Chief Secretary Kirov opens the Second People's Party Congress with an address.
"Comrades, a dark shadow hangs over us. We have lost our most dearly beloved First Citizen, and without him our path forward is unclear and beset with dangers. The Commune has many challenges ahead of it, indeed it has had challenges against it since its very inception. But where we previously had the visionary leadership of the First Citizen to guide us through any hardship, now we must find a new course on our own, to honor and maintain the legacy of such a man, but even more importantly to protect and assist the thousands of loyal citizens who need the Commune. That is the goal of this congress and the reason we have gathered together today.
For the position of leadership, perhaps many expect that we should decide a new First Citizen. A new man to step up and lead us with absolute authority, ready and capable of taking any measure to protect and better the Commune. The long tenure of First Citizen Foucalt certainly stands as evidence of the benefit and desirability of such a position. From such a position of power he was capable of enacting whatever powers were needed to resolve crises and secure the wellbeing of all citizens. However I must ask you, do we really wish to have such unchecked and unrestrained powers in the hands of a single man? Is that not incredibly prone to abuse, ready to overturn the prosperity and communality of the Commune to emplace a tyrannical dictatorship to rival that of the Pitt, Nova Roma, or the WASPs?
This is no attack on First Citizen Foucalt, he was a restrained man, and his governance over the Commune has seen many rise to positions of power and act as they need to handle local issues, with broad allowances given to citizens of the Commune. Many in the Commune did not share the precise viewpoint of First Citizen Foucalt, yet he did not kill or persecute them. Many officials, particularly the General Secretaries, enacted policies without consulting the First Citizen, due to their belief in the need for immediate action, and the First Citizen let them do so unpunished. First Citizen Foucalt was a man of uncommon virtue and vision however. Where he had the power and ability to rule by decree, to crush any who would think differently than him, he saw the folly in such abuse, and he rejected such despotic means.
But with what certainty can we say that no man in the future will succumb to the temptation of absolute power? At present there is no limit to the powers of the Office of the First Citizen, giving whomever holds it the capacity to issue any command they might wish. That is a powerful temptation to any man, ripe for abuse. First Citizen Foucalt resisted and rejected such temptation, but who here is so arrogant as to think they are the equal of First Citizen Foucalt, Father of the Revolution and Founder of the Party? Certainly not I. This leaves us with but one course of action to decide the future of the Commune.
We must leave the Office of the First Citizen vacant, never to be held by another after the passing of First Citizen Foucalt. Instead a new organization of power must be created, one where checks and balances restrain the power and potential abuse of leadership, while also clear and explicitly articulating the nature and limits of power for all positions in the Commune. To do this, we must format a constitution, to provide a concrete basis to guide our state in absence of First Citizen Foucalt.
With a constitution, we would codify the powers and responsibilities of the General Secretaries, as well as other important government functionaries. Most importantly, in my proposed constitution, a new executive office would be established, to provide leadership in the Commune in absence of the Office of the First Citizen. This office would be my own, that of the Chief Secretary of the Commune. The principles of restraint I've previously mentioned would of course be applied to my office in the constitution, and it would not be unilaterally possible for the Chief Secretary to change the constitution.
Before I go into further detail of my planned constitution, I will open the floor to response to ensure we are all in agreement and on the same page before proceeding."