emperor and crown prince leaders of suppressed factions WAD or Bug?

[nfmarque]

Greetings,
I was playing a fanatic authoritarian, militarist and was suppressing xenophobe and spiritualist factions however the emperor was the leader of the xenophobe and the prince was the leader of the spiritualist. Is this wad or a bug? makes no sense those bozos where negating the suppression...

I tried to solve this by changing government to dictatorship but the authoritarian faction want an emperor and besides of only have 1 red condition it started to gave no influence, is this also WAD or Bug??

thanks.

 

[Alblaka]

Is this wad or a bug?

I would class this as 'Design oversight'. Aka, not a bug, because the system is working as it was originally designed, just that somebody didn't think through the design choices ahead of time.

I tried to solve this by changing government to dictatorship but the authoritarian faction want an emperor and besides of only have 1 red condition it started to gave no influence, is this also WAD or Bug??

Entirely WAD, you get influence if the happyness is at or above 60%. If that 'one red' drops you below that limit, you gain no influence.

 

[RossMorris]

Sounds like a case of a missing if then statement. If I'm actively seeking to suppress Faction A then the program should know not to place a ruler or heir at the head of it.

Did they become the ruler become the head of the faction before or after you started suppressing?

 

[nfmarque]

Sounds like a case of a missing if then statement. If I'm actively seeking to suppress Faction A then the program should know not to place a ruler or heir at the head of it.

Did they become the ruler become the head of the faction before or after you started suppressing?

After.

 

[Druesling]

I had my crown prince of my Xenophobe Empire be the head of the "Xeno Justice Commity".
I thought that told quite a neat little story.


"But moooom! Xenos are people too, kinda!"