurate there, at least what comes to area change of trade nodes and locations of most important trade ports during XV-XVIII centuries.

Trade2.png



English Channel
I think England has way too many provinces in English Channel now which just do not fit concept of English Channel trade. If we look geographically - only Wessex, Sussex, Essex & East Anglia are near English Channel. And what a coincidence - those are the richest and most urbanised regions of England during 15-17th centuries, thanks to ... trade activities on English Channel. Regions in the north like Mercia or Wales were commercially remote regions and developed only much later - at the time when trade with America was going full scale. Even great port of Bristol has no history of big involvement in trade on English Channel but dominated trade with Ireland, Wales, or even Iceland instead, so Bristol and everything north of it would fit North Sea trade node much better I think.

Rheinland
Valley of Meuse should be Rheinland trade area as city like Liege was heavily involved in iron trade with Cologne and other German cities and hadn't much to do with Champagne fairs. Same with Metz & Lorraine - those are left bank Rhine, trade with France was never as important as trade along Rhine before 1800.

Champagne
Medieval times are past and glory days of Champagne Fairs are over, but this trade node still could represent land routes linking Mediterranean with English Channel. Troyes, Orleans, Paris and Lyon were 4 key inland commercial hubs of France during different periods of time and I think all these 4 should be in trade node which is supposed to be main trade node for France. Champagne trade node should also contain Savoy, Geneva and all French Switzerland along upper Rhone, Burgundy and Franche-Comte along Saone and Auvergne which was heavily involved in south-north trade directions linking it with Lyon & Orleans.

Bordeaux
All western France coast, Basque lands, Limousin which is historical Aquitaine with strong commercial link to Bordeaux and Anjou-Touraine which connected Nantes with Orleans.

Genoa
Only coastal Mediterannean France states should be there I think.
Seville -> Bordeaux
This one is must to include. It should be good for game play and it's historically important and correct - every article on France-Spain trade relations will highlight how profitable was trade for French merchants with Seville and other ports of Iberia.

Bordeaux & Rheinland -> English Channel instead of Champagne -> English Channel
This one is just idea. Now Champagne trade node is too weak to keep up decent amount of trade since it has 2 major trade nodes steering trade from it while competition in Bordeaux trade node is plain boring - there's no incentive to send light ships neither for France neither for anyone else there (only for Brittany for as long as it survives). And as history says France trade balance wasn't bad with England & Netherlands but it constantly ran into big deficit with Italian traders, so single exit from Champagne to Genoa may well picture that. It can also be noted that Lyon, Burgundy, Franche-Comte and even Champagne were frequently visited by Italian traders and had Italian merchant communities while English or Dutch merchants were rarely to be seen there.
Rheinland -> English Channel would be as correct as it can only be.
Major trade ports
  • Rouen
  • Nantes
  • Bordeaux
  • Marseille
For different periods of time all of these could be seen as no.1 port of France. Estuary next to CoT fit nice for these.

Other coastal trade centers
  • Bayonne - Bayonne merchants were controlling large share of trade in Bay of Biscay since medieval times actively participating in trade between Spain, France and England. Also Bayonne was the largest city in Gascony after Bordeaux.
  • La Rochelle - one of the most important ports of France in western coast, especially early on, while later it was somewhat outcompeted by Bordeaux & Nantes.
  • Saint-Malo - major commercial port of Brittany since Middle Ages and port of the largest Breton merchant group known as Malouin traders. They were largely autonomous traders establishing even Merchant Republic of Saint-Malo in 1590 for few years. Malouin traders were especially active on international scene participating actively in trade with America and French East India Company affairs. French sources suggest that Saint-Malo had the largest ocean going trade fleet in 17th century compared to any other French port.
  • Dieppe & Le Havre - major port cities of Caux. Dieppe used to be 2nd most important port of Normandy after Rouen, but it didn't take too long for Le Havre to claim this position. Caux province should be fierce commercial competitor to Rouen, while Lower Normandy remained commercially neglected region.
  • Calais - this one is tough call. Very important staple port of England early on, but since French occupation its commercial premience is over and it is nothing more but fishing port of no particular importance. If only possible I would use some other trade modifier there, something similar to Sound Toll which would benefit only England if England owns Calais.
  • Lille & Dunkirk - province of major commercial importance. Dunkirk starts as lesser port compared to Calais but from 17th century it clearly outcompetes Calais. While Lille stayed commercially important all centuries long - little Paris of the north. I guess CoTs in Calais-Lille-Bruges might be too much there and I would sacrifice Calais in first place as from France historical perspective French-Flanders was far more commercially important.
I skip all the ports like Brest, Toulon, Lorient and Cherbourg as they were either military ports or developed only much later - after 1700 and later.

Major inland trade centers
  • Orleans
  • Lyon
  • Paris
Thanks to their great positions on Loire, Rhone & Seine respectively these were the largest and most important commercial & financial centers of continental France.

Major Trade Fairs
  • Troyes - main market town of legendary Fairs of Champagne. Fairs of Champagne had lost its importance in 15th century already, but Troyes remained main commercial town of Champagne region for at least few more centuries.
  • Beaucaire (near Nimes) - the largest French trade fair during 13-19th centuries in Mediterannean region. It is said that one week of fair was exceeding total volume of yearly trade done in Marseilles.

Other commercial towns of France
  • Metz - main commercial town in Lorraine since Midde Ages.
  • Besancon - financial fair founded by Genoese bankers and traders in 16th century gave big stimulus for Besancon to become the largest and commercially the most important town in Franche-Comte.
  • Dijon - it's central position with well developed roads to all directions made it main trade hub and capital of Burgundy.
  • Tours - it was major commercial and industrial town of France during 15-16th centuries with over 50 000 inhabitants and silk industry (oldest in France). During next centuries however Tours went into decline.
  • Angers - capital of Anjou, its great position near confluence of Sarthe, Mayenne & Loire rivers made it main trade hub of Maine-Anjou region.
  • Clermont-Ferrand - the largest town of Auvergne wasn't particularly industrous itself, but it was main center of commerce with 4 annual fairs for many surrounding industrous towns of Auvergne like Thiers, Ambert, Riom, Issoire and etc.
  • Limoges - with many well developed roads to all directions Limoges was trade hub for region within 100km range around. But mostly it profited as being trade station on road linking Bordeaux with central France.
  • Reims - I guess it's mistake that Reims is level 2 COT in EUIV now - misplacement of Champagne Fairs? However Reims was commercially important town and could use level 1 COT if high density of COTs is preferred.
  • Toulouse - I confess that sources I went through state that Toulouse had relatively small commerce given that it was major town, however there are no other more important commercial town in provinces around.

Other trade centers outside France
  • Bilbao - Basques were well renown for their merchants and sailors, and Bilbao was the greatest port in region, one of the richest in whole Bay of Biscay.
  • Norwich - 2nd largest city of England during 15-17th centuries which is said to be as rich as London back then. All this thanks to intense wool trade with Low Countries which was set up by Flemish(Dutch) merchants since Middle Ages. *Overall I think Norfolk should be split into Norfolk & Suffolk as East Anglia used to be the most urbanised and developed region of England.
  • Southampton - with the best harbour on southern coast of England Southampton attracted lots of commerce along English Channel.
  • Liege - Meuse valley was well renowned for its metal industry, especially iron, and Liege was by far the largest and most important town of this trade.
  • Zurich - the most mercantile town of Switzerland back then. COT should be moved from Bern to Zurich.
  • Geneva - commercial and financial capital of upper Rhone region.

I hope all this can be useful :)
@neondt
 
Last edited:
  • 3Like
  • 1
  • 1
Reactions:
Upvote 0

Mr.Grizzly

Lt. General
74 Badges
Nov 17, 2018
1.492
1.540
  • Crusader Kings II
  • Europa Universalis IV: Third Rome
  • Stellaris: Synthetic Dawn
  • Crusader Kings II: Jade Dragon
  • Europa Universalis IV: Rule Britannia
  • Hearts of Iron IV: Together for Victory
  • Crusader Kings II: Conclave
  • Imperator: Rome Deluxe Edition
  • Stellaris: Galaxy Edition
  • Hearts of Iron IV: Cadet
  • Hearts of Iron IV: Colonel
  • Crusader Kings II: Reapers Due
  • Europa Universalis IV: Rights of Man
  • Stellaris: Digital Anniversary Edition
  • Stellaris: Leviathans Story Pack
  • Cities: Skylines - Natural Disasters
  • Crusader Kings II: Horse Lords
  • Crusader Kings II: Monks and Mystics
  • Cities: Skylines - Mass Transit
  • Europa Universalis IV: Mandate of Heaven
  • Hearts of Iron IV: Death or Dishonor
  • Cities: Skylines - Green Cities
  • Hearts of Iron IV: Expansion Pass
  • Stellaris: Humanoids Species Pack
  • Stellaris: Apocalypse
  • Europa Universalis 4: Emperor
  • Europa Universalis IV: Golden Century
  • Crusader Kings II: Holy Fury
  • Europa Universalis IV: Dharma
  • Stellaris: Distant Stars
  • Cities: Skylines - Parklife
  • Hearts of Iron IV: Expansion Pass
  • Europa Universalis IV
  • Hearts of Iron IV: No Step Back
  • Hearts of Iron IV: By Blood Alone
  • Europa Universalis IV: Common Sense
  • Battle for Bosporus
  • Crusader Kings III: Royal Edition
  • Crusader Kings III
  • Victoria 2
  • Imperator: Rome - Magna Graecia
  • Cities: Skylines - Campus
  • War of the Roses
  • Cities: Skylines
  • Europa Universalis IV: El Dorado
  • Europa Universalis IV: Pre-order
  • Crusader Kings II: Way of Life
  • Cities: Skylines Industries
  • Hearts of Iron IV: Expansion Pass
  • Stellaris - Path to Destruction bundle
They do if you're asking the devs to implement more new cultures. The devs will only consider it if the culture has a minimum of 3 provinces. Otherwise Paradox would have to add many different culture not yet represented in the game, such as the Assyrians, Cumans, Corsicans, Chuvash, Mordvins, Edo, Igbo, Ossetians, etc. I do wish they could sometimes relax that policy, as it's just weird that the Benin Kingdom is Yoruba instead of Edo as it should be.

Well that seems rather odd, I really wish Paradox would follow their own rules more often. They talk about not wanting to add more cultures because the group is too small but Maltese exists because they have a strange obsession with the tiny island. Thanks for the heads up though, would be nice to see more one province cultures or just tiny cultures added.
 

