Maybe your right, but the current system isnt good.Originally posted by Mormegil
It'll put as way way back. We've argued about this for a long time...I don't think we should use more time on it.
-
We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
None of the systems are right. There will always be some there to complain.
Don't worry, I take the hit anyway.
Well if you can tell me what goverment Belarus and all other pin-pot dictators have, then Im satisfied.
I dunno what Belarus has. But why take away, i.e C. Monarchy, to get the belarus one, what should all c. monarchy coutries be then? Not "P. Democracy" or something, it's not the same. There's no such thing like that over here...
Well you could easily make all C. monarchy to Parliament democracies and add all Republics where the president has no power here (like Finland and Germany). My proposal for change is to slightly adjust the names to show ¨who is in power instead what type of goverment it is.
Small changes:
Hinduism - from Absolut monarchy to Monarchy (how could any king be not be absolut if he have signifigant power?)
Orthodox - from C. monarchy to Self serving dictatorship. Not a good name, but this would be a goverment type for where one man rules it all.
Small changes:
Hinduism - from Absolut monarchy to Monarchy (how could any king be not be absolut if he have signifigant power?)
Orthodox - from C. monarchy to Self serving dictatorship. Not a good name, but this would be a goverment type for where one man rules it all.
Why do have to take away C. Monarchy? And isn't there already something called Dictatorship? Or maybe It was Facism, but it should be dictatorship...
And isn't there already something called Dictatorship? Or maybe It was Facism, but it should be dictatorship...
Well change Fascism to dictatorship then.
Maybe Orthodox could be party dictatorship (like China)
Maybe Orthodox could be party dictatorship (like China)
I've said it before and I'll say it again, I'm against C.Monarchy been in. The governments of the France and Britain for instance are very alike next to governments of other countries in the world. There is nothing to stopping one becoming like the other given time and all.
I am in favour of 2 kinds of democracy now after some thought- Normal and federal
Edit: Or maybe I'm not, isn't the federal thing the centralization slider?
I am in favour of 2 kinds of democracy now after some thought- Normal and federal
Edit: Or maybe I'm not, isn't the federal thing the centralization slider?
I actually think that democracies should all be one type of government, or maybe like Western Democracy / Islamic Democracy or something... because there's no reason IMO for the relations malus and the need for conversions between Federal Democracy and Parlimentary Democracy, especially at the cost of thousands of ducats.
IMO
Catholic/Prodestant/Reformed
Islamic Democracy/???/Western Democracy
Cause Islamic Democracies end up being different than Western Democracies (esp. in Church and State.), but I dunno what the middle one would be.
IMO
Catholic/Prodestant/Reformed
Islamic Democracy/???/Western Democracy
Cause Islamic Democracies end up being different than Western Democracies (esp. in Church and State.), but I dunno what the middle one would be.
ya, thats the problem.
I remember we had a sort-of meeting and we got like nothing done.
I remember we had a sort-of meeting and we got like nothing done.
Nah It could never be too many spots. We can always fill them up with them with future goverment like a country runed by companies.
Yep
That's why it's best doing the discussing here
At the meeting some of you guys gave us... links you guys wouldn't post here
(seriously, don't do it either)Anyway, I could agree with Western Democrazy... But what would all the others be?
Dictatorship
Islamic D.
Socialism
Communism (we've got enough of free religions, so we've got room for both
)Also, i don't think Western D. should be reformed and Islamic D. be Catholic... Suddenly USA turns into a Islamic D....
Why cant I never be at this meetingsOriginally posted by Mormegil
That's why it's best doing the discussing here
At the meeting some of you guys gave us... links you guys wouldn't post here
Anyway, I could agree with Western Democrazy... But what would all the others be?
Dictatorship
Islamic D.
Socialism
Communism (we've got enough of free religions, so we've got room for both
Also, i don't think Western D. should be reformed and Islamic D. be Catholic... Suddenly USA turns into a Islamic D....
I think we should make all different Christian religons Democracies. There are no other way as it wouldnt make sense to make a country non democratic just like that.
And can you please tell me what you mean with socialism as a goverment type?
The AI will not do this, so I see no problem, with the exception that it will be no revolts as It should be.
Can't be too sure of that... I've seen a Poland having 2 protestant provinces and 5 (!) Catholic ones, still turning protestant. It's not usual, but it's still there.
Also, Socialism? Well, say, have Socialism Protestant, Communism Reformed, and Catholic... western democracy? Or is this too mad?
As to the meeting, it was just a random one, some of us noticed that almost all of us was online
Also, Socialism? Well, say, have Socialism Protestant, Communism Reformed, and Catholic... western democracy? Or is this too mad?
As to the meeting, it was just a random one, some of us noticed that almost all of us was online