Europa Universalis IV: Wealth of Nations – Dev diary 7: Free Features #1
- Thread starter Johan
- Start date
-
We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
Will the Myaphysites in CKII be converted correctly or still become Orthodox?
really quick question on the grand armada: could you take tons of loans, build 500 big ones, and go bankrupt to get achievo?
That's something that the CKII team would resolve, not the EUIV team.
Why didn't I notice this? :huh:
Well after Rajas of India all Indian cultures STILL convert to no_culture so.... I wouldn't count on it
Are olonial nations going to be tweaked? They absolutely need it. At least to see some of them pushing for independence
+all of the 1's. Though, tbh, I bet they're planning some "nationalism" DLC eventually that would probably involve this.
This. I've played three games to the end since CoP and I've never seen a CN try to revolt, even when their overlord was all tiny and weakened. Even reaching 50% liberty desire is pretty rare.
Still would love to see some Georgia ideas around spying, innovation, and defense <3
I think it's some sort of Swedish voodoo magic to protect against bad luck.
I like formable nations, but.....
1. To form Kurland, you just tech up as LO, or take 2 provinces as Riga and change to Protestantism.
2. To form Egypt, you just sit there and tech up.....
3. To form the last one, you can only do it as the Uzbeks, and you lose some land in the process.
I do appreciate the hard work from PDS, but can we have nations that are more of a challenge to form? Maybe think outside of the box and make a formable nation that was ''historically accurate'', but maybe have one that was feasible at the time.
1. To form Kurland, you just tech up as LO, or take 2 provinces as Riga and change to Protestantism.
2. To form Egypt, you just sit there and tech up.....
3. To form the last one, you can only do it as the Uzbeks, and you lose some land in the process.
I do appreciate the hard work from PDS, but can we have nations that are more of a challenge to form? Maybe think outside of the box and make a formable nation that was ''historically accurate'', but maybe have one that was feasible at the time.
Well, the Duchy of Kurland was formed after Livonian Order lost most of its land, similarly to the Teoutonic Order and the Duchy of Prussia, so it fits that they don't need to conquer anything.
Probably more the colloquialism "knock on wood" -- basically something you say because you don't want to "jinx" yourself and make it not happen by saying it will. A sort of pseudo-superstition.
I'd love some more easy achievments. I mean, I know it should be a challenge, but not all of them. With CoP there was at least 2 easy ones (5 colonial nations and 100% patriarchal authority) for 5, maybe 7 total. Now it's 2/10, + 1 which is basicly luck. Also as for the bukhara: If Uzbek would manage to westernize before would it change the tech group to musilim as well?
As for 2: and You try to survive the inevitable OE attacks. Thet the hardest FC in this patch imho.
As for 3: But You get much better tech group. Burgundy loses half of them in process of creating Netherlands, thats frustrating.
As for 1: a lot of countries are very easy to form (Scandinavia as Denmark is basicly not losing the PU, it's just a diplomat to get the relation high)
As for 2: and You try to survive the inevitable OE attacks. Thet the hardest FC in this patch imho.
As for 3: But You get much better tech group. Burgundy loses half of them in process of creating Netherlands, thats frustrating.
Uzbek---> Bukhara sounds fun, push back the Timurids, convert to Bukhara and then resist against Russia, will try it