Flammifleure

Second Lieutenant
33 Badges
Aug 31, 2007
193
96
  • Europa Universalis IV: El Dorado
  • Europa Universalis 4: Emperor
  • Europa Universalis IV: Golden Century
  • Crusader Kings II: Holy Fury
  • Europa Universalis IV: Dharma
  • Europa Universalis IV: Rule Britannia
  • Europa Universalis IV: Cradle of Civilization
  • Age of Wonders III
  • Europa Universalis IV: Mandate of Heaven
  • Crusader Kings II: Monks and Mystics
  • Europa Universalis IV: Rights of Man
  • Stellaris
  • Europa Universalis IV: Mare Nostrum
  • Europa Universalis IV: Cossacks
  • Europa Universalis IV: Common Sense
  • Crusader Kings II: Legacy of Rome
  • Crusader Kings II: The Old Gods
  • Victoria 2
  • Europa Universalis III
  • Europa Universalis III Complete
  • Europa Universalis III Complete
  • Europa Universalis III Complete
  • Europa Universalis IV
  • Europa Universalis IV: Conquest of Paradise
  • Crusader Kings II: Sons of Abraham
  • Europa Universalis IV: Art of War
  • Europa Universalis IV: Third Rome
  • Victoria 2: Heart of Darkness
  • Europa Universalis IV: Wealth of Nations
  • Europa Universalis IV: Res Publica
  • Victoria 2: A House Divided
  • Europa Universalis IV: Pre-order
  • Crusader Kings II
Well that seems rather odd, I really wish Paradox would follow their own rules more often. They talk about not wanting to add more cultures because the group is too small but Maltese exists because they have a strange obsession with the tiny island. Thanks for the heads up though, would be nice to see more one province cultures or just tiny cultures added.
Like Luxembourgish.

Anyway, the more cultures in France, the weaker France is. Since the effect of cultures in-game is to increase division, and to make cores of the primary tag for that culture permanent. So if Auvergnat, Champenois and Picard were separate cultures, than Auvergne, Champagne and Picardy would have more likelihood of attaining independence. Which, after thinking about it, I'd be okay with. i'd rather see them than see France chopped into even smaller pieces.
 
  • 1Like
Reactions:

Scorpene

First Lieutenant
62 Badges
Jun 5, 2015
238
208
  • Cities: Skylines - After Dark
  • Europa Universalis IV: Art of War
  • Europa Universalis IV: Conquest of Paradise
  • Europa Universalis IV: Wealth of Nations
  • Europa Universalis IV: Res Publica
  • Hearts of Iron IV: Expansion Pass
  • Stellaris: Leviathans Story Pack
  • Cities: Skylines - Natural Disasters
  • Hearts of Iron IV: Together for Victory
  • Stellaris - Path to Destruction bundle
  • Europa Universalis IV: Mandate of Heaven
  • Hearts of Iron IV: Expansion Pass
  • Surviving Mars
  • Hearts of Iron IV: Death or Dishonor
  • Stellaris: Synthetic Dawn
  • Cities: Skylines - Green Cities
  • Europa Universalis IV: Cradle of Civilization
  • Europa Universalis IV: Mare Nostrum
  • Stellaris: Apocalypse
  • Europa Universalis IV: Rule Britannia
  • Imperator: Rome
  • Cities: Skylines - Parklife
  • Stellaris: Distant Stars
  • Europa Universalis IV: Dharma
  • Surviving Mars: First Colony Edition
  • Cities: Skylines Industries
  • Stellaris: Megacorp
  • Imperator: Rome Deluxe Edition
  • Hearts of Iron IV: Cadet
  • Europa Universalis 4: Emperor
  • Stellaris: Federations
  • Cities: Skylines - Campus
  • Stellaris: Nemesis
  • Prison Architect
  • Europa Universalis IV
  • Victoria 2
  • Cities: Skylines
  • Europa Universalis IV: El Dorado
  • Mount & Blade: Warband
  • Crusader Kings II: Way of Life
  • Europa Universalis IV: Common Sense
  • Hearts of Iron IV: La Resistance
  • Battle for Bosporus
  • Europa Universalis IV: Rights of Man
  • Europa Universalis IV: Call to arms event
  • Darkest Hour
  • Europa Universalis IV: Cossacks
  • Cities: Skylines - Snowfall
  • Crusader Kings II: The Republic
  • Crusader Kings II: Rajas of India
A buff France need is the Britanny wedding. Currently you have 2 choices. Allying them, with no chance to diplo vassalize them, or go to war with Britanny and likely Burgundy and its minors. PUing Britanny and having a France with a swarm of vassals would mean less developement and allied early, but by 1550 one of the greatest might of Europe. (And a bigger likelihood of France getting Influence and aristocratic, instead of expansion and quality).

Now, im just scared that ParadoxInt did not understand fully the deception after GC and is going to do the same bullshit. Somewhat changing Europeans country by adding 3 provinces and 2 generic missions instead of fully reworking Europe and give more interest to 6 of the 7 most played country (not counting over buffed Ming and Otto here).

Would be a disgrace with all the great work provided by Forumers
 
  • 1Like
Reactions:

Pbhuh

Colonel
81 Badges
Sep 12, 2017
1.007
1.945
  • Crusader Kings II: Horse Lords
  • Magicka 2 - Signup Campaign
  • Imperator: Rome
  • Stellaris: Apocalypse
  • Magicka: Wizard Wars Founder Wizard
  • Mount & Blade: Warband
  • Crusader Kings II: Way of Life
  • Magicka 2
  • Europa Universalis IV: Common Sense
  • Cities: Skylines - Green Cities
  • Hearts of Iron IV: Death or Dishonor
  • Magicka 2: Ice, Death and Fury
  • Crusader Kings II: Conclave
  • Imperator: Rome Sign Up
  • Europa Universalis IV: Mare Nostrum
  • Hearts of Iron IV: Cadet
  • Crusader Kings II: Reapers Due
  • Europa Universalis IV: Rights of Man
  • Stellaris: Digital Anniversary Edition
  • Stellaris: Leviathans Story Pack
  • Cities: Skylines - Natural Disasters
  • Hearts of Iron IV: Together for Victory
  • Crusader Kings II: Monks and Mystics
  • Surviving Mars
  • Cities: Skylines - Mass Transit
  • Europa Universalis IV: Mandate of Heaven
  • Europa Universalis III: Collection
  • Crusader Kings II: Holy Fury
  • Surviving Mars: First Colony Edition
  • Stellaris: Humanoids Species Pack
  • Europa Universalis IV
  • Victoria 3 Sign Up
  • Crusader Kings III
  • Stellaris: Distant Stars
  • Europa Universalis IV: Rule Britannia
  • Hearts of Iron IV: Expansion Pass
  • Europa Universalis IV: Golden Century
  • Stellaris: Megacorp
  • Europa Universalis IV: Dharma
  • Victoria 2
  • Cities: Skylines - Parklife
  • Cities: Skylines - Campus
  • Cities: Skylines
  • Europa Universalis 4: Emperor
  • Crusader Kings II: Sword of Islam
  • Crusader Kings II: Sons of Abraham
  • Crusader Kings II: The Republic
  • Crusader Kings II: Rajas of India
  • Crusader Kings II: The Old Gods
  • Crusader Kings II: Charlemagne
Here is my proposal for France potential provinces for next update. It should be well balanced map :)


1. PROVINCES OF FRANCE

View attachment 472912

I've used historical provinces of Kingdom of France and some smaller divisions - bailliages & seneschals as main base for most provinces, also geographical definitions (Upper & Lower) to cut some provinces in half.

View attachment 472925
Before French Revolution Normandy had 7 administrative divisions - Grand bailliages:
  • Grand bailliage of Rouen
  • Grand bailliage of Caux
  • Grand bailliage of Evreux
  • Grand bailliage of Gisors (the smallest one and later attached to Rouen)
  • Grand bailliage of Alencon
  • Grand bailliage of Cotentin
  • Grand bailliage of Caen
I've used 6 largest ones and it's easy to split 6-province Normandy into Lower & Upper Normandy states.

Channel Islands province would be another interesting possibility. By most parameters it was more important islands than the likes of Menorca, Ibiza or Isle of Man.
View attachment 472926
I suggest 6 provinces:
  • Nantais
  • Rennais
  • Saint-Malo (Sanit Malo + Dol + Saint-Brieuc)
  • Leon & Tregor (can't decide how to name it)
  • Cornouaille
  • Vannetais
This will make size of provinces more balanced and some extra flavour for independent Brittany won't hurt.
Brittany would be made of 2 states - Upper & Lower Brittany, just as it was divided historically.
Loire valley I've split into 2 states - Anjou & Orleanais.

Anjou state to be made up of Angevin historical counties:
  • Anjou
  • Maine (Upper Maine)
  • Laval (Lower Maine)
  • Touraine
  • Perche
Laval and Perche were separate and highly autonomous counties already before 1444.

Orleanais state to be made up of historical Orleanais & Berry provinces:
  • Orleanais - bailliages of Orleanais & Montargis
  • Blois - bailliages of Blois & Vendome
  • Chartres - bailliage of Chartres
  • Berry - or Upper Berry with chief city of Bourges
  • Chateauroux - or Lower Berry with Chateauroux & Issoudun as contenders for 2nd most important town status in Berry.
This map says it all:
View attachment 472928
Aunis is small province, but it was very important economically and also the most urbanised province in this region thanks to 2 big cities of La Rochelle & Rochefort.
View attachment 472930
Guyenne replaced old term of "Aquitaine" and for EUIV timeframe consisted of 5 historical divisions:
  • Bordelais (with capital Bordeaux)
  • Agenais
  • Perigord
  • Quercy
  • Rouergue

View attachment 472931
While Gascony was one of the most fragmented regions in France. Many interpretations possible there, but I have focused on 15th century possessions:
  • Labourd - province covering Labourd, great port of Bayonne and town of Dax, all of this still at possession of English in 1444.
  • Bearn - part of Bearn & Foix country.
  • Bigorre - covering Bigorre & Comminges both of which were in possession of House of Foix in 1444, yet Comminges shortly after was lost to French Crown.
  • Armagnac - lands in possession of House Armagnac.
  • Albret - lands belonging to House of Albret, that is most of nowadays Landes province and also southern part of historical Bazadais province.
I've split Massif Central region into Limousin & Auvergne. And while I gave same culture - Auvergnat, these 2 regions where actually quite distinct from each other so it makes perfect sense to put them as separate states.

