Hello Johan,
Thanks for the diary. I had one concern with the previous game, and it didn't change: It looks like winning sieges is just a matter of time, if there is no relieving army, the city will eventually fall, but in reality this was not at all the case, there are several sieges where the defending party "defeated" the attackers, and they gave up the siege, and retreated. I think this should be possible if the defenders have a high defensiveness, high morale (or high piety if you like) you should be able to defeat the enemy's morale, and "win".
Thanks for the diary. I had one concern with the previous game, and it didn't change: It looks like winning sieges is just a matter of time, if there is no relieving army, the city will eventually fall, but in reality this was not at all the case, there are several sieges where the defending party "defeated" the attackers, and they gave up the siege, and retreated. I think this should be possible if the defenders have a high defensiveness, high morale (or high piety if you like) you should be able to defeat the enemy's morale, and "win".