-different formable for Portugal
No, Spain makes sense during the game's time frame
I could maybe get behind it, but it's iffy
I don't think Switzerland should be a reformable, they aren't really a major or cultural union of people
Lusatian/polabian nation (west slavic)
Lusatia is being added in 1.30, Polabians were basically gone by game start, there's no justification for bringing the people back, not to mention they never really developed a proper country
Maybe, it's pretty small though and didn't survive for too long
Not really any tags that could work as a united Northern Caucasus and the region is still very diverse in people like the Southern Caucasus region
-tag for shamanistic volga-ural-west sibian tribes (must create multiple provinces and tags first)
Not really a fan of this idea, not only would it be completely made up but also not much point, it's the Urals
-assyria (there was a suggestion thread about adding minor christian nation near Bitlis)
Kind of divided on this, on one hand, Assyria is considered a region and Assyrian people are still around to this day, but the nation of Assyria itself stopped existing while Rome was still a Kingdom, I do wish to see Nestorian added to the game but I don't know if there's enough justification to put Assyrian culture and tag in the Middle-East
-coptic/crusader variants of Egypt
Also divided here, I have yet to find any plans on the idea of a crusader state in Egypt, but more crusading options is always nice and I do like the idea of playing a crusading game and taking Egypt to liberate the Christians, but also by adding the fictional state then you enter territory of "why doesn't X area have a crusader state tag", because if you do Egypt you can easily ask why other North Africa crusader states don't exist, I would like to see more at least another crusader state tag exist, preferably all three missing ones but at least Antioch would be nice
Nubia is a rather broad geographic term, don't know if this one works
Don't know much about this area and its history, just that it's in the Ethiopia region, so I won't comment on this one
I don't know if it fits EU IV, but I wouldn't be opposed to it if we found a way
-Vij reformable OR dravidia/tamilland for South India
I'd rather see Mysore become the formable for Southern India, but Vijayanagar works,
-Ming reformable (or smth like that) if mingsplosion happened (and no manchu dynasty exist) and chineese minor managed to have provinces in both South, North China and be great power
No, Ming and Qing were not nation names like an England, Castile or Austria, but names of the dynasty, that's why Ming and Qing should have fixed family names, if Ming, and even Qing, implode then the new country that becomes Emperor of China should not want to reform Ming, and the Republic of China wasn't founded until 1912, outside of EU IV's time frame and you can't even argue that it's close like Germany and Italy
-formable for Korea, it is Emperor of China and conqured Manchuria. Maybe with the bonus adding lonely korean (k)culture to chineese group
Korea is Korea, there really isn't anything they could strive for and adding Korean to Chinese group is quite silly
-add Hawaii minors and Hawaii formable
The Hawaiian and other tribes that lived on islands in the Pacific are hard to implement, I don't really have an opinion on them being added or not as I see both sides, if they are added, then at least the Kingdom of Hawaii would be nice to see
-Belgium
-Yugoslavia
-Anglo-French tag
-west-slavic megatag
-special tag for norse scandinavia
-special tag for zoroastrian persia
I'll just throw these together to be faster
Belgium, if being added, should be very specific set of conditions and it should be a revolter tag, not formable
Yugoslavia is controversial, personally I think the pros out weight the cons but I'm not fully sold on it being in EU IV either
Anglo-French tag makes no sense, many call for the "Angevin Empire" to become a formable but it doesn't make sense for numerous reasons, the big two being that the name Angevin Empire is a modern term applied to the Kingdom of England during those certain years, it was never some announced new empire, and the other reason is that England never changed it's name while ruling half of France, it was still the Kingdom of England, remember that the Normans only conquered England about 378 years before the game start and French influence on the kingdom was very high still
West Slavic union tag is like Yugoslavia, Zapadoslavia, which is the name you're looking for, is iffy since even in our history there's not been a big push for it, so if Yugoslavia is added then sure, otherwise not really, I wouldn't be completely opposed to a Czechia tag or something else, if Bohemia collapses and loses Silesia and Lusatia, something similar to the Iceland decision, but even then I don't know if that really works
Norse paganism was dead before EU IV starts, we don't need a separate tag for a dead religion for a country that already exists
I'd rather Persia be less focused on Islam itself, and let the player choose if they want to focus on Islam or Zoroastrianism