Event abdication without hire shouldn't be possible

  • We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
Showing developer posts only. Show all posts in this thread.

Trin Tragula

Design Lead - Crusader Kings 3
Paradox Staff
28 Badges
Aug 1, 2003
6.532
13.768
  • Victoria: Revolutions
  • IPO Investor
  • Paradox Order
  • Mount & Blade: Warband
  • Europa Universalis IV: Pre-order
  • Crusader Kings II: Holy Knight (pre-order)
  • 500k Club
  • 200k Club
  • Victoria 2: Heart of Darkness
  • Victoria 2: A House Divided
  • Victoria 2
  • Sengoku
  • Semper Fi
  • Rome Gold
  • Arsenal of Democracy
  • Europa Universalis III Complete
  • March of the Eagles
  • Magicka
  • Europa Universalis III Complete
  • Heir to the Throne
  • Hearts of Iron III
  • For the Motherland
  • For The Glory
  • Europa Universalis IV
  • Divine Wind
  • Europa Universalis III Complete
  • Deus Vult
  • Crusader Kings II
Her abdication did lead to a dynasty switch historically (Karl X Gustav was a Wittelsbach and iirc he still did hold a separate title with some land in the HRE). She didn't really have an heir in game terms but she did actively abdicate in his favor.

In game terms I think your encounter with this event worked out closer to history than it would've with an heir really.

Balance wise you know you lack an heir when you pick options and would likely take it into account, it's fine for events to be situational.
It could still be fun to add more options here though (for instance actually offering you to abdicate in her cousins favor).
 
  • 4
Reactions: