for non-christians foreign Dynasties shouldnt be

[celethiel]

IE for instanceif i am playing Ardabil, whether or not i form Persia, I shouldnt Get a Timurid on my throne if i die without an heir....
and I think it especially shouldn't happen in the Case of Religious Theocracy...
I doubt a Persia or Ardabil having a Zeno-Religious-Nationalistic Government Which you have made Persia and Ardabil out to be, would be accepting AT ALL of a foriegner Dynasty getting on their throne... Especially one related to The Timurids, the Mongols or the Qara, or any other Tribal culture most likely, heck i doubt they'd accept one related to Mohammed if it was from the Sunni Branch of the Family.
In general the way you have had Muslims work in ck 2 supports the idea of in house dynasties being more acceptable to the country that Someone's Wive's/mother's cousins. I don't know that there is even a historical basis outside of Christianity for Someone inheriting a country into their dynasty for that....
Also if i am playing a Safarvid of Ardabil or anywhere else i am not going to want to have the Timurid family on my throne.
(i was playing ardabil to get the Shahansha achievement... i got it then lost the dynasty to the Timurids (and worst was he's (the timurid ruler) the best ruler I had... 5,4,5 or something... and the Ardabil Safarvids were all HORRID admin people... i still hadn't gotten my 3rd adm tech by that point... at close to 1500 (and i took Admin and couldn't actually pull an admin idea out(i also got LOTS of adm draining events and expanded very aggressively but i don't think there was once they were over 2 adm)).
I don't know if i should put this in suggestions, but this being said, i still don't think any Persia would accept a Timurid on their Throne, after having fought to liberate themselves from one, even if the Emperor was married to that extensive family

 

[makaramus]

IE for instanceif i am playing Ardabil, whether or not i form Persia, I shouldnt Get a Timurid on my throne if i die without an heir....
and I think it especially shouldn't happen in the Case of Religious Theocracy...
I doubt a Persia or Ardabil having a Zeno-Religious-Nationalistic Government Which you have made Persia and Ardabil out to be, would be accepting AT ALL of a foriegner Dynasty getting on their throne... Especially one related to The Timurids, the Mongols or the Qara, or any other Tribal culture most likely, heck i doubt they'd accept one related to Mohammed if it was from the Sunni Branch of the Family.
In general the way you have had Muslims work in ck 2 supports the idea of in house dynasties being more acceptable to the country that Someone's Wive's/mother's cousins. I don't know that there is even a historical basis outside of Christianity for Someone inheriting a country into their dynasty for that....
Also if i am playing a Safarvid of Ardabil or anywhere else i am not going to want to have the Timurid family on my throne.
(i was playing ardabil to get the Shahansha achievement... i got it then lost the dynasty to the Timurids (and worst was he's (the timurid ruler) the best ruler I had... 5,4,5 or something... and the Ardabil Safarvids were all HORRID admin people... i still hadn't gotten my 3rd adm tech by that point... at close to 1500 (and i took Admin and couldn't actually pull an admin idea out(i also got LOTS of adm draining events and expanded very aggressively but i don't think there was once they were over 2 adm)).
I don't know if i should put this in suggestions, but this being said, i still don't think any Persia would accept a Timurid on their Throne, after having fought to liberate themselves from one, even if the Emperor was married to that extensive family

as I know there are events that giving you persian ruler after you form persia

 

[celethiel]

as I know there are events that giving you persian ruler after you form persia

Good, i don't want to have A timurid on the Throne, i am playing as Persia not the Timurid Empire.... it annoyed me, (i have honestly always hated loosing my rulers in that game...especially if they were say the Hohenzollerns or the Safarvids and i get say the Habsburgs or Timurids or something to replace them)

 

[makaramus]

Good, i don't want to have A timurid on the Throne, i am playing as Persia not the Timurid Empire.... it annoyed me, (i have honestly always hated loosing my rulers in that game...especially if they were say the Hohenzollerns or the Safarvids and i get say the Habsburgs or Timurids or something to replace them)

I am not sure ofcourse in my QQ ->Persia game I had a event replacing my Afghan ruler with persian one if I desired

but also in another sense it makes sense timurid ruling persians think like this: What if timurid ruler was the one liberated persian people? Wont they follow their that leader then?

 

[Bebou]

Not really 100% on topic but I really would love for there to be an event for Persia to get the Safavid's on the throne. I am not sure if this was added in CoC but if not it is such a shame. They were such an important part of the region yet feel non existent unless you start from a later date :/

 

[I_am_Nemo]

Not really 100% on topic but I really would love for there to be an event for Persia to get the Safavid's on the throne. I am not sure if this was added in CoC but if not it is such a shame. They were such an important part of the region yet feel non existent unless you start from a later date :/

They're plenty existent if you Ardabil > Persia - Ardabil starts with Safavids.

Otherwise, there are a couple "Great women in history" events that give you the option of a Safavid. Not 100% sure, but I /think/ heirs generated while one of them is ruler will be Safavid.