EU3 *Unofficial* FAQ Thread

[unmerged(2456)]

Updated again. Johan made a clarification post while I was doing my last update.

Also i know there are more buildings confirmed (and maybe units), but i don't know where the screenshots are, with names.

 

[unmerged(2456)]

Updated new content + moved some stuff around for better conistancy.

 

[Gaute65]

You have forgotten one building: War_college

 

[unmerged(2456)]

You have forgotten one building: War_college

Thanks. As i said, I'm not sure what buildings were mentioned in the screenshot releases.

UPDATED.

 

[Gaute65]

I cant see that you have added this from the last diary:

The artists have been busy adding in colonial animations, while also developing the twodecker warships

 

[unmerged(2456)]

UPDATED. I put it under 2nd category as 3-decker is in the first, so unless someone finds anything to contraditc that...

 

[unmerged(2456)]

Updated for 21.6.2006 post.

 

[unmerged(26464)]

Good work! Though FAQ always annoy me becasue they only ever ask questions that have readilly known answers. I've never seen a FAQ answer questions like: 'What is it all about, really, when you get down to it?" or "Why does eating too much wasabi make my nose feel like it's going to explode?"

On another track, here's some nitpicking:

Q: "How many provinces will there be"

I think >1700 would be more accurate than ~1700, as ~ indicates around 1700 i.e. above or below 1700 but only by a bit, whereas we know there will more than 1700 so a > would be more suitable

 

[unmerged(2456)]

'What is it all about, really, when you get down to it?"

Life.

What is the meaning of life you ask? 42.

As far as i know they are still working on the question to the answer of the meaning of life though.

"Why does eating too much wasabi make my nose feel like it's going to explode?"

That may be a question science cannot explain.

On another track, here's some nitpicking:

Q: "How many provinces will there be"

I think >1700 would be more accurate than ~1700, as ~ indicates around 1700 i.e. above or below 1700 but only by a bit, whereas we know there will more than 1700 so a > would be more suitable

ok i'll update this.

 

[unmerged(2456)]

Updated again with comments by Johan.

 

[unmerged(26464)]

ok i'll update this.

It's nice to know I've made a difference to the world.

 

[unmerged(2456)]

Updated for the 28th of June dev diary, last diary of june.

 

[peregrino05]

excuse me but...what about Napoleon and French revolution?

 

[unmerged(11427)]

excuse me but...what about Napoleon and French revolution?

Since the game ends in 1789, French revolution will not be in the game.

 

[peregrino05]

sigh, RIP Napoleon´s scenario

 

[unmerged(11427)]

Don't worry. I'm sure that within a few months there will be a "no-time-limit" patch and gifted modders will make a French Revolution scenario.

 

[Captain Frakas]

Since the game ends in 1789, French revolution will not be in the game.

I'm I correct if I say that we don't know if it end in 1789, just that it end between 1776 and 1799, or are the timeframe revelated ?

The only thing I have read about it is the gamespot interview :

The game starts in 1453, right after Constantinople has fallen to the Turks, and continues up until the revolutions in France and America.

 

[unmerged(11427)]

You might be correct. In Jinnai's unoffical FAQ (first post of this thread) it is firmly stated that the gema ends in 1789, but the official one states:

The game will begin in 1453, after the fall of the Byzantine Empire to the Ottomans. The end date has not been officially announced, although Johan indicated (in the Gamespot interview) that it would be in roughly "the time of the revolutions in France and America".

EDIT:
Funny, I just found your post in shorter time frame!? thread.

1453-1789 is good...

If it was me, the game time frame will only be 1453-1650.

 

[Captain Frakas]

Damned ! I'm revelated !

 

[unmerged(2456)]

You might be correct. In Jinnai's unoffical FAQ (first post of this thread) it is firmly stated that the gema ends in 1789, but the official one states:


EDIT:
Funny, I just found your post in shorter time frame!? thread.

There was on post in a review that mentioned 1786 and another 1789. 1789 has been the more widely circulated number. No dates after 1789 have been mentioned.