Map of 15th century Limousin:
View attachment 472934
At the time it was bigger - about 20k km2 area, as it also included northern part of Perigord province, small parts of Quercy and etc. And 3 provinces would be perfect for Limousin:
  • La Marche
  • Limoges - also known as Upper Limousin.
  • Turenne - or Lower Limousin, covering Turenne, Ventadour and Comborn.

Limoges was in possession of House of Chatillon, later of House of Albret before it was integrated into France in 16th century, while Turenne was in possession of House of La Tour d'Auvergne until as late as 18th century, so split of Limousin into Limoges & Turenne should give game more flavour and probably the only realistic option how to represent House of La Tour d'Auvergne in 1444.
French wikipedia suggests that small lands of Turenne alone had around 100k inhabitants in 15th century, Ventadour which was fief of La Tour d'Auvergne should make this double, so Turenne province should be relatively populous in 15th century.



Auvergne state can be made up of historical Bourbonnais and Auvergne provinces:
  • Bourbonnais
  • Auvergne (Lower Auvergne)
  • Aurillac (Upper Auvergne)
Maps of Lower & Upper Auvergne:
View attachment 472936

Also worth mentioning that Lower Auvergne was not entirely united in 1444 with House of Bourbon, House of La Tour d'Auvergne and bishop of Clermont having their share of land in it. However I couldn't find any reasonable ways how to further divide it yet province is still quite big and extremely populous compared to other provinces in my map.
My suggested provinces for Languedoc would be:
  • Nimes
  • Vivarais
  • Velay (Velay + Gevaudan)
  • Toulouse
  • Foix
  • Carcassonne
  • Beziers

As you see I remove/rename 2 provinces of France already in game - Narbonnais & Montpellier(!) .
Looks weird, right?
But if we follow the history of Languedoc we'll find that Nimes (also called Beaucaire et Nimes) was the major seneschal (administrative division) of Languedoc existing since 13th century, probably the most important one in entire Languedoc as Nimes-Beaucaire area was economically the most important axis of Languedoc. Seneschal of Montpellier appeared only in mid 16th century as a split from Nimes and was few times smaller than that of Nimes.
While Narbonne was center of Viscounty Narbonnais during Middle Ages but it completely disappears as autonomous division at early 16th century when it gets fully integrated into France. Since then it's integral part of Seneschal of Carcassonne.

Map of Languedoc divisions:
View attachment 472937

Seneschal of Beaucaire et Nimes is also known as Lower Languedoc, while seneschals of Toulouse and Carcassonne make up Upper Languedoc.
Foix becomes separate county independent from Toulouse and is not considered to be part of Languedoc.
Seneschal of Carcassonne is split in half in 16th century and since then is known as Seneschal of Carcassonne & Beziers with seats in Carcassonne & Beziers.
North of seneschal of Beaucaire et Nimes is made up of highly autonomous divisions of Vivarais, Velay and Gevaudan.

Political "weight" of Languedoc divisions as follow:
Nimes - 16 deputies
Toulouse - 16 deputies
Carcassonne - 8 deputies
Beziers - 8 deputies
Villeneuve-de-Berg (Vivarais) - 8 deputies
Annonay - 4 deputies
Velay (Le Puy) - 4 deputies
Mende (Gevaudan) - 4 deputies
Montpellier - 4 deputies
Castres - 4 deputies
Limoux - 4 deputies
Castelnaudary (Lauragais) - 4 deputies

Largest cities in 1800:
Toulouse - 52 000
Nimes - 41 000
Montpellier - 33 000
Carcassonne - 15 000
Beziers - 14 500
Castres - 13 500
Le Puy - 12 000
Albi - 10 000
Narbonne - 9 000

So this is how I come up to proposed states and provinces.
Small Montpellier province probably would find its place in my 8 or 9-province Languedoc, but 7-province Languedoc I think I made about right given historical divisions.
Provence was fragmented, but 4 potential provinces are obvious:
  • Provence - covering 3 large cities of Marseille, Aix and Arles.
  • Toulon - covering Toulon & Draguignan
  • Forcalquier - mountainous inland part of Provence
  • Avignon (or Venaissin) - Papal State area
Map of Savoy-Dauphine in 1447:
View attachment 472938

My proposed provinces for Upper Rhone region (Savoy state) would be:
  • Savoie (Savoie proper) with capital at Chambery.
  • Genevois (city Geneva + Gex + Genevois + Faucigny) - or simply old County of Geneva. For the first 100 year Genevois would be part of Savoy in full, but we know that city Geneva allies Swiss Confederacy and becomes de facto independant from 16th century, while rest of Genevois (then Duchy of Genevois) remains loyal to Savoy.
  • Bresse (Bresse & Bugey)
  • Vaud
  • Valais (Chablais or Lower Valais + Upper Valais)

With such division it will be difficult to picture ownerships of provinces ideally correct but personally I would hold off from giving province of its own to city of Geneva or extremely sparsely populated Upper Valais.
These 5 provinces should be enough to make Upper Rhone detailed enough.


For Dauphine state I would combine historical provinces of Dauphine and Lyonnais.
Dauphine at the time was divided into 8 bailliages while Lyonnais into 3, and I think 5 provinces in similar shapes to nowadays France departments would be ideal for this region:
  • Lyonnais (bailliages of Lyonnais & Beaujolais)
  • Forez
  • Dauphine (bailliages of Vienne, Saint-Marcellin & Grenoble)
  • Valentinois (bailliages of Valence & Die)
  • Gapencais (bailliages of Gap, Briancon & d'Embrun)
View attachment 472939

Burgundy is the only region where I make no new provinces as already in game Dijon, Charolais & Auxerre provinces cover historical bailliages of Burgundy in very balanced way - 6 bailliages each:
  • Dijonais (bailliages of Dijon, Chalon, Beaune, Nuits, d'Auxonne & Saint-Jean-de-Losne)
  • Charolais (bailliages of Charolles, Macon, d'Autun, Montcenis, Semur-en-Brions & Bourbon-Lancy)
  • Auxerrois (bailliages of d'Auxerre, Chatillon, Semur, d'Avallon, d'Arnay-le-Duc & Saulieu)
  • Nivernais


View attachment 472940

But Burgundy can be strenghtened in game by dividing huge province of Franche-Comte into 3 historical bailliages:
  • Vesoul
  • Besancon - it's important to note however that Dole was more important town (early capital of Franche-Comte) than Besancon early on.
  • Poligny - don't know if it's best name for southern province, but French sources suggest that Poligny was chief town and administrative center of this bailliage for 15th-17th centuries.
Bailliages of Champagne were many and very chaotic placed so I would rather look at this map to see and understand geography of Champagne better:
View attachment 472941

My suggested provinces would be:
  • Troyes - historical capital of Champagne, once commercial center of Europe thanks to Champagne Fairs.
  • Reims
  • Rethel - to cover Ardennes region.
  • Meaux (or Provins) - to cover historical region of Brie in Champagne.
  • Langres - the most important town in southeast Champagne.

Historical region of Ile-de-France changed over time, but I concentrate on this map:
View attachment 472942
4 suggested provinces:
  • Valois (Valois, Soissonnais, Noyonnais, Laonnois)
  • Beauvaisis (Beauvaisis, Vexin francais)
  • Paris (Pays de France, Mantois, Hurepoix)
  • Nemours (Brie francaise, Gatinais)
View attachment 472943

Lands of Lorraine since 15th century were divided between Duchy of Bar, Duchy of Lorraine and Bishopric of Metz, Verdun & Toul. Duchy of Lorraine made up the biggest part of Lorraine and historically was divided into 3 bailliages - Vosges, Nancy & "German" (d'Allemagne) bailliages.
And those are the 5 provinces I suggest for Lorraine:
  • Bar - representing Duchy of Bar
  • Metz - representing Bishopric of Metz, Verdun & Toul (placed at northwest corner of Lorraine)
  • Nancy - representing bailliage of Nancy
  • Vosges - representing bailliage of Vosges
  • Saarland - representing bailliage of d'Allemagne and rest of Saarland (County of Nassau-Saarbrucken and etc.)

It's difficult to give proper name for bailliage of d'Allemagne and Saarland is the best choice I come up with. County of Nassau-Saarbrucken was very small, 3-4 times smaller than bailliage of d'Allemagne so Saarland province may cover all historical Saarland and German culture Lorraine. Historical map of province:
View attachment 472944
I've added 3 more provinces in southern Low Countries which all I believe sooner or later will be added to the game - Lille, Vermandois & Arlon.
What I wanted to do more there is to make states which would make most sense there.
View attachment 472945

Picardy state to be made up of Burgundian lands which were inherited by France.
  • Calais
  • Amiens
  • Vermandois
Hainaut state to include counties of Hainaut and Artois which were inherited by Habsburgs after fall of Burgundy. Both counties lie in same geographical area - upper Scheldt river basin and these counties were also southwestern boundary of Seventeen Provinces so it makes perfect sense to separate them from French Picardy state.
  • Hainaut
  • Artois
  • Cambresis
Flanders state to be made up of historical County of Flanders only:
  • Ghent
  • Bruges
  • Lille
Wallonia state to include all historical Wallonia and possibly Luxembourg:
  • Liege
  • Namur
  • Arlon
  • Luxembourg

My intentions were to bring map of France to about the same level of detail as maps of its neighbours England and Germany already are. Proposed provinces might seem many but compared to its neighbours - number is reasonable.
Say if we compare France to Germany in modern borders, we can count that France has only 62 provinces compared to 67 of Germany, yet France is 50% larger in area and during years 1500-1800 was twice as rich (in GDP) and twice as populous compared to Germany in modern boundaries.
What are the reasons for Germany to have more provinces than France? Lots of small independent nations? Well, France was far from united in 1444 and many independent or partly independent tags can be released there as well.




2. FRENCH FIEFS

View attachment 472913

House of Anjou
1444-1481 Anjou
1444-1481 Laval
1448-1481 Maine
1444-1480 Bar
1444-1481 Provence
1444-1481 Toulon
1444-1481 Forcalquier
*it's weird that House of Anjou is called "Provence" in the game now, this should be changed

House of Orleans
1444-1498 Orleanais
1444-1498 Blois
1444-1498 Valois
1444-1498 Angouleme (potentially can be vassal-appanage of Orleans)

House of Bourbon
1444-1522 Bourbonnais
1444-1522 Auvergne
1444-1522 Aurillac
1444-1522 Forez
1477-1522 La Marche

House of Alencon
1449-1525 Alencon
1449-1525 Perche
1497-1525 Armagnac
1497-1525 Rouergue (Rodez)
*it would be nice if there was event for House of Alencon to appear in the game. 1444-1449 truce between France & England, then event fires which starts the England-France war and puts independent 2-province Alencon on French side in war.

