If you play at the bookmark after 1816, you will notice that France is still revolutionary with Louis XVIII as emperor. This should not be the case as after the Hundred Days War, Napoleon was defeated and the Bourbon family was restored and revolutionary France should not exist. That is why all the european countries who are at peace with Revolutionary France still have Counter-Revolution which cause -5 unrest in their province!
Paradox please correct this bug.
Louis XVIIIe should indeed not be emperor but king. That being said, after Napoleon's second fall, the Bourbon maintened most of the inovations created by the Revolution and the Empire : the Départements system, the Préfets, the abolition of old boundaries, a modernised military in which commoners could rise, an improved education system and Paris as a capital, to name just a few. France then WAS the product of the Revolution, not simply a return to pre 1789 monarchy.
I would point out that in several countries, Republican inspired revolutions errupted in the years following 1815 : Spain in 1821, and Carbonari uprisings in Italy in the same period. France itself faced another régime change in 1830, with a Republican uprising crushed in 1832, while in Belgium an independence war suceedeed with French help in gaining independence from the Dutch, and the poles tried to do the same only to be destroyed by Russian forces.
The only problem is tha flag and title. Revolt risk and "Revolutionary" seem perfectly fine to me, in the sense that France in 1815 was simply a continuation of Revolutionary France, with heavy advantages granted to the nobility and monarch.
