They can't do that, since improving development was tied to the Common Sense DLC.
- 1
For the love of god, lower the coring costs.
- Thread starter Bagfisch
- Start date
-
We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
Bad idea.
Imagine bleeding 40 DIP each month, fighting a war while annexing a not-tiny vassal? Well, by the end of the war you don't have any spare DIP to make Britain give up one of its provinces bordering the Irish Sea (and another seazone, so you can fab claims on both sides) to your Ming China EZmode, even with a +7 ruler, +3 base, +3 advisor, +2 focus, and no DIP policies.
Diplo-annex needs a cost cut ASAP.
Last edited:
- 5
- 1
It would make sense to up the base to be a bit faster. Maybe 50% more than it currently is?
There are just too many necessary things other than ideas and tech that end up costing ADM points throughout the game that I end up being starved for them. I have yet to take my national focus off of ADM to keep up.
ADM - Stabilty, Coring
DIP - Diplo Annex
MIL - ??
If you are careful while expanding you dont need to supress rebels or pay dip points for peace deals. Culture conversion has always felt like more flavor than necessary.
It feels like the current design says that it's OK to blob but you need to pick the right ideas to do it. However, there are still too many other things that require ADM points that you cannot avoid to justify the increased cost to coring.
ADM - Stabilty, Coring
DIP - Diplo Annex
MIL - ??
If you are careful while expanding you dont need to supress rebels or pay dip points for peace deals. Culture conversion has always felt like more flavor than necessary.
It feels like the current design says that it's OK to blob but you need to pick the right ideas to do it. However, there are still too many other things that require ADM points that you cannot avoid to justify the increased cost to coring.
Perhaps, I guess it will have to be a EU5 thing then. Pr perhaps a free patch improvement Though it seems odd I'll give you that.
Last edited:
As in 50% less of a cost, or you use 50% more diplo points? Personally, I'd only agree to the latter if the player is allowed to control how many diplo points are being invested into the diplo annexation per month. I don't want to spend 18 DP a month and then not being able to demand what I want in wars.
Well you tend to cap out around 4-8 points per month, a 50% increase of that would put you up to 6-12 points per month.
Or make diplo-annex not use a diplomat to maintain the integration and don't add back the diplomat from the embassy.
- 1
Fighting wars is more boring than sitting there watching the timer tick by.
...
...
...
...watching grass grow without using a microscope must make you cream yourself then. That's the only conclusion you can draw from that.
This development thing won't make any more people play past 1650, because unless you full retarded, after that point there's no challenge even if you initially began as Ryukyu.
- 1
I usually stop playing after the Protestant league war. I've usually 'won' enough by then.
I play in hard , ai bonuses with historical lucky nations and the game past 1500 im already a blob , the only way i enjoy the game is going to defines and making everything even harder , i see post like this (slap face).
- 1
My 2 cents:
In my current game Castille took half of Aragon and Muscovy most of Novgorod and one or two provinces out of Golden Horde. Both of them are still at admin tech 3 (and year is almost 1480)
In my current game Castille took half of Aragon and Muscovy most of Novgorod and one or two provinces out of Golden Horde. Both of them are still at admin tech 3 (and year is almost 1480)