House of d'Armagnac
1444-1497 Armagnac
1444-1497 Rouergue (Rodez)
1444-1503 Nemours
1444-1477 La Marche

House of Foix
1444-1479 Foix
1444-1479 Bearn
1444-1479 Bigorre
*since 1479 part of Kingdom Navarre (?)

House of d'Albret
1444-1484 Albret
1470-1484 Limoges
1470-1484 Perigord
*since 1484 part of Kingdom Navarre (?)

House of Chatillon
1444-1470 Limoges
1444-1470 Perigord

House of La Tour d'Auvergne
1444-1738 Turenne




3. FRENCH CULTURE GROUP

View attachment 472916

As of now German, Latin and even Iberian culture group is bigger than French one which is weird given that France is the biggest country out there with probably the largest cultural diversity as well. So I made suggestion how to expand French culture group from 7 into 15 cultures. This should give extra difficulties for France to make full use of its provinces and better portray France regional identities.

Cultures for French group I've split according main language dialects of late medieval France.

Language d'Oil group had 9 main dialects at the time:
  • Norman
  • Angevin - covering Angevin, Mayennais, Sarthois, Percheron & Gallo dialects, but I would leave Gallo for Breton culture
  • Poitevin - Poitevin & Saintongeais dialects
  • Francien - covering Parisien, Orleanais, Tourangeau, Berrichon & Bourbonnais dialects
  • Champenois
  • Burgundian - Burgundy-Morvandiau & Franc-comtois dialects
  • Lorrain
  • Picard
  • Walloon

Language d'Oc (Occitan) I've split into:
  • Languedocian
  • Gascon
  • Auvergnat - covering both Auvergnat & Limousin dialects
  • Provencal - covering both Provencal & Vivaro-Alpine dialects
I cannot think of any reasonable tag with prime culture of Limousin & Vivaro-Alpine, so I don't see them as separate cultures to add.

And then there are Breton and Franco-Provencal (Arpitan) dialects.

All this make up 15 potential cultures for France.




4. DEVELOPMENT

I made lots of research how to spread out provinces in France to make a well balanced map and therefore I have good idea now approx how development should also spread out between different regions of France. Total development is increased there but higher number of states, number of non-French provinces in 1444 and high cultural diversity should well counterbalance this from making France more powerful. At least for the first 50-100 years France should be far more busy in uniting its historical lands and be more restricted from expanding elsewhere.

View attachment 472918

To better understand France I've checked how it was divided politically - Estates General of 1789, and what were its largest cities, and population and urban population distribution - perfect source for this.

Maybe it's not ideally good to use year 1800 sources, but at least they are reliable.
For year 1500 general trend would be that coastal provinces were not as advanced as they were in 1800, especially Brittany, Languedoc and Provence. While inland areas, especially those of Loire valley, Champagne or even Limousin & Auvergne had greater role for economy and higher share of France population.

Maps look like this:
View attachment 472919

Some more things to note.

Lille is the only major city of France not present in EUIV. Potential province of Lille is quite small but as we see through maps I made it's very densely populated and had 2nd largest urban population in year 1800 after Paris. In 15th century Lille had about 25k inhabitants and was one of the Burgundian capitals among Dijon, Bruges and Brussels. It's madness that it's still not in game!

Mediterranean used to be among most sparsely populated regions in France, especially during 15-16th centuries. But at same time it was the most urbanised region of France with half population of coastal Provence and Languedoc living in towns and cities, at least so in year 1800.

And finally I want to bring attention to Basse-Auvergne province. French wikipedia suggests that there were about half million inhabitants in Basse-Auvergne in 14th century which should make it by far the most populous province in my France map in year 1444. Not only it was populous, but it also had one of the most dense network of medium sized towns and strong industry. Auvergne economy was booming particularly in years between Hundred Year War and Wars of Religion. Paper mills of Auvergne are among the oldest ones in France and the most numerous at the time (Ambert-Thiers surroundings) which made Auvergne leading region of paper production during centuries before French Revoliution. Cutlery was another major industry in Auvergne which had no match in France and which gave city of Thiers international reputation. So Basse-Auvergne is large, populous, decently urbanised and very industrous province which should make it among most developed provinces of France in year 1444 I think.




5. TRADE

And finally suggestion on trade. There is always room for different interpretations, but I believe that I interpreted history of French trade really accurate there, at least what comes to area change of trade nodes and locations of most important trade ports during XV-XVIII centuries.

View attachment 472923


English Channel
I think England has way too many provinces in English Channel now which just do not fit concept of English Channel trade. If we look geographically - only Wessex, Sussex, Essex & East Anglia are near English Channel. And what a coincidence - those are the richest and most urbanised regions of England during 15-17th centuries, thanks to ... trade activities on English Channel. Regions in the north like Mercia or Wales were commercially remote regions and developed only much later - at the time when trade with America was going full scale. Even great port of Bristol has no history of big involvement in trade on English Channel but dominated trade with Ireland, Wales, or even Iceland instead, so Bristol and everything north of it would fit North Sea trade node much better I think.

Rheinland
Valley of Meuse should be Rheinland trade area as city like Liege was heavily involved in iron trade with Cologne and other German cities and hadn't much to do with Champagne fairs. Same with Metz & Lorraine - those are left bank Rhine, trade with France was never as important as trade along Rhine before 1800.

Champagne
Medieval times are past and glory days of Champagne Fairs are over, but this trade node still could represent land routes linking Mediterranean with English Channel. Troyes, Orleans, Paris and Lyon were 4 key inland commercial hubs of France during different periods of time and I think all these 4 should be in trade node which is supposed to be main trade node for France. Champagne trade node should also contain Savoy, Geneva and all French Switzerland along upper Rhone, Burgundy and Franche-Comte along Saone and Auvergne which was heavily involved in south-north trade directions linking it with Lyon & Orleans.

Bordeaux
All western France coast, Basque lands, Limousin which is historical Aquitaine with strong commercial link to Bordeaux and Anjou-Touraine which connected Nantes with Orleans.

Genoa
Only coastal Mediterannean France states should be there I think.
Seville -> Bordeaux
This one is must to include. It should be good for game play and it's historically important and correct - every article on France-Spain trade relations will highlight how profitable was trade for French merchants with Seville and other ports of Iberia.

Bordeaux & Rheinland -> English Channel instead of Champagne -> English Channel
This one is just idea. Now Champagne trade node is too weak to keep up decent amount of trade since it has 2 major trade nodes steering trade from it while competition in Bordeaux trade node is plain boring - there's no incentive to send light ships neither for France neither for anyone else there (only for Brittany for as long as it survives). And as history says France trade balance wasn't bad with England & Netherlands but it constantly ran into big deficit with Italian traders, so single exit from Champagne to Genoa may well picture that. It can also be noted that Lyon, Burgundy, Franche-Comte and even Champagne were frequently visited by Italian traders and had Italian merchant communities while English or Dutch merchants were rarely to be seen there.
Rheinland -> English Channel would be as correct as it can only be.
Major trade ports
  • Rouen
  • Nantes
  • Bordeaux
  • Marseille
For different periods of time all of these could be seen as no.1 port of France. Estuary next to CoT fit nice for these.

Other coastal trade centers
  • Bayonne - Bayonne merchants were controlling large share of trade in Bay of Biscay since medieval times actively participating in trade between Spain, France and England. Also Bayonne was the largest city in Gascony after Bordeaux.
  • La Rochelle - one of the most important ports of France in western coast, especially early on, while later it was somewhat outcompeted by Bordeaux & Nantes.
  • Saint-Malo - major commercial port of Brittany since Middle Ages and port of the largest Breton merchant group known as Malouin traders. They were largely autonomous traders establishing even Merchant Republic of Saint-Malo in 1590 for few years. Malouin traders were especially active on international scene participating actively in trade with America and French East India Company affairs. French sources suggest that Saint-Malo had the largest ocean going trade fleet in 17th century compared to any other French port.
  • Dieppe & Le Havre - major port cities of Caux. Dieppe used to be 2nd most important port of Normandy after Rouen, but it didn't take too long for Le Havre to claim this position. Caux province should be fierce commercial competitor to Rouen, while Lower Normandy remained commercially neglected region.
  • Calais - this one is tough call. Very important staple port of England early on, but since French occupation its commercial premience is over and it is nothing more but fishing port of no particular importance. If only possible I would use some other trade modifier there, something similar to Sound Toll which would benefit only England if England owns Calais.
  • Lille & Dunkirk - province of major commercial importance. Dunkirk starts as lesser port compared to Calais but from 17th century it clearly outcompetes Calais. While Lille stayed commercially important all centuries long - little Paris of the north. I guess CoTs in Calais-Lille-Bruges might be too much there and I would sacrifice Calais in first place as from France historical perspective French-Flanders was far more commercially important.
I skip all the ports like Brest, Toulon, Lorient and Cherbourg as they were either military ports or developed only much later - after 1700 and later.

Major inland trade centers
  • Orleans
  • Lyon
  • Paris
Thanks to their great positions on Loire, Rhone & Seine respectively these were the largest and most important commercial & financial centers of continental France.

Major Trade Fairs
  • Troyes - main market town of legendary Fairs of Champagne. Fairs of Champagne had lost its importance in 15th century already, but Troyes remained main commercial town of Champagne region for at least few more centuries.
  • Beaucaire (near Nimes) - the largest French trade fair during 13-19th centuries in Mediterannean region. It is said that one week of fair was exceeding total volume of yearly trade done in Marseilles.

