Was puzzling over why certain areas of my city were downsizing; tall tenements and office blocks downgrading to small buildings and houses, and yet other areas of the city where I'd laid transport were not downsizing at all.
I initially thought it was due to the economy; I was in the middle of a large period of negative growth when I first noticed the downsizing.
However, the economy soon picked up, positive growth returned, yet those areas that downsized did not recover, they remained suburban.
Suddenly it hit me, the ONLY areas that had downsized were the ONLY areas where I'd built bus or trolley-bus routes. The areas where I'd built trams and metro stations had not downsized at all.
Arguably, this makes sense. Buses, with their inherent lower capacities, are better serving areas of sparse population. Trams and metros, with higher capacities, are better serving urban areas of high population.
The fact that the city responds to the type of transport you build is ... interesting ... and some would say a bit arse over tit - surely transport would naturally be built to suit the environment, rather than the type of environment changing to suit the transport provided.
But anyway, glad I've figured this aspect out - it was bugging me.
Now I need to find out if installing a tram or metro in a purely suburban area will manifest urban growth.
I initially thought it was due to the economy; I was in the middle of a large period of negative growth when I first noticed the downsizing.
However, the economy soon picked up, positive growth returned, yet those areas that downsized did not recover, they remained suburban.
Suddenly it hit me, the ONLY areas that had downsized were the ONLY areas where I'd built bus or trolley-bus routes. The areas where I'd built trams and metro stations had not downsized at all.
Arguably, this makes sense. Buses, with their inherent lower capacities, are better serving areas of sparse population. Trams and metros, with higher capacities, are better serving urban areas of high population.
The fact that the city responds to the type of transport you build is ... interesting ... and some would say a bit arse over tit - surely transport would naturally be built to suit the environment, rather than the type of environment changing to suit the transport provided.
But anyway, glad I've figured this aspect out - it was bugging me.
Now I need to find out if installing a tram or metro in a purely suburban area will manifest urban growth.