The idea, Monsieur, would be to ensure that both languages are known anyway. That way we can just focus on securing the best man for the job. Though – and please correct me if I am wrong – it would stand to reason that the best administrators would be those in national, rather than provincial, positions, and would therefore need to have knowledge of both tongues.
Perhaps if I amended the bill to discount provincial employees?
~Jean-François, Vicomte du Sint-Niklaas, MWO
((Considering it's been two years, I wouldn't have thought so. I'm not really sure what we are.))
Yes, ideally both languages would be known, but sometimes that will not be the case. I simply don't feel that requiring both languages is necessary when we have many people who do know both and could serve as competent translators when needed. And yes, we would try to get the best administrators in the national government, but some may prefer serving at a provincial level. I agree that both languages should ideally be known, but I feel it should not be a requirement for the job, especially when translators are available. Perhaps someone could be elected without knowledge of both languages, but a translator would be provided when necessary, and they could be required to take lessons in the language they do not know. This would ensure that the best choice is picked for the job, not the best choice who can speak both languages.
Michel Daret
Last edited: