((I'm going to assume for the narrative that, since he was around to hear Vandermeer's petition, Contravarius left before his indictment arrived. But I like to think that he just suddenly clambered out the window.))
Roni Vandermeer was nothing if not fastidious. It was a tendency she had harboured all her life, and it had only heightened in politics, where ignorance was not bliss, but death. She was not about to appear before the Council of Commissars and improvise; every detail had been planned. She had expected trouble from Contravarius, who she considered to be far too covetous of power, suspiciously unorthodox in ideology, and, above all, of appalling taste. But her expectations had foundered; Contravarius appeared favourable to the proposal. The trouble was not his opposition, as she had feared, but his compliance. Just as she was taken for one turn, she was suddenly spun by another. For as much as she personally loathed Contravarius and considered him dangerous, she had no inkling of the plot he had hatched. And now her erstwhile enemy was on the run, vanished. Vandermeer smiled; all roads lead to Rome. Nonetheless, there was work to be done. As the tragedy unfolded before her, she quietly opened up her briefcase - only a crack - and removed a manilla portfolio. And so she waited, as the waves of recrimination lapped around her, quiet and contemplative, thumbing through the pages of the portfolio, absorbing every detail. Then, once an opening had presented itself, she stood up. Contravarius was dead, but he was still to be buried.
"Brothers, I share your grief at the report that has been delivered to us regarding the duplicity of Konrad Contravarius. I commend both Commissar de Lannoy for his fidelity and Commissar van Buskirk for his vigilance. I cannot, however, say that I am surprised. I must ask: who is Konrad Contravarius? He was an aristocrat, of course, though I confess his origins were totally impenetrable to myself. He was a brother Fascist; he had been so since shortly after the Great War, which makes him almost an elder statesman of this young movement. He was an entrusted friend of the Leader, who promised him power even before it was within our grasp, raised him to the Propaganda Commissariat - perhaps the most important institution for the success of the cause - and, in all things, considered him an asset and an ally. And so, regardless of suspicion or concern, he was beyond scrutiny and reproach.
That is the myth - but who is the man? Who is Konrad Contravarius? Do we believe that the duality of man can be so great that he could be all these things, but also a traitor? Can treason spring from patriotism? No more, I think, than water can spring from a barren well. Treason is its own source; it is harboured, nurtured and blossomed. It does not simply seize a man without precedent. And this act of treason is great indeed, and all the more brazen for having been stowed away in the heart of the movement.
So who truly is Konrad Contravarius? If we are to judge a man by his actions, let us account for them. At the outset, he distinguished himself by a willingness to indulge that most degenerate strand of democracy, Bolshevism, and to bolster the polity that spawned it, Russia. He adamantly oppose a military intervention to liberate Russia from the Bolshevist hordes, instead demanding "closer relations with our revolutionary brothers in the East, so that we can once forge a united front". He condemned "thoughtless and inexcusable statements against our revolutionary brothers in Russia", as Fascism and Bolshevism "were together in this struggle", divided only by "small details". Can you imagine this, brothers? Our movement, destined by history to rule the world and eradicate every edifice of the sclerotic order that preceded it, no different from the band of brigands that would extinguish the flame of Fascism and plunge all mankind into darkness?
But I intend to demonstrate that vocal deviation and heresy is the least of the matter. Actions, of course, attest louder than words. In the calm before the storm of the struggle, Contravarius spent his time patronising various arthouses and societies; we will recall the so-called 'Société des amis de la Révolution Nationale et le Totalitarisme', and its successor, the 'International National Revolutionary Arts and Literature Foundation'. Though some may consider art an extravagant distraction, I maintain that it is a portal into men's souls, and that the 'totalitarian' art purveyed by these societies, with their debased, brutal aesthetics and obsessively proletarian subject-matter, were very far from Fascism indeed. The Foundation, which was openly pan-national, was soon to become a contemptible pit of unscrupulous characters, many who barely merited to be called 'Rightist', and who lauded the achievements of - none other than - Bolshevist Russia. We shall hear from the Foundation again.
For here we reach the crux of the matter: the years of struggle. Truly these were the years that partitioned the sheep from the wolves, and the wheat from the chaff. And here, to adopt the mannerisms of the sordid tale that this is, we are introduced to a new character: Valentin Íñigo dom Contravarius, relative to his namesake, a Spaniard born in St. Petersburg. I did not know of his presence in Belgium at the time, which I must infer, nor of his activities throughout the struggle. But we are informed that Contravarius himself performed bravely throughout the battle for Belgium. But did he fight for the fatherland and for Fascism? As I ordered the denudation of Belgium in case of our defeat, I discovered that in many ways, I had been pre-empted; various cultural artefacts had already been seized by Contravarius. But they were not bound for Africa. It was, indeed, not until two years later that I discovered that the International Foundation had resettled in Spain, that Socialist stronghold in Europe, with Valentin Íñigo as its chairman, and no doubt many Belgian treasures and minds in its midst. His heroism in Belgium had in fact been a cover for blatant theft and exploitation. Spain was the beneficiary of his actions, not Belgium.
And so I ask again: who is Konrad Contravarius? I think the answer is now clear, but let me establish it so as to remove all doubt. Konrad Contravarius was an unrepentant Bolshevist, and his presence in this movement can only be construed as infiltration and sabotage. His policy all along has been to foster insidious thoughts of collaboration with the Marxists, whose own policy, as we all know, is to exploit their allies as a stepping-stone to power and then destroy them. He consistently advanced an agenda of Fascist-Bolshevist confederacy that would have ended with the annihilation of this movement and Marxist supremacy. He is not merely a traitor, a liar and a heretic - he could not possibly betray a movement that he was never loyal to in the first place! He was an international agent of Bolshevism, undoubtedly on the payroll of Moscow and Madrid, working at their instigation to subvert the fledgling Fascist project. This so-called Fascist, this so-called comrade, was nothing more than a sheep in wolf's clothing, a pathetic pantomime of Fascism masterminded by the international Bolshevist front! He was the Marxist missionary, an envoy of oblivion, an ambassador of unrighteous, unpatriotic ideology!
And so I say, death to spies! Death to conspirators and deceivers! The purity of our movement is worth the pain of their excision. But we cannot stop with 'comrade' Contravarius; the disease runs deeper. It is clear that the disorganisation of this movement is more serious than even my assessment had claimed. That such a charlatan could ever rise to this esteemed council is necessity enough for its dissolution. If we are to recover this movement from other such saboteurs, and deflect the death blows they wish to inflict on the Fascist project, then the Great Council of Fascism must claim the mantle of leadership."