You are correct that they can coexist basically because they are from the same branch, but Ch'an/Zen Budhism is heavily weighed in with Confuscian ideals which is why it appealed to the Japanese warrior class. The only other major Budhist sect at this time was Pure Land Budhism which is IMO further away from the ideals of Confuscianism/Budhism mix.Originally posted by Sun_Zi_36
The different branches of Buddhism is divided along the lines of their beliefs/practices and is not divded along the lines of whether there is Confucian influence. Therefore using the names of the branches would be misleading and underestimate the importance of Confucianism.
By the way, Mahayana Buddhism is a popular branch in East Asia so it is quite obvious that it can coexist in Confucian dominated areas. In fact Zen follows many of the Mahayana believes and practices.
Originally posted by Aetius
I was very much against the idea of using Confucianism from the start as a word to describe the religious practices of China, Vietnam, Korea and Japan. I can't remember my counter proposal though. AFAIK the intent of Paradox is that Buddhism is the kind that exists in Thailand, Sri Lanka and Tibet. I don't think that the Thai and Lankese theological traditions follow the same as the Tibetan tradition, so any division using Buddhist theology is going to cause problems...
Is that what they said? it doesn't make sense. The kind that exists there, even in that time was a minority. It would be like basing chrisitianity off the sect that exists within egypt which split long before catholic/orthodox.