Europe Unleashed: Raiders of the Lost Ark

[Fredrik82]

This thread has been purged of it's spam.
The board rules are there to be followed, this is not the OT forum, and it should not be treated as such.

Now back to your regularly schedualed show.

:rofl:
Ryo, it looks like you'll have to move to the OT forum, you'r in no MP games AFAIK, so you'r only chance to reach 3000 post is to post there ,
No wait, OT don't increase the postcounter, we need players in the new order game i belive and in DbD, you'r welcome to join

 

[Fredrik82]

Oh btw, i'm up to take Russia in this game if the languish game is dead...

 

[Hive]

but you don't give a reason to it? Hell why not block the dutch ports if you can.

It's to keep the colonial wars in the colonies, devil... you might as well ask "why not sack their capital, if you can?" - and then the colonial war concept is dead...

 

[Hive]

Oh btw, i'm up to take Russia in this game if the languish game is dead...

Russia is surprisingly popular, you are the 3rd or 4th guy talking about it now.... odd.

 

[unmerged(27214)]

I'm always up for a game where I'd end up serving as the token n00b.

 

[devil]

Oh btw, i'm up to take Russia in this game if the languish game is dead...

ok if you are in, then I want venice, porto or another minor.

Acutally I don't care which nation, whatever is close to a hypertecher, I can irritate.

 

[arcorelli]

Russia is surprisingly popular, you are the 3rd or 4th guy talking about it now.... odd.

Well, they are very fun to play. Anyway, we need to solve the most important problem: No one wants to play Spain it seems. (And other nations like France were only mentioned by one person that wants other country too). So, dear co-GM how we will solve this problem?

Anyway, I think that people that has showed interest in the game but has not posted a list of countries should do that, to be able to start assigning nations (or at least, some preliminary proposals)

 

[unmerged(511)]

How many players do you want?

 

[Hive]

How many players do you want?

Around 14. Want in?

 

[Hive]

Well, they are very fun to play. Anyway, we need to solve the most important problem: No one wants to play Spain it seems. (And other nations like France were only mentioned by one person that wants other country too). So, dear co-GM how we will solve this problem?

Easy enough: forceful assigning.

Not everyone can play Russia anyway...

 

[unmerged(511)]

Around 14. Want in?

Depends on what happens to the Languish game.. But I'm interested in Portugal or Sweden.

 

[Fredrik82]

Depends on what happens to the Languish game.. But I'm interested in Portugal or Sweden.

I think that game is more or less dead now

 

[unmerged(10630)]

I'm still available to play venice, even if i'll soon flight for a couple of weeks to iceland to holiday, i hope this game will beginn after.

 

[feanor73]

I'm Ok to be in

Order of choice :
1/ Spain
2/ France
3/ Sweden

My ICQ is 311456524

 

[Adam B.]

Hive, give me everything exept a land nation.

I would prefer a colonizer.

Spain or England would be lovely.

 

[PJL]

I have just thought of a very interesting yet simple rule for warring -many wars were either inheritance wars or ones over claimed land (and in some cases a mixture of both).

So why not have a rule where you must always ask for claimed land first (ones with CB shields). Only when you have all your CB shields, can you claim for non CB shield land. You can of course still force-vassalise countries with which you have no claims on.

 

[Owen]

I have just thought of a very interesting yet simple rule for warring -many wars were either inheritance wars or ones over claimed land (and in some cases a mixture of both).

So why not have a rule where you must always ask for claimed land first (ones with CB shields). Only when you have all your CB shields, can you claim for non CB shield land. You can of course still force-vassalise countries with which you have no claims on.

Well, on the up side, it stops the exploit where nations try to keep a permanent CB on their enemy while still taking provinces. On the down side, it makes wars more predictable. As I generally like to see as few rules as possible, I'd disagree with this rule, but I do think it's an interesting idea.

 

[Hive]

I have just thought of a very interesting yet simple rule for warring -many wars were either inheritance wars or ones over claimed land (and in some cases a mixture of both).

So why not have a rule where you must always ask for claimed land first (ones with CB shields). Only when you have all your CB shields, can you claim for non CB shield land. You can of course still force-vassalise countries with which you have no claims on.

So as long as Russia holds Ingermanland, Sweden can't invade Norway?

 

[TheArchduke]

So as long as Russia holds Ingermanland, Sweden can't invade Norway?

If Russia owns Norway, Sweden should probably get claims on it!

 

[Rezag]

I have just thought of a very interesting yet simple rule for warring -many wars were either inheritance wars or ones over claimed land (and in some cases a mixture of both).

So why not have a rule where you must always ask for claimed land first (ones with CB shields). Only when you have all your CB shields, can you claim for non CB shield land. You can of course still force-vassalise countries with which you have no claims on.

This sounds interesting for one thing it would allso prevent OE from going to all africa & Persia before it has dealt with europe .