• We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.

Scourgeclaw

Fox Admiral
40 Badges
Apr 26, 2016
352
545
  • Crusader Kings II
  • Crusader Kings II: Reapers Due
  • Stellaris: Synthetic Dawn
  • Magicka
  • Crusader Kings II: Sword of Islam
  • Crusader Kings II: Sunset Invasion
  • Crusader Kings II: Sons of Abraham
  • Crusader Kings II: The Republic
  • Crusader Kings II: Rajas of India
  • Crusader Kings II: The Old Gods
  • Crusader Kings II: Legacy of Rome
  • Crusader Kings II: Charlemagne
  • Stellaris: Nemesis
  • BATTLETECH - Digital Deluxe Edition
  • Stellaris: Distant Stars
  • Stellaris: Megacorp
  • Crusader Kings II: Holy Fury
  • Stellaris: Apocalypse
  • Prison Architect
  • Stellaris: Ancient Relics
  • BATTLETECH: Season pass
  • Stellaris: Lithoids
  • BATTLETECH: Heavy Metal
  • Stellaris: Federations
  • Stellaris: Necroids
  • Ancient Space
  • Stellaris: Humanoids Species Pack
  • Crusader Kings II: Jade Dragon
  • BATTLETECH
  • Stellaris - Path to Destruction bundle
  • Crusader Kings II: Monks and Mystics
  • Stellaris: Leviathans Story Pack
  • Stellaris: Digital Anniversary Edition
  • Stellaris: Galaxy Edition
  • Stellaris: Galaxy Edition
  • Stellaris
  • Crusader Kings II: Conclave
  • Crusader Kings II: Way of Life
  • Europa Universalis IV
  • BATTLETECH: Flashpoint
I've always found it a bit odd that no matter the governing ethics and government forms of a given alliance, all nations involved get equal voting on matters

To me it would stand to reason that an alliance's decision-making process would reflect the government types of the nations involved. So for example:

an alliance composed of authoritarian empires would elect a leader-nation that would get complete oversight over all affairs until such a time as a leader character dies (or alternatively, select leaders for specific roles: one leader gets military authority to control the fed fleet, one controls who joins the alliance, etc)

Meanwhile a more oligarchical oriented alliance would work much the same as the current system, wherein the leaderships of each nation get a single vote

and an alliance of egalitarian nations would decide matters based on population numbers- so leaders would decide how those votes are cast and then their population numbers weigh how powerful their votes are


Thoughts?
 

Jabby

Colonel
33 Badges
Sep 5, 2016
824
104
  • Stellaris: Leviathans Story Pack
  • Crusader Kings II: Holy Fury
  • Stellaris: Distant Stars
  • Stellaris: Apocalypse
  • Stellaris: Humanoids Species Pack
  • Hearts of Iron IV: Expansion Pass
  • Crusader Kings II: Jade Dragon
  • Imperator: Rome Sign Up
  • Hearts of Iron IV: Death or Dishonor
  • Stellaris: Ancient Relics
  • Crusader Kings II: Monks and Mystics
  • Hearts of Iron IV: Together for Victory
  • Stellaris: Digital Anniversary Edition
  • Crusader Kings II: Reapers Due
  • Hearts of Iron IV: Cadet
  • Stellaris: Galaxy Edition
  • Stellaris: Galaxy Edition
  • Stellaris
  • Crusader Kings II: Conclave
  • Crusader Kings II: Way of Life
  • Stellaris: Lithoids
  • Stellaris: Federations
  • Stellaris: Necroids
  • Stellaris: Nemesis
  • Stellaris - Path to Destruction bundle
  • Hearts of Iron IV: Expansion Pass
  • Stellaris: Megacorp
  • Stellaris: Synthetic Dawn
  • Crusader Kings II
  • Crusader Kings II: Sunset Invasion
  • Crusader Kings II: Sons of Abraham
  • Crusader Kings II: The Old Gods
  • Crusader Kings II: Legacy of Rome
I like this idea. It could also be that the strongest empire gets the biggest say. Also i think federation planets would be a good idea or even federation orbitals. Then each empire could have to pay tax to the federation which is used to develop the fed fleet and planets