[Feedback Request] New Engine Features Survey for Patch 1.04

[Limith]

Please head to This Google Form and provide us your feedback!

Danielshannon will be in charge of another survey later on with more recent requests that we have not had the time to take a look at yet.

 

[lanodaka]

Add required percentage to tool-tip of area and region triggers *

what the hell do you mean by that?

 

[Limith]

what the hell do you mean by that?

Err...currently the tooltip doesn't tell you the % you need to control/own for triggers that check if you own X% of a region.

 

[Andrei Gijgorev]

This is really cool.

 

[Limith]

Regarding the question of new features you oppose, put 1 as the importance, it will be treated as basically an opposition (don't leave it blank), I will be doing some analysis with standard deviation to rank the features in terms of total vote and average vote, and consensus. Feel free to mention which ones you dislike in the last comment box.

 

[Andrei Gijgorev]

Regarding the question of new features you oppose, put 1 as the importance [...] Feel free to mention which ones you dislike in the last comment box.

That's precisely what I did.

Good to have a convention, though. This SD system will work better if people are aware that lowest importance doubles as opposition.

 

[Marshall18]

Done

I really like that you guys are doing it this way.

 

[Kretoxian]

Ok, who wrote just "Derp" in the comments field?

 

[Limith]

Ok, who wrote just "Derp" in the comments field?

No idea.

Incidentally, given the survey can only be accessed by registered PI people (currently), I will be attempting to verify usernames I don't recognize as actual members on PI, so if you want your votes to count, please put your actual username. If the survey gets posted elsewhere as well though, I will have to find some other way of verifying votes are real and not duplicates.

PLEASE do not submit joke answers or twice (of course, given that I just said not to, someone is bound to :/ ), the survey is primarily intended for us to know the community's wishes better, so if someone does, they are only harming themselves.

_____________
On a positive note, happy to see so many responses so fast!

 

[dannyboy2016]

What do you mean by moddable amount of TAG? Do you mean that modders could increase the number of country tags (at the expense of slowing down the game?)

 

[LiamRiordan]

Submitted, nice to see one or two things I suggested are in there VOTE FOR THEEEEM

 

[Gukpa]

First we really need to place the option : Victory or Wahalla,not only because is Realistic (used MANY times for Germany and Japan,even by Stalin in 1942,no one step back) the DH really lacks this option and must have it

And Second,add the option to liberate Russia as Germany,as requested in this thread : http://forum.paradoxplaza.com/forum/showthread.php?685901-Russia

 

[Limith]

What do you mean by moddable amount of TAG? Do you mean that modders could increase the number of country tags (at the expense of slowing down the game?)

Yes

 

[Andrei Gijgorev]

Why would more tags slow down the game even when not existing as countries on the map?

 

[Limith]

Why would more tags slow down the game even when not existing as countries on the map?

The way the engine works is that it will check things for those countries even when they don't exist. Something like that. Anyway, Martin said that more tags is guaranteed to slow the game even if they don't exist. I'm not sure about the exact workings underneath since I don't have access to the source code. By making the amount moddable, the idea is that modders can then define exactly the amount of tags they need, as well as define what the tags are (so you can remember them easier instead of looking up what U00-U99 are)

 

[Andrei Gijgorev]

If that's how it works, this would effectively make the game faster for mods that don't use all tags and thus can remove unused tags completely, so I'm even more in favour of it.

 

[Gukpa]

Limith,about My two suggestions?

 

[Limith]

Limith,about My two suggestions?

The second suggestion is not a game engine change. Notice the survey says Engine Features.

The first suggestion was rejected by the team multiple times, so no, we are not adding it.

 

[Gukpa]

The second suggestion is not a game engine change. Notice the survey says Engine Features.

The first suggestion was rejected by the team multiple times, so no, we are not adding it.

Sad,but thank you :closedeyes:

 

[Kretoxian]

Is there any way to see the results without having to take the survey again?