-
We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
Ok. I called my ISP, and they said that their net was screwed up all over Sweden. I just got in 10 minutes ago, and I hope it'll work out... Well. Seems you guys had a good session, even without me... *wonders if that is possible 
*...
*...
Forum page finally working for me after days of trying...
I won't be able to play on Friday due to lots of things - I'm very stressed atm. I would, therefore, like to postpone the session one week, unless you all object and want to play on. I hope you understand.
Named "Evil Follower" by Austrian propaganda... hmm... Surely you can do better, Maciej
/SGA
I won't be able to play on Friday due to lots of things - I'm very stressed atm. I would, therefore, like to postpone the session one week, unless you all object and want to play on. I hope you understand.
Named "Evil Follower" by Austrian propaganda... hmm... Surely you can do better, Maciej
/SGA
Huh, in fact it is me who named you so
OK, we play next week then. But generally, we should play 2 times a week. One is definitly too rarely for me
Maybe we can move the game this week -> on Thursday or Saturday?
OK, we play next week then. But generally, we should play 2 times a week. One is definitly too rarely for me
Maybe we can move the game this week -> on Thursday or Saturday?
Any other day then friday is a no-no for me.
maybe we shoudl think about a 3 weeks on 1 week off system? We play 3 weeks and take the fourth off.
maybe we shoudl think about a 3 weeks on 1 week off system? We play 3 weeks and take the fourth off.
"Evil Follower" is not Austrian propaganda. Austrian propaganda calls French Untermensch . Just kidding.
. Just kidding.
Triangle said:Huh, in fact it is me who named you so
OK, we play next week then. But generally, we should play 2 times a week. One is definitly too rarely for me
Maybe we can move the game this week -> on Thursday or Saturday?
Once a week is enough for me
Triangle said:As the last time we've edited savegame in order to finish Polish-Scandinavian war, it would be great to do so also this time. I mean of course Polish-Turks war. It's pointelss, I'm sure no live player would do that
If the same is done for the Russian-Scandinavian war
Actually I'm not for editing out the wars (the Polish-Scandinavian war was edited out before I could comment). Those wars were induced by game factors (high BB, small army) and thus could have been avoided.
Anyways i want to hear the opion of other players on this subject.
Triangle said:
We stated our war goals at the beginning of the war. The Scandinavian alliance felt that the Polish-Austrian alliance was expanding rapidly and should be stopped before it was to late.
Editing out which wars?
For my 5 cents cant see why wars deliberately started by players should be editied out of the game.. if people want to make peace by all means do so, Wars between Temporary AI nations and players can also easily be ended once play resumes presuming all players are present, though im not totally against such edits.
Otherwise are we or are we not playing Friday?
Kris
(Back from falling down Austrian Mountians in thick Fog)
For my 5 cents cant see why wars deliberately started by players should be editied out of the game.. if people want to make peace by all means do so, Wars between Temporary AI nations and players can also easily be ended once play resumes presuming all players are present, though im not totally against such edits.
Otherwise are we or are we not playing Friday?
Kris
(Back from falling down Austrian Mountians in thick Fog
)
Yes I agree on that the OE player can quickly WP Poland if he wants to. If not, Poland has a big problem on his hands .
.OK, OK, it was just an attempt, I won't insist
But, you know, as a digresson, it's a bit unfair an illogical. When we play in MP, every action should be made with reflexions and with considerating consequences. AI don't know about this...
OE AI dowed me, so everyone looks at it as on an normal action. OK. But then, live player takes advantage on it. So, does it give me right to say in future, that OE backstabbed me, DOW'ed without reason etc.? Can I make live player, which will take OE now, responsible for this?
But, you know, as a digresson, it's a bit unfair an illogical. When we play in MP, every action should be made with reflexions and with considerating consequences. AI don't know about this...
OE AI dowed me, so everyone looks at it as on an normal action. OK. But then, live player takes advantage on it. So, does it give me right to say in future, that OE backstabbed me, DOW'ed without reason etc.? Can I make live player, which will take OE now, responsible for this?
Well on could argue
that a player unable to play who doesnt organise a sub in effect chosses the AI to be his sub and is therefore responsible for the actions of the AI.
Still if I was The OE Id be more inclinded to consider the current state of the Balance of Power in Europe as well as my own strategic position.
that a player unable to play who doesnt organise a sub in effect chosses the AI to be his sub and is therefore responsible for the actions of the AI.
Still if I was The OE Id be more inclinded to consider the current state of the Balance of Power in Europe as well as my own strategic position.
The OE player will be responsible for the war if he chooses to continue it; that's my idea perception of the matter. It means responsible as if he had started a new war directly on the start of this session.
I just recieved Victoria. So now i realy want to take a week off, so i can try out the game.
Well anyway the extra war with OE will help us with our war with Austria and Poland....... so it should stay........It should be Evil Eels choice if he wants to continue the war or not