It´s not really the death in battle that is the issue, though that does risk triggering the other event when at peace. However, I´m pretty sure about heir and ruler being general lowergin the mtth since that´s in the files, game have a tendency to follow those codes ;-)Are you sure this is correct? I'm not sure that a Burgundian King or Heir being attached, or actually dying in battle, has any effect on the event chances at all. If it does then I don't see them on the wiki.
Yeah have never been able to confirm this, since events and die roll does differ dependent on being in pool or being attached (-2 stab for leading armies instead of 1 for one). But I do assume that having them in the pool should be enough... However, Having them lead an army is kinda the only way to confirm and be sure that they ahve converted ruler/heir into a general which is why I go for thatboth king or heir being generals lower mtth by 25% each, attachment dont matter
ledger has general names for every countryIt´s not really the death in battle that is the issue, though that does risk triggering the other event when at peace. However, I´m pretty sure about heir and ruler being general lowergin the mtth since that´s in the files, game have a tendency to follow those codes ;-)
Yeah have never been able to confirm this, since events and die roll does differ dependent on being in pool or being attached (-2 stab for leading armies instead of 1 for one). But I do assume that having them in the pool should be enough... However, Having them lead an army is kinda the only way to confirm and be sure that they ahve converted ruler/heir into a general which is why I go for that![]()
Pff... who use ledger for that infoledger has general names for every country