It'd add a slight snowballing effect on your MP at that point, I'd assume.But what happens when I'm so large I have no real rivals?
There was a mixup about which features would be discussed when, so I'm afraid details won't be until later. Although we can confirm now (as most of you probably suspected) that there will be Sikhism.
But what happens when I'm so large I have no real rivals?
I really like the possibility of trade wars with massive TP as the reward but I feel I have to bring up that wars in EU4 are kinda.. annoying. I believe that trade wars should be more 'local' otherwise no one would realistically declare them. The web of alliances can easily create an ugly and unfun situation and if the 2-3PM whose TP you want is to rally half of Europe for its trade interests and you have to fight that, why not conquer/vassalize them at first place instead of just getting TP? After all, given that the game scales well only with province count you are indeed being too generous for wanting only their TP. Also will we be able to easily request TP (talking about 50% at least) from larger nations if say we have a PU or they're our vassal, or will large nations be coded to never accept that, no matter their relationship with the country that asks for it?
Then you'll slowly succumb due to decadence and/or inner turmoil, like all great empires eventually did.
But you only look strong vis-a-vis them if you fight wars against them.
While I do really like this new system, shouldn't the power projection replace prestige? Not only does the name fit better, it would also be weird if your power projection is really low (aka: you look weak in eyes of your peers), but your prestige would be high (aka: people are in awe of you).
This diary has completely sold me the expansion. I'll be preordering.
What a ridiculous post. Hope you got paid enough.
You should ask more of your gaming companies rather than the absolute minimum.