EU4 - Dev Diary - January 7th 2016
- Thread starter Wizzington
- Start date
-
We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
Will there be any changes to the shinto faith in the future? Since it's one of the more "boring" religions with no interactions what so ever.
@Wiz
@Wiz
- 4
All of East Asia needs to be a bit revamped tbh. The Philippines, Shinto, Confucianism, many areas are underdeveloped content-wise. There is also the question of a Ming Tributary system and some other flavour.
- 4
Maybe the players should get a choice on whether to keep the local estate upon conquest, therefore maintaining a historical sence while also fit gameplay requirement.
- 7
- 1
Then there should be a malus for uprooting the local estates; that wouldn't just be something you did easily.
- 4
- 1
Shinto should by syncretistic like Tengri, except starting with a few Buddhist provinces in Japan, and starting as syncretistic with a Buddhist faith.
Maybe add promoting specific Kami as selectable household cults.
Similar to the Hindu system, but more options like the Protestant selection, with maybe having one be the 'Imperial Cult'.
Maybe have recently conquered estates remain, but with a modifier that gives a free revocation.
That one province might rebel, but it won't effect the national estates?
@Wiz !!!
- 2
- 1
I'm going to miss the challenge of dealing with the previous nation's estates. It felt so right.
- 5
- 3
.png){kind=avatar}
There is historical precedence of the conquerer ousting the previous nation's estates. Just look at the norman invasion of England. I'm not saying this was the norm, but considering it is a more fun game-mechanic I'm clearly favoring conquest removing estates...
- 1
- 1
Maybe you should be given the choice to keep the estates as is in return for less unrest?
- 7
I would like that choice. But at least it won't be completely out of choice by allowing modders to reenable this again, so better than nothing.
.png){kind=avatar}
I wouldn't mind keeping the estates if the AI was sensible in placing them. Too often I see a 6-6-2 dev province given to nobility. Or maybe they are actually being smart due to how autonomy is calculated?
In my opinion, if you kick out the nobility of the previous country, it shouldn't too much upset your own nobles, but it should give extra unrest in the province due to all the unseated nobles now being all unhappy.
In my opinion, if you kick out the nobility of the previous country, it shouldn't too much upset your own nobles, but it should give extra unrest in the province due to all the unseated nobles now being all unhappy.
Thank you for improving estates and trust especially. I love being able to communicate to the Ai about my intentions and understand what concessions they want me to make for an alliance.
I guess it's early yet, but I was really hoping to read something about the fort system. IMO it was playable in 1.13 but completely broke in 1.14 with some very strange design choices leading to surprising behaviour and outright bugs, all of which cause frustration and loss of fun.
That said, I like the changes to estates. I haven't played as much as some (partly due to the frustration with forts!), but I can say these changes should address the instances where I've found them unfun.
That said, I like the changes to estates. I haven't played as much as some (partly due to the frustration with forts!), but I can say these changes should address the instances where I've found them unfun.
Yeah, I want to see this revocation being optional (until separatism is gone), and if used increases unrest in the province without effecting your own Estate's loyalty.
Eh no. In 1520 Christian II of Denmark decides to pretty much oust the nobles of Sweden by cutting off their heads in the Stockholmian Bloodbath. When he returns to Denmark all the Danish nobles have revolted due to not being sure if he also want to take away their rights (he just did take away the rights of several powerful Swedish nobles after all) and in the end they manage to depose him.
So perhaps uprooting the local nobles should have a considerable risk of your nobles revolting in a very, very serious revolt. (And I do mean serious; it shouldn't be anything trivial to handle at all.)
- 2
Revoking their autonomy is not the same thing as mass executions.
- 1
- 1