• We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.

Wizzington

Game Director (Victoria 3)
Paradox Staff
41 Badges
Nov 15, 2007
12.576
140.842
  • Hearts of Iron II: Armageddon
  • Rome: Vae Victis
  • Victoria 2: Heart of Darkness
  • Victoria 2: A House Divided
  • Sword of the Stars II
  • Sengoku
  • Europa Universalis: Rome
  • Victoria: Revolutions
  • Europa Universalis III Complete
  • March of the Eagles
  • Majesty 2
  • Magicka
  • Heir to the Throne
  • Arsenal of Democracy
  • Crusader Kings II
  • Darkest Hour
  • Europa Universalis III Complete
  • Deus Vult
  • East India Company
  • Europa Universalis III
  • Divine Wind
  • For The Glory
  • Hearts of Iron III: Their Finest Hour
  • Hearts of Iron III Collection
  • Prison Architect
  • Shadowrun: Hong Kong
  • Shadowrun: Dragonfall
  • Shadowrun Returns
  • Stellaris: Humanoids Species Pack
  • Stellaris: Synthetic Dawn
  • Stellaris - Path to Destruction bundle
  • Stellaris: Leviathans Story Pack
  • Stellaris Sign-up
  • Stellaris: Galaxy Edition
  • Stellaris: Galaxy Edition
  • Stellaris: Galaxy Edition
  • Mount & Blade: Warband
  • Magicka: Wizard Wars Founder Wizard
  • Crusader Kings II: Holy Knight (pre-order)
  • 500k Club
  • Victoria 2
Happy new 2016, everyone! With the holidays over, we now return to our regularly scheduled Thursday dev diaries. Today we'll be talking about some changes coming in the upcoming 1.15 bugfixing and balancing patch, which should come out sometime before the end of January.


Changes to Estates
The Estates feature represented a major shift in the EU4 development towards more internal mechanics. Such shifts rarely go entirely smoothly, and there was some controversy regarding the feature, with many players either loving or hating it. We consider the Estates mechanic a strong addition to the game and intend to continue to develop internal mechanics in EU4 (though it will always remain an empire building game at its core) but, as might be expected when going in an entirely new design direction, some of the Estates mechanics didn't end up working so well in practice. For this reason, Estates will be recieving a number of tweaks in 1.15 to make them more interesting and balanced.

First of all, all Estates will now be removed from provinces on conquest. This is one of those cases where it makes absolute perfect sense historically: The local nobility didn't just up and vanish when a new ruler took over, and nearly all conquerors had to depend on the same local elites that ruled in the territory before their conquest. However, gameplay wise this simply didn't work out, with players experiencing sudden Estate influence spikes they could not control or having to revoke a badly placed Estate to give the province to another Estate. The option to have Estates remain on conquest will stay for modders that want to emphasise history over gameplay.

Secondly, Loyalty is being reworked. Originally, Loyalty was all permanent effects, with the temporary modifiers added later because of the effects of interactions and the like simply ending up too strong. This however has created a bit of a weird hybrid system where it's difficult to predict where your Estates' loyalty will be in the future, and where you can get stuck at low loyalty waiting and praying for some event to fire. As such, we're going to change Loyatly to adopt a model more like prestige, where loyalty is a permanent value with no modifiers that decays slowly towards a middle point of 50, with the decay being faster the further from 50 it is. The disloyal threshold was changed to 40, while the loyal threshold remains at 60. The non-temporary modifiers for loyalty (such as high piety for the Ulema) were changed to modifiers on the decay speed, so disloyal nobles will cease being disloyal faster if the monarch has high legitimacy, for example.

Finally, the way Estates give autonomy in provinces is also being changed. While the autonomy itself isn't a problem, the fact that we changed autonomy to be multiplicative resulted in some undesirable results like Nobility provinces actually reducing manpower if the country also had quantity. For this reason, we've tweaked the different Estates to have special exceptions to their autonomy effects, which apply not only to autonomy given from the Estate but to all autonomy in the province, as follows:
  • Provinces controlled by the Clergy and Dhimmi will no longer have the effects of autonomy applied to tax income.
  • Provinces controlled by the Burghers will no longer have the effects of autonomy applied to production income and trade power.
  • Provinces controlled by the Nobility, Cossacks and Tribes will no longer have the effects of autonomy applied to manpower and force limit.

