-
We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
Originally posted by Greven
Actually guys,
I know you are all joking, but I have to say this so that no one thinks I am creating hoax.
I never implied that there would be an EU3. No one could know such a thing. The 'has to wait for EU3' thingy was a phrase that got stuck during the beta of EU1. It was the standardized answer when one got a clear and simple...'I DON'T WANT YOUR SILLY FEATURE!!' from out Own Magicus Universalis, Johan Andersson...
/Greven
Wouldnt the logic thing be "has to wait for EU2" when you were testing EU1??!!
Originally posted by Carolus Rex
Wouldnt the logic thing be "has to wait for EU2" when you were testing EU1??!!
Yeeeeezzzz. That WOULD have been the logic
/Greven
How long should EU3 last? I think that the time around the German Unification would be nice, but I don't want a Roman scenario though. The colonial element would be too dificult to impliment, the diplomacy worked differently, and the tribes would have to attack every now and again. (The world map would also be useless.)
I want an EU III around the Roman era. Starting at around -500 till fall West Roman Empire
I want an EU III around the Roman era.[/QUOTE]
I wouldn't enjoy that too much. There isn't any real compition. How many major nations were there during that time? The entire game would be don't make an empire larger then you can defend.
I wouldn't enjoy that too much. There isn't any real compition. How many major nations were there during that time? The entire game would be don't make an empire larger then you can defend.
Aye ok... The question that rises then: Which era should they take???
Medieval? Nope --> Too chaotic, too many small empires
Post-Napoleon? Nope --> Too short
Medieval? Nope --> Too chaotic, too many small empires
Post-Napoleon? Nope --> Too short
What kinda heretic are u ? 9th century till the 14th is what u want Sommink to do with Flanders
9th century till the 14th is what u want Sommink to do with Flanders
AH YES... Forgot about that
MEDIEVAL TIMES IS WOT WE WANT
Crusades, Flandres, Robrecht de Béthune, Battle of the Golden Spurs, wanking France... MEDIEVAL TIMES
MEDIEVAL TIMES IS WOT WE WANT
Crusades, Flandres, Robrecht de Béthune, Battle of the Golden Spurs, wanking France... MEDIEVAL TIMES
I wouldn't enjoy that too much. There isn't any real compition. How many major nations were there during that time? The entire game would be don't make an empire larger then you can defend. [/QUOTE]
Exactly! I can't see any reason people keep clamouring for a roman era on this same engine.
heh, heh, heh... I just say they add another 100 years on to the total of EU2....
Originally posted by Greven
Yeeeeezzzz. That WOULD have been the logic
/Greven
Hah. Got ya.
So, when does it come out?? Early October?
Originally posted by BiB
What kinda heretic are u ?
Here's and idea: Europa Universalis 3: Flanders is not included
I would buy it.
Why? If they did that, then the game would become boring after a short while. (I don't know about you, but I play the IGC more then the regular GC.)Originally posted by Carolus Rex
And make it impossible to hack and make own scenarios.
How about a EU engine in a 20th Century game? You would probably have to make it so instead of days the system would use hours. Night attacks, special ops, Nuclear warfare... Oh yes! The game would be slightly more complicated, but even I could make the rules for it.