Other commercial towns of France
  • Metz - main commercial town in Lorraine since Midde Ages.
  • Besancon - financial fair founded by Genoese bankers and traders in 16th century gave big stimulus for Besancon to become the largest and commercially the most important town in Franche-Comte.
  • Dijon - it's central position with well developed roads to all directions made it main trade hub and capital of Burgundy.
  • Tours - it was major commercial and industrial town of France during 15-16th centuries with over 50 000 inhabitants and silk industry (oldest in France). During next centuries however Tours went into decline.
  • Angers - capital of Anjou, its great position near confluence of Sarthe, Mayenne & Loire rivers made it main trade hub of Maine-Anjou region.
  • Clermont-Ferrand - the largest town of Auvergne wasn't particularly industrous itself, but it was main center of commerce with 4 annual fairs for many surrounding industrous towns of Auvergne like Thiers, Ambert, Riom, Issoire and etc.
  • Limoges - with many well developed roads to all directions Limoges was trade hub for region within 100km range around. But mostly it profited as being trade station on road linking Bordeaux with central France.
  • Reims - I guess it's mistake that Reims is level 2 COT in EUIV now - misplacement of Champagne Fairs? However Reims was commercially important town and could use level 1 COT if high density of COTs is preferred.
  • Toulouse - I confess that sources I went through state that Toulouse had relatively small commerce given that it was major town, however there are no other more important commercial town in provinces around.

Other trade centers outside France
  • Bilbao - Basques were well renown for their merchants and sailors, and Bilbao was the greatest port in region, one of the richest in whole Bay of Biscay.
  • Norwich - 2nd largest city of England during 15-17th centuries which is said to be as rich as London back then. All this thanks to intense wool trade with Low Countries which was set up by Flemish(Dutch) merchants since Middle Ages. *Overall I think Norfolk should be split into Norfolk & Suffolk as East Anglia used to be the most urbanised and developed region of England.
  • Southampton - with the best harbour on southern coast of England Southampton attracted lots of commerce along English Channel.
  • Liege - Meuse valley was well renowned for its metal industry, especially iron, and Liege was by far the largest and most important town of this trade.
  • Zurich - the most mercantile town of Switzerland back then. COT should be moved from Bern to Zurich.
  • Geneva - commercial and financial capital of upper Rhone region.

I hope all this can be useful :)
@neondt

Interesting, but I would personally put more in the north. Laon above reims and west of rethel makes a lot of sense, plus having a non French take on lille would be nice. As your current one puts both Lille and the rest of French Flanders together while dunkirque is to this day still flemish but lille was walloon/Picard even in 1444.

That cultural split would justify a fourth province in Flanders for either dunkirque or if that's too small it could include Ypers.

I would also put more priority for a province of Verdun and Metz then Saraland and metz. Verdun could be the current metz minus metz and Metz could get Saarland as these seem more important than Saarland.
 

Entrone

Captain
Mar 27, 2016
382
425
There has been quite a few suggestions on this, but we can't have enough.

My thoughts on your maps:
Too much provinces. Way too much. I think the game doesen't need this much. Let's say Valentinois and Gapencais, just to mention two. Exactly what's their reason? Also, I don't think we should have roughly same size provinces. Like in Franche Comté, why not have a smaller Free city of Besancon instead of similar looking, boring provinces?

On the other hand, I like that you included Aunis, Foix lands, Albret and Léon. You represent appanages as accurate as possible. While I don't think the devs want it that way, they definately can check your suggestion for ideas :)

Regarding the cultures, I'm not sure we need that many either, but it would be cool to see Calais changed from Walloon, which it has never been (actually it should have been left Flemish). I'm all in for Arpitan and Auvergnat, maybe even Languedocian, but I'm not sure of the rest.
Also, Breton should remain in the French group. Even though their language may be closer to Welsh, centuries have passed since their separation, so culturally they were probably closer to the French than to the Irish, at this stage.
There was that idea about the possibility to place cultures into two group, that would be awesome in a lot of cases (Breton into French and Celtic, Welsh into British and Celtic, Slovak into Carpathian and West Slavic, Karelian into Finnic/Nordic and East Slavic etc..)

There's my version:
91419004d1d931fe82ac424e37a9656fca54f9e42b69a1afbb8f4c0c7fec9340e302fe8d.jpg

I tried to add only the most important provinces, Red got the highest priority, Green is rather there for flavour (for example Aunis was a Huguenot center).
 
Last edited:

BalticM

First Lieutenant
17 Badges
Oct 31, 2017
286
181
  • Europa Universalis IV: Cossacks
  • Crusader Kings III: Royal Edition
  • Crusader Kings III
  • Imperator: Rome
  • Europa Universalis IV: Dharma
  • Europa Universalis IV: Rule Britannia
  • Europa Universalis IV: Cradle of Civilization
  • Europa Universalis IV: Third Rome
  • Europa Universalis IV: Mare Nostrum
  • Europa Universalis IV
  • Europa Universalis IV: Common Sense
  • Europa Universalis IV: El Dorado
  • Europa Universalis IV: Res Publica
  • Europa Universalis IV: Call to arms event
  • Europa Universalis IV: Wealth of Nations
  • Europa Universalis IV: Conquest of Paradise
  • Europa Universalis IV: Art of War
I would also put more priority for a province of Verdun and Metz then Saraland and metz. Verdun could be the current metz minus metz and Metz could get Saarland as these seem more important than Saarland.

But why?
Verdun is very small territory. And concept to divide Three Bishoprics of Metz, Verdun and Toul into 2 provinces doesn't seem logical at all. Why Metz & Verdun, and not Metz & Toul then? Toul & Verdun were approx of same importance.
Duchy of Lorraine take some 60% land area in Lorraine and to give it 3 provinces out of 5 seem fair especially when it also fits historical divisions of Lorraine perfectly well. My "Saarland" province has all the needed historical reference and enables German culture province in Lorraine. Also if you give northern lands of Duchy Lorraine to Metz, then Duchy Lorraine has no border with Trier or other German provinces which is wrong.

My thoughts on your maps:
Too much provinces. Way too much. I think the game doesen't need this much. Let's say Valentinois and Gapencais, just to mention two. Exactly what's their reason? Also, I don't think we should have roughly same size provinces. Like in Franche Comté, why not have a smaller Free city of Besancon instead of similar looking, boring provinces?

I've tried to be objective and divide all corners of France in same manner.
Why Dauphine should be 1 huge 20k km2 province while approx same size Provence split into 4 provinces? Just because Toulon is more famous than Valence or Gap?
Maybe Dauphine was poor region but it had its divisions and it's not without a reason that it was split into 3 deparments after French Revolution.

I think all the middle line of Limousin-Auvergne-Lyonnais-Dauphine-Savoy is the worst represented part of France in EUIV now. I have more than doubled number of provinces there :)
 

Entrone

Captain
Mar 27, 2016
382
425
But why?
Verdun is very small territory. And concept to divide Three Bishoprics of Metz, Verdun and Toul into 2 provinces doesn't seem logical at all. Why Metz & Verdun, and not Metz & Toul then? Toul & Verdun were approx of same importance.
Duchy of Lorraine take some 60% land area in Lorraine and to give it 3 provinces out of 5 seem fair especially when it also fits historical divisions of Lorraine perfectly well. My "Saarland" province has all the needed historical reference and enables German culture province in Lorraine. Also if you give northern lands of Duchy Lorraine to Metz, then Duchy Lorraine has no border with Trier or other German provinces which is wrong.

The choice, if necessary is backed by:
-historical importance: Verdun and Metz were just more important
-clickability: Toul had the smallest area, so it should be drawn bigger than it was.

While Saarland was only a backwater province during Eu4 timeline. It had a role in international politics only in the 20th century. Also your province barely contains Saarbrücken, is too much on the south.

That's true, Duchy of Lorraine should have a border with the German states (even though not every little separate territory can be represented in the game), and it can be drawn like that if you don't aim to make rougly similar size provinces.
There's my version of the Upper Rhineland and surroundings:
60058191d4bf28b613900e7489fa5bd2297af27909d39fe13cc0bcc66a45aa27921578d0.jpg

1: Chalons, 2: Bar, 3:Verdun, 4: Arlon, 5: Luxembourg, 6: Metz, 7: Toul, 8: Nancy, 9: Zweibrücken, 10: Speyer, 11: Alsace, 12: Colmar, 13: Vesoul, 14: Besancon, 15: Poligny, 16: Bourg-en-Bresse, 17: Geneva, 18: Neuchatel, 19: Fribourg, 20: Bern, 21: Basel, 22: Luzern, 23: Como/Ticino, 24: Bregenz, 25: Konstanz, 26: Zollern/Rottweil

I admit, my Nancy looks weird, but at least it has border with Zweibrücken (OPM which I would use instead of Saarland), and we've got all the Bishoprics. Also added 1 more province to Champagne and Luxemburg, broke up Franche-Comté, added the Free City of Colmar, and the Free City/Bishopric of Speyer. To the south, Bourg-en-Bresse separated from Savoy, as France conquered it centuries earlier, then added Geneva, Neuchatel, Basel, Fribourg and Luzern to Switzerland. Vorarlberg, with Bregenz as capital carved out of Ravensburg, the remaining turned to the Free Cities ofKonstanz and Biberach. Added Zollern lands south of Württemberg with the historical capital of Hechingen.

I've tried to be objective and divide all corners of France in same manner.
Why Dauphine should be 1 huge 20k km2 province while approx same size Provence split into 4 provinces? Just because Toulon is more famous than Valence or Gap?
Maybe Dauphine was poor region but it had its divisions and it's not without a reason that it was split into 3 deparments after French Revolution.

I think all the middle line of Limousin-Auvergne-Lyonnais-Dauphine-Savoy is the worst represented part of France in EUIV now. I have more than doubled number of provinces there :)

Dauphine should stay as one big province because:
-It's not THAT big.
-Your alternative for not just 2 (which I would be okay with, but wouldnt give priority), but 3 provinces creates such a density that even some much more developed areas doesen't have.
-And yes, Toulon was a very important town historically, the most important French port on the Mediterranean before the rise of Marseille.
-While Valence and Gap were far from being too important, and devs stated they don't want to create provinces for the sake of being.

I like your map, as a county map, or 'how to divide France into similar provinces and areas', but it's completely irrealistic to implement. The main objective when you suggest provinces is, to make the game richer, add provinces that give something to the game. Not that you feel like there should be more and smaller ones.
While of course, a lot of interesting places are left out, for example from my suggestion, the point is to change the least possible on the map, with the most possible flavour added.

The reason why that area between Limousin and Dauphine is so coarse, may be that it's the widest part of the so-called Empty diagonal.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Empty_diagonal
Of course there should be less provinces in parts like that, than in the case of more important areas like Bretagne, Provence or Champagne.
I would advocate for La Marche, Forez and Gévaudan though, that should do it :)

Regarding the trade map, I think Bayonne, Limoges, Le Havre, Troyes, Clermont-Ferrand, Lille, Tours, Besancon and Emden aren't worthy of trade center. In the case of Lille and Clermont-Ferrand, they saw increase in importance with the Industrial Revolution. Emden and Le Havre has estuary modifier which is fine. I don't even understand why would Bayonne and Limoges should have one, while Tours, Besancon and Troyes, were important, it doesen't mean they were trade centers like Reims or Bordeaux. In England I would move that from Norfolk/Lincoln, which was swampy, to Kent. Hampshire and Liege are fine.
Worth mentioning that currently Cotentin, Bas-Poitou and Avignon has trade centers, which are also pretty lame..
Toulouse, Anjou, Rouen, Rennes and Toulon would be more fitting.
 
Last edited:

BalticM

First Lieutenant
17 Badges
Oct 31, 2017
286
181
  • Europa Universalis IV: Cossacks
  • Crusader Kings III: Royal Edition
  • Crusader Kings III
  • Imperator: Rome
  • Europa Universalis IV: Dharma
  • Europa Universalis IV: Rule Britannia
  • Europa Universalis IV: Cradle of Civilization
  • Europa Universalis IV: Third Rome
  • Europa Universalis IV: Mare Nostrum
  • Europa Universalis IV
  • Europa Universalis IV: Common Sense
  • Europa Universalis IV: El Dorado
  • Europa Universalis IV: Res Publica
  • Europa Universalis IV: Call to arms event
  • Europa Universalis IV: Wealth of Nations
  • Europa Universalis IV: Conquest of Paradise
  • Europa Universalis IV: Art of War
-historical importance: Verdun and Metz were just more important

It's just your opinion which is not based on anything.
In what aspect tiny land of Verdun is more important than any of the 3 historical bailliages of Duchy Lorraine?
Three Bishoprics were nowhere near as important as Duchy Lorraine in Lorraine. And to give 3 provinces to Three Bishoprics and just 1 to Duchy Lorraine is ridiculous. You have to check historical maps how it looks like and to read something about history of Lorraine.
However I agree that of provinces I made for Lorraine, Metz province should be the "main" one, most developed and etc.

Regarding the trade map, I think Bayonne, Limoges, Le Havre, Troyes, Clermont-Ferrand, Lille, Tours, Besancon and Emden aren't worthy of trade center. In the case of Lille and Clermont-Ferrand, they saw increase in importance with the Industrial Revolution. Emden and Le Havre has estuary modifier which is fine. I don't even understand why would Bayonne and Limoges should have one, while Tours, Besancon and Troyes, were important, it doesen't mean they were trade centers like Reims or Bordeaux. In England I would move that from Norfolk/Lincoln, which was swampy, to Kent. Hampshire and Liege are fine.
Worth mentioning that currently Cotentin, Bas-Poitou and Avignon has trade centers, which are also pretty lame..
Toulouse, Anjou, Rouen, Rennes and Toulon would be more fitting.

Yes, I agree that some trade centers in my suggestion are "secondary" ones. But if I understand it all correct, it's intentional to make more trade centers and so I just offered higher density of those.
Bayonne, Saint-Malo, Dieppe - all these ports have very nice trade history I was surprised to find out. While Limoges, Tours, Clermont, Besancon, Reims, yes those pale compared to Lyon or Orleans, but still were important places for trade.
And Kent commerce was nothing compared to Norwich (Norfolk) in 15-17th centuries.
 

Entrone

Captain
Mar 27, 2016
382
425
It's just your opinion which is not based on anything.
In what aspect tiny land of Verdun is more important than any of the 3 historical bailliages of Duchy Lorraine?
Three Bishoprics were nowhere near as important as Duchy Lorraine in Lorraine. And to give 3 provinces to Three Bishoprics and just 1 to Duchy Lorraine is ridiculous. You have to check historical maps how it looks like and to read something about history of Lorraine.
However I agree that of provinces I made for Lorraine, Metz province should be the "main" one, most developed and etc.

No, not my opinion. May I suggest you to read my comment once more?
I compared it to Toul, not to Lorraine.
So it's clear Metz was the most important, it was the seat of the Parlement.
So if we can have only one of the remaining two, why would I choose Verdun?
Verdun was one of the most important forts in North-eastern France, if not THE most important. So while politically it wouldn't have the edge over Toul, militarily it has.
While Toul, the smallest of them by area, is very close to Nancy, so it's just harder to represent both of them correctly.
But all of these are important just in case we've got to decide on which ones we would like to see, and as I stated, I would like them to be Three Bishoprics, not two.

I agree on that Lorraine need more than a simple province, but since we can have only 5 provinces in a state, I would go with the representation of 3 Bishoprics and Bar, next to Lorraine.
A solution could be, if there was a way to represent the powerstruggle between the Estates (clergy, nobility, bourgeoise). If the nobility takes the control of a bishopric, they may join the Duchy. If the bourgeoise, they form republic/Free city, because all the three was a Free city too. But things like this are up to the devs, I'm there for the maps.

Yes, I agree that some trade centers in my suggestion are "secondary" ones. But if I understand it all correct, it's intentional to make more trade centers and so I just offered higher density of those.
Bayonne, Saint-Malo, Dieppe - all these ports have very nice trade history I was surprised to find out. While Limoges, Tours, Clermont, Besancon, Reims, yes those pale compared to Lyon or Orleans, but still were important places for trade.
And Kent commerce was nothing compared to Norwich (Norfolk) in 15-17th centuries.

I hope so they will rework the trade centers and fix some completely wrong one, like Bas-Poitou.
But in your version there's just too much. I think you should scale it all down (both the number of provinces and trade centers). Let's say Limoges, while regional center, was nowhere in importance compared to Rouen, Reims, Bordeaux, etc, which are also lvl1 centers. Paris should definately have at least a lvl1 one, while Reims could even be lvl2.

Inland I find Toulouse, Orleans and Tours the most appealing.
Regarding the ports, you can find a few more, let's say Caen and Brest, just to mention two of them, which are currently centers as i remember. So it's a hard decision, but I think the number of seaside trade centers in the Atlantic coast of France should be around 5. Bordeaux, Nantes and Calais are obvious. I would put the estuary to Le Havre/Dieppe (i prefer the first), remove the center from there, and would make Rouen an inland center. If Aunis gets added I would pick that with La Rochelle, and the last one either Brest or Saint-Malo.

Regarding Norwhich I was surprised it was the second largest city in England, so now I'm okay with that.
 

Entrone

Captain
Mar 27, 2016
382
425
@Entrone , For splitting Alsace, wouldn't it be better to make the Free City of Strasbourg independent instead of Colmar? Colmar could be part of the Alasce tag representing the Décapole.

I chose Colmar because I think the HRE desperately needs more Free Cities. And most Bishoprics were located around Free Cities, just like the Trois Evechés or Alsace. While some of them are large enough to represent both, it's rather a rare occasion, like in the case of Alsace. But I don't think that the same place needs 2 tags, just because more than 1 estate had lands there.
I think the best solution could be, to make a way for OPMs and other smaller HRE states, to change their form of government (bishopric/republic-freecity/duchy), if an other Estate takes the control.
Let's say Alsace starts as a Bishopric. If the revolting bourgeois wrestle the control from the clergy, they can ask the Emperor to grant them Free City status, while the neighbouring Bishoprics, could get a Casus belli on them like: Restore the Bishopric of Alsace. And their new government would seek alliance with surrounding similar states, in this case the Free City of Frankfurt or Memmingen.
I could even imagine an opinion modifier depending on form of state, similarly to religion. So republics would get +10 opinion of other republics, while -10 of feudal and ecclestical states.
 

BalticM

First Lieutenant
17 Badges
Oct 31, 2017
286
181
  • Europa Universalis IV: Cossacks
  • Crusader Kings III: Royal Edition
  • Crusader Kings III
  • Imperator: Rome
  • Europa Universalis IV: Dharma
  • Europa Universalis IV: Rule Britannia
  • Europa Universalis IV: Cradle of Civilization
  • Europa Universalis IV: Third Rome
  • Europa Universalis IV: Mare Nostrum
  • Europa Universalis IV
  • Europa Universalis IV: Common Sense
  • Europa Universalis IV: El Dorado
  • Europa Universalis IV: Res Publica
  • Europa Universalis IV: Call to arms event
  • Europa Universalis IV: Wealth of Nations
  • Europa Universalis IV: Conquest of Paradise
  • Europa Universalis IV: Art of War
while Reims could even be lvl2.

I repeat - Troyes and not Reims was the main trade center in Champagne before age of railroad. Largely it's due to Champagne Fairs but also because Troyes is on Seine and provided easy access for all trade going from Lyon, Burgundy & whole Mediterranean to Paris & The Channel. While Reims is more in the north sitting on far less active trade route leading to Low Countries.
Overall there were 2 main roads connecting Mediterranean & Northwest Europe. Both went through Lyon, but first went to Paris-Rouen through Burgundy & Troyes, while 2nd went through Auvergne up the Loire to Orleans and then either to Paris or Nantes on west coast.


Regarding the ports, you can find a few more, let's say Caen and Brest, just to mention two of them, which are currently centers as i remember.

Caen was big but had very little commercial importance. No way a CoT.
Brest was 1000 inhabitants small town before 17th century with no merchant community at all. And it was developed as military port, not trade port. No way a CoT.
Toulon was also military port, not commercial one.
My French commercial port list is perfect, I tell you :) Only Calais is big maybe since it was important only under English rule.