In addition to these changes, there are also a number of minor tweaks, such as adjusting the province effects of Estates to work with the new autonomy exception and making it so that developing Estate provinces increases their loyalty.
JUmnhoq.png


Changes to Diplomatic Feedback
The second of the big two features in Cossacks, Diplomatic Feedback, suffered from some problems of its own on launch. Unlike Estates, the problem with Diplomatic Feedback was not with the feature design but rather the fact that we were a little too conservative in adapting the AI to the new system, resulting in things like one-province hordes laying claim to half of Eurasia or AI allies rivaling you at 100 trust because they had no other possible rivals to choose from. To address this, we're making the following changes:
  • The AI will no longer rival a country they have 80+ trust with under any circumstances.
  • Trust now has a much stronger effect on whether the AI desires your provinces, and will be the primary determinor when the AI has to choose between two mutually exclusive alliances (because of rivalries etc).
  • The way AI claims provinces of vital interest has been reworked to be more sensible.
  • When an alliance is about to break because of mutually vital territory, the game will now warn you via an alert that this is going to happen and give you a chance to adjust your own claims.
Elective Monarchy Rework
While certainly not a Cossacks or 1.14 feature, Poland's Elective Monarchy from Res Publica has always been the source of complaints from people who do not feel that its representation of Jagellion legitimacy is, shall we say, strictly accurate. It's one of those things that has been on my personal todo list to revamp for a long time, and for 1.15 it is going to receive the following changes:
  • Local heirs will now have a claim strength of 80, same as foreign heirs, meaning they will no longer start their reign with low legitimacy.
  • The stat boosts for local heirs were somewhat reduced, though they still get on average higher stats than foreign heirs.
  • Boosting the support of a local heir now costs prestige (10 for 5 support) instead of legitimacy.
  • When a foreign monarch holds the throne, there is now a small chance that another country of that dynasty will get a CB to enforce a union on the elective monarchy. If they successfully do so, the elective monarchy is abolished and replaced with a monarchy of the same type as their new overlord.
QNDMqPI.png


That's all for today! Next week we'll continue talking about patch 1.15, so stay tuned.
 
Last edited:
  • 228
  • 61
  • 5
Reactions:
nice! I like elective monarchy changes.

And it looks like I was totally right to wait for 1.15 before playing cossacks dlc.

Diplomatic feedback warning you about this or that is also nice change.. No more 'break Alliance and then being rivalled by same nation' without a clue.
 
  • 27
  • 1
Reactions:
Thank goodness, the estate changes look good.
 
  • 14
  • 1
Reactions:
Very cool that you're working to improve and balance existing features. Thumbs up from here!
 
  • 21
  • 1
Reactions:
why I like paradox they will flatout say this didn't work right or we didn't do this right so let us fix it in a patch.

thanks paradox!
 
  • 51
  • 3
  • 1
Reactions:
Seems great.

One question regarding autonomy and estates. Let's say I just conquered a center of trade and increased autonomy to avoid rebels so that autonomy is now 75%. Now if I give this province to the Burghers, production and trade power values will be as if autonomy was 0% and I get on top of it +50% trade power and +10% goods produced modifier (assuming loyalty of Burghers >60)? The 75% autonomy will only apply to taxes, Manpower, forcelimits, recruitment time and warscore cost?

This will greatly increase the interest of giving newly conquered provinces to your Estates, or high autonomy ones so that they become much more productive. I'd say I like this, but is this intended?
 
  • 14
  • 2
  • 1
Reactions:
Very nice ideas !
I really like the way Estate autonomy will work.

How about Pomerania and Bavaria rework ? If I remember well those countries weren`t united at the start.
The 1.15 patch can be the perfect time to rework Pomerania and Bavaria.
 
  • 1
Reactions:
Seems great.

