Gentlemen, calm yourselves; the authorship of some bill is of little concern when compared to the matter of the will of the people and the future of the constitution of this country. By persisting in this argument you trouble making politics look ineffective and petty, thus opening the door for violent revolutionaries. The public has asked for real political change at the last election, and I hope will continue to support such at the coming one also. If we do not want the country to collapse into armed militias and angry mobs, we should provide that change. We should remove ultimate power from one man. We should give the choice of the head of state to the people, not to fortune and blood. We should not squabble over such petty matters as whose hand penned a bill of little consequence. I hope you two gentlemen will move on, in the interests of reform, the people and the country.
What political change can there be though when our political system is nothing more but a game of machine politics, where one man can destroy the stability of the country while it is at war and where others will prop him up and raise their own political clout by claiming ownership of something that is not theirs?
I believe the authorship of "some bill" is of great concern, because while the bill itself may not be very important, what is important is that there is a coalition here between despotic autocrats and uncaring politicians, and they will each do their part to make sure that they keep their stranglehold, be it through destroying a stable government or through political swindling.
This system needs to be broken down and re-built from the bottom-up, or else we will be stuck in this never-ending loop.