This is nice map showing Breton trade area:
Brittany trade.png
 

Scorpene

First Lieutenant
62 Badges
Jun 5, 2015
238
208
  • Cities: Skylines - After Dark
  • Europa Universalis IV: Art of War
  • Europa Universalis IV: Conquest of Paradise
  • Europa Universalis IV: Wealth of Nations
  • Europa Universalis IV: Res Publica
  • Hearts of Iron IV: Expansion Pass
  • Stellaris: Leviathans Story Pack
  • Cities: Skylines - Natural Disasters
  • Hearts of Iron IV: Together for Victory
  • Stellaris - Path to Destruction bundle
  • Europa Universalis IV: Mandate of Heaven
  • Hearts of Iron IV: Expansion Pass
  • Surviving Mars
  • Hearts of Iron IV: Death or Dishonor
  • Stellaris: Synthetic Dawn
  • Cities: Skylines - Green Cities
  • Europa Universalis IV: Cradle of Civilization
  • Europa Universalis IV: Mare Nostrum
  • Stellaris: Apocalypse
  • Europa Universalis IV: Rule Britannia
  • Imperator: Rome
  • Cities: Skylines - Parklife
  • Stellaris: Distant Stars
  • Europa Universalis IV: Dharma
  • Surviving Mars: First Colony Edition
  • Cities: Skylines Industries
  • Stellaris: Megacorp
  • Imperator: Rome Deluxe Edition
  • Hearts of Iron IV: Cadet
  • Europa Universalis 4: Emperor
  • Stellaris: Federations
  • Cities: Skylines - Campus
  • Stellaris: Nemesis
  • Prison Architect
  • Europa Universalis IV
  • Victoria 2
  • Cities: Skylines
  • Europa Universalis IV: El Dorado
  • Mount & Blade: Warband
  • Crusader Kings II: Way of Life
  • Europa Universalis IV: Common Sense
  • Hearts of Iron IV: La Resistance
  • Battle for Bosporus
  • Europa Universalis IV: Rights of Man
  • Europa Universalis IV: Call to arms event
  • Darkest Hour
  • Europa Universalis IV: Cossacks
  • Cities: Skylines - Snowfall
  • Crusader Kings II: The Republic
  • Crusader Kings II: Rajas of India
Couldnt Vannes be considered a port of importance? However, Bayonnes and Cette (Sète) might also be considered.

Marseille becoming a crucial commercial port mainly after the second colonization (1830-1962).

I do not know how Arles should be considered, it was a great port Under the Roman rule; and thanks to the Rhone it is linked to Lyon and the South of the Loire.

That could maybe become an event for the French king "chose your commercial node", as with the vassalization of Provence, the Integration of Britanny and the reconquest of Guyenne / Labourd / Caen they might have known little révolutions.
 

Entrone

Captain
Mar 27, 2016
382
425
Couldnt Vannes be considered a port of importance? However, Bayonnes and Cette (Sète) might also be considered.

Marseille becoming a crucial commercial port mainly after the second colonization (1830-1962).

I do not know how Arles should be considered, it was a great port Under the Roman rule; and thanks to the Rhone it is linked to Lyon and the South of the Loire.

That could maybe become an event for the French king "chose your commercial node", as with the vassalization of Provence, the Integration of Britanny and the reconquest of Guyenne / Labourd / Caen they might have known little révolutions.

Cette didn't surpass 10k inhabitants in the timeframe of the game, so I don't think that's a good idea. Bayonne was important in the English age, after that rather had military importance, on the border with Spain.
You are right about Marseille, but I feel like there should be a trade center in such a prosperous region. It could represent not just Marseille, but Arles, Aix, Marseille, or all of them.

I'm ambivalent with that event, the AI manages trade very poorly. It could help France to get significant trade income from one of the coastal nodes, as currently France usually just sits on their (wrongly) quite low Champagne node. Or it could turn out to be a bad idea, by forcing France into a second rate trade power in one of the end nodes.
I would prefer a solution which makes Bordeaux node a bit more prestigious, as it harboured the main colonial ports of France's first colonial empire. So it could provide some decent inflow to Champagne, so France's trade income wouldn't be so low compared to other colonial great powers.
 

Scorpene

First Lieutenant
62 Badges
Jun 5, 2015
238
208
  • Cities: Skylines - After Dark
  • Europa Universalis IV: Art of War
  • Europa Universalis IV: Conquest of Paradise
  • Europa Universalis IV: Wealth of Nations
  • Europa Universalis IV: Res Publica
  • Hearts of Iron IV: Expansion Pass
  • Stellaris: Leviathans Story Pack
  • Cities: Skylines - Natural Disasters
  • Hearts of Iron IV: Together for Victory
  • Stellaris - Path to Destruction bundle
  • Europa Universalis IV: Mandate of Heaven
  • Hearts of Iron IV: Expansion Pass
  • Surviving Mars
  • Hearts of Iron IV: Death or Dishonor
  • Stellaris: Synthetic Dawn
  • Cities: Skylines - Green Cities
  • Europa Universalis IV: Cradle of Civilization
  • Europa Universalis IV: Mare Nostrum
  • Stellaris: Apocalypse
  • Europa Universalis IV: Rule Britannia
  • Imperator: Rome
  • Cities: Skylines - Parklife
  • Stellaris: Distant Stars
  • Europa Universalis IV: Dharma
  • Surviving Mars: First Colony Edition
  • Cities: Skylines Industries
  • Stellaris: Megacorp
  • Imperator: Rome Deluxe Edition
  • Hearts of Iron IV: Cadet
  • Europa Universalis 4: Emperor
  • Stellaris: Federations
  • Cities: Skylines - Campus
  • Stellaris: Nemesis
  • Prison Architect
  • Europa Universalis IV
  • Victoria 2
  • Cities: Skylines
  • Europa Universalis IV: El Dorado
  • Mount & Blade: Warband
  • Crusader Kings II: Way of Life
  • Europa Universalis IV: Common Sense
  • Hearts of Iron IV: La Resistance
  • Battle for Bosporus
  • Europa Universalis IV: Rights of Man
  • Europa Universalis IV: Call to arms event
  • Darkest Hour
  • Europa Universalis IV: Cossacks
  • Cities: Skylines - Snowfall
  • Crusader Kings II: The Republic
  • Crusader Kings II: Rajas of India
Cette didn't surpass 10k inhabitants in the timeframe of the game, so I don't think that's a good idea. Bayonne was important in the English age, after that rather had military importance, on the border with Spain.

Hi !
About Cette / Sète, i disagree.
It was considered a strategic stronghold by Louis XIV, it was the main Languedoc Harbour during the timeframe and by the end of it, was even the mediterranean side of the "Canal du Midi" (that Louis XIV wanted to be able for mediterranean good to go to the Atlantic without going around spain). It was heavily fortified and even visited by Vauban himself.
You are right about Marseille, but I feel like there should be a trade center in such a prosperous region. It could represent not just Marseille, but Arles, Aix, Marseille, or all of them.
I was born here :). About the name it might be Arles or Aix. Marseille would be cool for 2019 player though, as the city is much more famous than its counterparts. But Arles is definitely way more culturally linked to Provence people than Aix or even Marseilles.


I'm ambivalent with that event, the AI manages trade very poorly. It could help France to get significant trade income from one of the coastal nodes, as currently France usually just sits on their (wrongly) quite low Champagne node. Or it could turn out to be a bad idea, by forcing France into a second rate trade power in one of the end nodes.
I would prefer a solution which makes Bordeaux node a bit more prestigious, as it harboured the main colonial ports of France's first colonial empire. So it could provide some decent inflow to Champagne, so France's trade income wouldn't be so low compared to other colonial great powers.

So do I. I proposed in the grand topic of @Grand_Strategy_Gamer (= > https://forum.paradoxplaza.com/foru...er-commander-complete-naval-overhaul.1163150/ ) to give way more importance to colonial harbour
However, currently France is, as you state, way more interested in its Champagne trade node, which is probably correct in 1444. One century later, Atlantic Coast (Bayonne, Bordeaux, St Nazaire (and not Brest, which is way more recent)) have surpassed in importance and might the Champagne traders. One other century later, barbaric power are destroyed and Indian trade is starting to evolve, even in France (Lorient was one of the most important Harbour, which gave its name to the city, the first ship built there being called "Soleil d'Orient"). And the mediterranean trade also became more important with year passing.

Btw that was a great debate at the French court for almost 2 centuries, what was the best idea, investing in Americas or in India? And that could be on that basis that we could imagine an Event (support American Trade gives you whatever bonuses for Bordeaux and St Nazaire / support Indian trade gives you whatever bonuses for Vannes and Marseille?). That would be ahistorical but Moving the second bonus from Lorient / Vannes, to another French Harbour in mediterranean sea and changing the main node of France to Genoa would be a possibility?

I'm Following you anyway as my knowledge is very limited.
 

Entrone

Captain
Mar 27, 2016
382
425
Hi !
About Cette / Sète, i disagree.
It was considered a strategic stronghold by Louis XIV, it was the main Languedoc Harbour during the timeframe and by the end of it, was even the mediterranean side of the "Canal du Midi" (that Louis XIV wanted to be able for mediterranean good to go to the Atlantic without going around spain). It was heavily fortified and even visited by Vauban himself.



It was noted before, not to confuse military importance with trade importance. Vauban was a military engineer, not a trader.
Although I admit, I didn't even heard about this town before you mentioned, and a quick search didn't gave me much more information of it's stance before the canal.
But I don't think a town, which had like 7-8 thousand inhabitants in 1800, should be a trade center, like some of the most important cities of the time. I would pick Tolouse in that region, one of the most prominent cities in France since the good old days, until this day.
But having an event/mission/decision about the Canal would be interesting. It could work similarly to other existing decisionsetc.. Would cost gold, take time to build, and give some modifiers to the provinces involved. My idea is +5 trade power to Bordeaux and Narbonne. Although the Garonne part was finished later, as I red it was possible to sail from the Mediterranean to the Atlantic, depending on the Garrone's water level.
Btw that was a great debate at the French court for almost 2 centuries, what was the best idea, investing in Americas or in India? And that could be on that basis that we could imagine an Event (support American Trade gives you whatever bonuses for Bordeaux and St Nazaire / support Indian trade gives you whatever bonuses for Vannes and Marseille?). That would be ahistorical but Moving the second bonus from Lorient / Vannes, to another French Harbour in mediterranean sea and changing the main node of France to Genoa would be a possibility?