One question regarding autonomy and estates. Let's say I just conquered a center of trade and increased autonomy to avoid rebels so that autonomy is now 75%. Now if I give this province to the Burghers, production and trade power values will be as if autonomy was 0% and I get on top of it +50% trade power and +10% goods produced modifier (assuming loyalty of Burghers >60)?

Correct. It can actually be very beneficial to give high autonomy provinces to Estates now.
 
  • 72
  • 17
  • 1
Reactions:
it Always has been beneficial to give poor and high autonomy provinces to estates... Maybe even more so now ;)
 
  • 3
  • 1
  • 1
Reactions:
I don't know, in theory the Estates feature should be good for history and gameplay. (OTOH I acknowledge that gameplay to a degree is personal, and I'll admit to value history and for me gameplay and history are linked in games such as EU IV and CK II). That doesn't mean it the feature always worked perfectly, but
The local nobility didn't just up and vanish when a new ruler took over, and nearly all conquerors had to depend on the same local elites that ruled in the territory before their conquest
is a very true statement.

So to just remove an Estate on conquest, I don't know, but other than that I'm very happy with the changes.
 
  • 12
  • 8
Reactions:
In the future, will there be any connection between Government types and estates influence? It would be incredible, as right now, you may switch from Constitutional Monarchy to Absolutism, and other government types without any problem and the oppsite. Government types feel very idle and boring. Also, Such act should destabilize the state and a estates requirement or another to each government type is needed (some mechanism also to late game to reflection of revolution is necessary).

Whatever will be, I must say the current changes are great, I love it!
 
Last edited:
  • 18
  • 1
Reactions:
Thanks! You have basically addressed my problems with the estates! Instead of just keeping them at the minimum I can get away with to avoid hassle I might really try to milk them now.
 
  • 4
Reactions:
I don't know, in theory the Estates feature should be good for history and gameplay. (OTOH I acknowledge that gameplay to a degree is personal, and I'll admit to value history and for me gameplay and history are linked in games such as EU IV and CK II). That doesn't mean it the feature always worked perfectly, but is a very true statement.

So to just remove an Estate on conquest, I don't know, but other than that I'm very happy with the changes.

Well the new system can also be justified by the fact that estate control of a province represents the predominance of one estate in a province, and conquests in most cases had the effect of changing the local balance of power. So the fact that the player can choose who to grant the estate too can represent divide and rule tactics where the conqueror favorises less influential estates in the province to negate the predominance of the old one. I mean sure the other system was maybe more historical but this one has its justifications too.

Other than that I look forward to the tweaks, I really like how loyalty is being reworked and the changes to make trust more important !
 
  • 9
  • 3
  • 2
Reactions:
Will the saves of version 1.14.4 stay valid? Just because I am writing an AAR, and I wouldn' like to restart the entire game, but I would like to enjoy the new features.
 
In the future, will there be any connection between Government types and estates influence? It would be incredible, as right now, you may switch from Constitutional Monarchy to Absolutism, and other government types without any problem and the oppsite. Government ypes feel very idle and boring. Also, Such act should destabilize the state and a estates requirement or another to each government type is needed (some mechanism also to late game to reflection of revolution is necessary).

Whatever will be, I must say the current changes are great, I love it!
There is already connection between Government types and estates influence:
  • Nobility want more provinces in Monarchies and Noble Republics, and has more influence on non-feudal Monarchies
  • Burghers want more provinces in Republics and have more Influence on Free Cities
  • Clergy has more influence on the Papal States and Theocracies
 
  • 2
  • 1
Reactions:
There is already connection between Government types and estates influence:
  • Nobility want more provinces in Monarchies and Noble Republics, and has more influence on non-feudal Monarchies
  • Burghers want more provinces in Republics and have more Influence on Free Cities
  • Clergy has more influence on the Papal States and Theocracies

I think he meant something like reduced influence for estates (at a cost of course) for an absolute monarchy, or special events regarding the estates for certain types of government espcially the late game ones like constitutional monarchy, enlightened despotism and the revolutionary ones (not sure about these last ones though, i don't think they have estates) since these represent an evolution in internal politics and had some profound consequences on local governement.

Of course it is better to first tweak the core system before integrating the mechanic with other parts of the game.
 
  • 10
  • 2
Reactions: