I love this game, there are some things I still don't quite understand.
I am dominating the game in conquest and diplomacy, but continue to do
very poorly at inflation and trade.
1. Inflation. How do you minimize it, except for promoting mayors to
governors? Is it lower if you spend more money on development and tech
than cash? Is it lower if you accrue money, but don't spend it?
Playing as Austria, my inflation is consistently the highest of anyone
except for the Ottoman Empire and Greece. Not sure why. I've tried to
minimize it but I can't get it under control. I've only taken out a
single loan in the entire game which I immediately payed back.
2. Attrition. About 80% of my army is consistently lost to attrition.
I keep them parked in my own cities, except while I am invading.
Is it better to have multiple small armies for attrition purposes than
large ones (i.e. is attrition lower for 3 armies with 5,000 men, than
for 1 army with 15,000 men)? I am trying to keep my armies relatively
small but am still losing many people.
3. Trading. Is it even worthwhile at the beginning of the grand
campaign? I find myself losing more money than I earn. The costs of
placing single traders, typically 5-20 ducats, absolutely dwarf the
monthly incomes of 0.1-1.5 ducats I am getting from trading. Any trade
secrets or tips to improve this?
4. Tech advancements. I like to put my tech slider on essentially 0%
tech (allowing the monarch bonus + neighbor bonuses to foster
development) and spend my ducats on building & maintaining armies to
invade neighbors. Is this causing inflation problems for me? The
costs of advancement are too astronomical for me to devote a large
portion of my income to infrastructure, trade, etc. which produce
advances only after 10-20 years in many cases. When I invest in tech
at all, it is usually in land military. What do you do and why?
Kudos to Strategy First for a phenomenal game with great realism and historic/educational value!
Thanks!
Falconhurst
I am dominating the game in conquest and diplomacy, but continue to do
very poorly at inflation and trade.
1. Inflation. How do you minimize it, except for promoting mayors to
governors? Is it lower if you spend more money on development and tech
than cash? Is it lower if you accrue money, but don't spend it?
Playing as Austria, my inflation is consistently the highest of anyone
except for the Ottoman Empire and Greece. Not sure why. I've tried to
minimize it but I can't get it under control. I've only taken out a
single loan in the entire game which I immediately payed back.
2. Attrition. About 80% of my army is consistently lost to attrition.
I keep them parked in my own cities, except while I am invading.
Is it better to have multiple small armies for attrition purposes than
large ones (i.e. is attrition lower for 3 armies with 5,000 men, than
for 1 army with 15,000 men)? I am trying to keep my armies relatively
small but am still losing many people.
3. Trading. Is it even worthwhile at the beginning of the grand
campaign? I find myself losing more money than I earn. The costs of
placing single traders, typically 5-20 ducats, absolutely dwarf the
monthly incomes of 0.1-1.5 ducats I am getting from trading. Any trade
secrets or tips to improve this?
4. Tech advancements. I like to put my tech slider on essentially 0%
tech (allowing the monarch bonus + neighbor bonuses to foster
development) and spend my ducats on building & maintaining armies to
invade neighbors. Is this causing inflation problems for me? The
costs of advancement are too astronomical for me to devote a large
portion of my income to infrastructure, trade, etc. which produce
advances only after 10-20 years in many cases. When I invest in tech
at all, it is usually in land military. What do you do and why?
Kudos to Strategy First for a phenomenal game with great realism and historic/educational value!
Thanks!
Falconhurst