The realm rejoices as Paradox Interactive announces the launch of Crusader Kings III, the latest entry in the publisher’s grand strategy role-playing game franchise. Advisors may now jockey for positions of influence and adversaries should save their schemes for another day, because on this day Crusader Kings III can be purchased on Steam, the Paradox Store, and other major online retailers.
That's not quite true. Any significant European victories in India - at least before the EIC had blobbed to a critical size - were achieved with the help of local allies.
And with Courthouses in every province this would become 5833.333 development, and if the upgraded version doubles the effect wou would be able to take 17.5k development.
For reference, how much dev is the entire world, typically?
That is only true to the significant large scale inland conquests such as the ones undertaken by the EIC in the 18th century.
I think then the issue in my opinion is that building costs in EU4 are astronomically expensive. By the time you can afford to build them in every province you own if you aren't playing tall you no longer need to build them in the first place. but I guess we can adapt if there is a workaround with courthouses.
Some have been doing this mandate of heaven, but then you miss out on the good changes to the game with the new patches.
Given the historical role of cavalry in reconnaissance and mobility, it might be very neat to have cavalry give additional control/effects on the cadence and intensity of combat and on making engagement/disengagement easier. If high cavalry could help outnumbered armies fight at a lower cadence (less combat rounds per unit time) and/or lower intensity (smaller proportions of forces in the front lines, reserve artillery unable to fire) - and do the opposite for armies with numerical advantage - they would be important throughout the game. Other aspects would be the casualties taken in "pursuit" - whether after a battle or when disengaging by evasion (which would be nice to have on its own).
The AE and Improve Relations modifier alone hurt you for attempting achievements inside the game itself. That is my problem with the proposed mechanic. It really is just another attempt to punish players who want to blob. It's a sandbox, I shouldn't have to sit there and be like "Oh well, I want to do this achievement and I need this land, but in order for me to get this land I have to jump through x rings of fire first."
This is like putting a band-aid on a broken leg. Sure, it's a very nice band-aid, and technically speaking, it's still better than no band-aid, but it does nothing whatsoever to treat the broken leg of 'Trade only flows in one direction'.
or simply add more possibility to add command to theese shits 
Just wait for Portuguese nationalists rebel pop up on a Pacific island. And if you ignore them you lose all their cores eventually.
The Teutonic order and Prussia per se are actually independent political entities. Eventhough the duchy of prussia was formed out of the teutonic order the title of the duke of prussia is tied to the region of prussia not the state of the teutonic knights.
That was not what you said in your first post. Your statement (which I replied to) was that Paradox are "effectively making the whole game play tall". The new limit will absolutely allow a non-tall playstyle without any problems. 3500 dev, which is achievable without any penalties according to what Groogy said, is not tall. And that is if you fully state everything and do not build courthouses.
STOP! COOKIE TIME