I find it a weird solution, to strenghten two ports, in both cases. But it's also an interesting event idea for France to have an event about choosing colonial focus region. I imagine it rather like,
-gaining +settlers and some modifier, for the atlantic coast/on or cities there, if France choose the Americas (occident)
or
-some trade bonuses (probably power) and modifiers to mediterranean coast/cities, if France choose Africa+Asia (orient)

This is because colonialism on the americas was driven by directly settling and growing sugar, mining, hunting for fur etc, while on the orient it was rather about trade 'exotic goods' with the locals, and mostly just trading ports were founded/captured/bought to maintain the trade, at the EU4 timeframe.
What do you think? :)
 

Scorpene

First Lieutenant
62 Badges
Jun 5, 2015
238
208
  • Cities: Skylines - After Dark
  • Europa Universalis IV: Art of War
  • Europa Universalis IV: Conquest of Paradise
  • Europa Universalis IV: Wealth of Nations
  • Europa Universalis IV: Res Publica
  • Hearts of Iron IV: Expansion Pass
  • Stellaris: Leviathans Story Pack
  • Cities: Skylines - Natural Disasters
  • Hearts of Iron IV: Together for Victory
  • Stellaris - Path to Destruction bundle
  • Europa Universalis IV: Mandate of Heaven
  • Hearts of Iron IV: Expansion Pass
  • Surviving Mars
  • Hearts of Iron IV: Death or Dishonor
  • Stellaris: Synthetic Dawn
  • Cities: Skylines - Green Cities
  • Europa Universalis IV: Cradle of Civilization
  • Europa Universalis IV: Mare Nostrum
  • Stellaris: Apocalypse
  • Europa Universalis IV: Rule Britannia
  • Imperator: Rome
  • Cities: Skylines - Parklife
  • Stellaris: Distant Stars
  • Europa Universalis IV: Dharma
  • Surviving Mars: First Colony Edition
  • Cities: Skylines Industries
  • Stellaris: Megacorp
  • Imperator: Rome Deluxe Edition
  • Hearts of Iron IV: Cadet
  • Europa Universalis 4: Emperor
  • Stellaris: Federations
  • Cities: Skylines - Campus
  • Stellaris: Nemesis
  • Prison Architect
  • Europa Universalis IV
  • Victoria 2
  • Cities: Skylines
  • Europa Universalis IV: El Dorado
  • Mount & Blade: Warband
  • Crusader Kings II: Way of Life
  • Europa Universalis IV: Common Sense
  • Hearts of Iron IV: La Resistance
  • Battle for Bosporus
  • Europa Universalis IV: Rights of Man
  • Europa Universalis IV: Call to arms event
  • Darkest Hour
  • Europa Universalis IV: Cossacks
  • Cities: Skylines - Snowfall
  • Crusader Kings II: The Republic
  • Crusader Kings II: Rajas of India

It was noted before, not to confuse military importance with trade importance. Vauban was a military engineer, not a trader.
Although I admit, I didn't even heard about this town before you mentioned, and a quick search didn't gave me much more information of it's stance before the canal.
But I don't think a town, which had like 7-8 thousand inhabitants in 1800, should be a trade center, like some of the most important cities of the time. I would pick Tolouse in that region, one of the most prominent cities in France since the good old days, until this day.
But having an event/mission/decision about the Canal would be interesting. It could work similarly to other existing decisionsetc.. Would cost gold, take time to build, and give some modifiers to the provinces involved. My idea is +5 trade power to Bordeaux and Narbonne. Although the Garonne part was finished later, as I red it was possible to sail from the Mediterranean to the Atlantic, depending on the Garrone's water level.

Vauban (and Colbert) were far more than just Military linked ministers. For instance, Vauban was the one making the canal able to work, building numerous bridge and water retinue. He was a very-talented architech, but he also had a clear vision of diplomacy. He created the Policy of the "Pré Carré", which consisted in, EUIV Wise "play tall"inside the borders of the country. Border clearly delimited by… Vauban forts, of course.

The city by itself was Indeed lowly populated, and Toulouse, which is on the canal, could be an interesting compromise (provided it stays in Genoa Trade Node).

I agree about the Canal, though i would rather add a... Production bonus, but to all the provinces involved, from Saintonge to Narbonne. As the Canal help trade and production, mainly in local area (Silk, Wine, Grain, Cattle (needed to move the ships)), but was never able to compete against Cadix/Gibraltar for the international trade. It made possible for local productions to be sold up to Nice and Marseille on one side, Nantes and Bayonne on the other.


I find it a weird solution, to strenghten two ports, in both cases. But it's also an interesting event idea for France to have an event about choosing colonial focus region. I imagine it rather like,
-gaining +settlers and some modifier, for the atlantic coast/on or cities there, if France choose the Americas (occident)
or
-some trade bonuses (probably power) and modifiers to mediterranean coast/cities, if France choose Africa+Asia (orient)

This is because colonialism on the americas was driven by directly settling and growing sugar, mining, hunting for fur etc, while on the orient it was rather about trade 'exotic goods' with the locals, and mostly just trading ports were founded/captured/bought to maintain the trade, at the EU4 timeframe.
What do you think? :)

Yeah I plainly agree. And that would allow a different playstyle from the player.
- + Settlers, + trade power (to steer colonial trade)for Bordeaux / Nantes (Americas)
- No idea for Indias. I like yours. However, some bonus for the trade companies seems obvious. I hope they will get some love in the great Update.
 

Entrone

Captain
Mar 27, 2016
382
425
Vauban (and Colbert) were far more than just Military linked ministers. For instance, Vauban was the one making the canal able to work, building numerous bridge and water retinue. He was a very-talented architech, but he also had a clear vision of diplomacy. He created the Policy of the "Pré Carré", which consisted in, EUIV Wise "play tall"inside the borders of the country. Border clearly delimited by… Vauban forts, of course.

The city by itself was Indeed lowly populated, and Toulouse, which is on the canal, could be an interesting compromise (provided it stays in Genoa Trade Node).


I'm aware of Vauban's greatness, yet it doesen't mean his works on the field of warfare (like the forts) should be represented like that. Also regarding trade, ports were rather means of transportation in lot of the cases, from rich inland regions, like Toulouse, Guyenne etc.

I agree about the Canal, though i would rather add a... Production bonus, but to all the provinces involved, from Saintonge to Narbonne. As the Canal help trade and production, mainly in local area (Silk, Wine, Grain, Cattle (needed to move the ships)), but was never able to compete against Cadix/Gibraltar for the international trade. It made possible for local productions to be sold up to Nice and Marseille on one side, Nantes and Bayonne on the other.

First, I think giving decent bonuses to all those provinces would be too overpowered.
On the other hand, if we choose to scale down the bonus and divide it into like 5-10-20 parts, of the provinces around, that would render it nearly insignificant.
That's why I would propose, giving trade bonus to the end provinces. These modifiers could be decent, but not too op, because as you mentioned, it never reached the level of importance comparable to the Straits.

I agree, it helped the region's products to reach easier, further, but it didn't directly had an impact on production, unlike on trade. After all, the canal helped the trading the goods, not manufacturing/growing. So I would still stick to trade modifiers. Production modifiers should be the likes of Murano glass or the swedish Kopparberg.
 

Scorpene

First Lieutenant
62 Badges
Jun 5, 2015
238
208
  • Cities: Skylines - After Dark
  • Europa Universalis IV: Art of War
  • Europa Universalis IV: Conquest of Paradise
  • Europa Universalis IV: Wealth of Nations
  • Europa Universalis IV: Res Publica
  • Hearts of Iron IV: Expansion Pass
  • Stellaris: Leviathans Story Pack
  • Cities: Skylines - Natural Disasters
  • Hearts of Iron IV: Together for Victory
  • Stellaris - Path to Destruction bundle
  • Europa Universalis IV: Mandate of Heaven
  • Hearts of Iron IV: Expansion Pass
  • Surviving Mars
  • Hearts of Iron IV: Death or Dishonor
  • Stellaris: Synthetic Dawn
  • Cities: Skylines - Green Cities
  • Europa Universalis IV: Cradle of Civilization
  • Europa Universalis IV: Mare Nostrum
  • Stellaris: Apocalypse
  • Europa Universalis IV: Rule Britannia
  • Imperator: Rome
  • Cities: Skylines - Parklife
  • Stellaris: Distant Stars
  • Europa Universalis IV: Dharma
  • Surviving Mars: First Colony Edition
  • Cities: Skylines Industries
  • Stellaris: Megacorp
  • Imperator: Rome Deluxe Edition
  • Hearts of Iron IV: Cadet
  • Europa Universalis 4: Emperor
  • Stellaris: Federations
  • Cities: Skylines - Campus
  • Stellaris: Nemesis
  • Prison Architect
  • Europa Universalis IV
  • Victoria 2
  • Cities: Skylines
  • Europa Universalis IV: El Dorado
  • Mount & Blade: Warband
  • Crusader Kings II: Way of Life
  • Europa Universalis IV: Common Sense
  • Hearts of Iron IV: La Resistance
  • Battle for Bosporus
  • Europa Universalis IV: Rights of Man
  • Europa Universalis IV: Call to arms event
  • Darkest Hour
  • Europa Universalis IV: Cossacks
  • Cities: Skylines - Snowfall
  • Crusader Kings II: The Republic
  • Crusader Kings II: Rajas of India
I'm aware of Vauban's greatness, yet it doesen't mean his works on the field of warfare (like the forts) should be represented like that. Also regarding trade, ports were rather means of transportation in lot of the cases, from rich inland regions, like Toulouse, Guyenne etc.

And he built, bridges, water tank, to allow the Canal to work (which is was he went to Cette). But i quasi agree with you. Maybe we could have a modifier for the provinces "Canal du Midi +XXX", and keep to Tolose the trade center. You are right.
First, I think giving decent bonuses to all those provinces would be too overpowered.
On the other hand, if we choose to scale down the bonus and divide it into like 5-10-20 parts, of the provinces around, that would render it nearly insignificant.
That's why I would propose, giving trade bonus to the end provinces. These modifiers could be decent, but not too op, because as you mentioned, it never reached the level of importance comparable to the Straits.

I agree, it helped the region's products to reach easier, further, but it didn't directly had an impact on production, unlike on trade. After all, the canal helped the trading the goods, not manufacturing/growing. So I would still stick to trade modifiers. Production modifiers should be the likes of Murano glass or the swedish Kopparberg.

I kinda not agree.
In the Royal Declaration that gave the concession to the Piquet family, it clearly states that mills, farms, and other artisan craft that would be built along the canal would belong to what was considered a fief (the Canal). And if you travel that canal, you will see plenty of mills and exploitations of the Canal that would not have been possible without it.


- The ships were horsepowered - if that mean something in English, ( which i doubt??? )- and hundreds of horses were bred just to provide power. This is the reason i spoke about cattle before.
- The hundreds (300 says Wiki) of Ship operating had to be built (they were specific to the canal) and maintained.
- The verges of the Canal were used to grow mulberry tree (mûrier) to feed the silkworms up to 1830+.


Now about the bonus scale, i didnt check the number of provinces concerned (on purpose, not to be influenced), but i'm not sure a +5% prod on every of those provinces - from Saintonge to Narbonnes - would be such a disbalancing. We have to keep in mind that the player should pay great money to build the canal (3 or 4 thousands ducats?), around 1630 /1650.

I'm not able to do a projection about the income effect our two different proposition would have, but i'm not that sure my proposal is that unbalanced.

PS :
Now i checked, it would mean a bonus implemented on 5 to 6 provinces. Dont know what the tradegoods are though