1) Least important thing: There are no unit leader portraits to distinguish one commander from the other. None whatsoever, not even Badoglio, Di Bono or italo Balbo nor the naval commanders. This, as you might expect, can be confusing in the middle of a Med-wide campaign vs the full might of the Royal Navy.
2) No longer do the Bersaglieri grace the sands of Northern Africa (sad face). I not only contend this should not be the case in the flavour or unhistoric sense, but that producing the Bersaglieri should be made by decision, preferably replacing the "Italian Army Reorganization" decision. Three options should be given, only the standard 70% strength + 19 divisions not adding dissent. These binary formations should also cost 0.5 less IC and 30-50 days less to train, but be under *severe* disadvange when facing an armored foe. It showed. Repeatedly.
The other two should be to a)produce a fast, highly trained (high org.), higly motivated (very high morale) but lightly supported (only light tanks, armored cars, AT guns or engineer brig. attachments allowed) elite and professional infantry corps, armed mostly with upgraded 10-bullet magazine Carcanos in standard 7.92 Mauser and Beretta 38A submachineguns (greater soft attack values, lower hard attack unless with AT or AA, and even then, one lower hard attack than reg inf.). These would obviously cost more IC and time to train (like mountain troops kinda time) This should produce a moderate but still painful (9-11% perhaps?) amount of dissent as the privileged, politically connected and incompetent officers complain and whine. The other should be to b)concentrate on catching up technologically with Germany and the Allies, somewhat, in tank development, which would mean putting extreme amounts of money that Rome did not have (something like 4K-6K money, 5000 rare materials and 20000 metal stockpile in-game) into further modernizing her industry, all to produce what basically constituted glorified, but good, infantry support weapons (lower hard attack, greater soft attack, lower morale, somewhat higher vulnerability). Should carry 15-20% dissent, at the least (no one likes huge tax increases and deficit spending). Italy, by the early '30's, began / tried, but not completed, it's own rearmament program but Mussolini's ambition and the realities of the cost and the lack of resources to modernize effectively, condemned Italy and the Commando Supremo to play second fiddle. The player should either bear the cost or go right along, whistling past the graveyard, but the option/chance should be given.
3) Weapon flavour events such as those that Germany & Japan get should be given to Italy, the previously mentioned Beretta 38 submachinegun should make an appearance, but primarily concerning aircraft like the excellent Savoia-Marchetti SM.79 Sparviero, which set 26 world records for speed in the mid 30's and, of course, the best fighter of the Regia Aeronautica during WWII, the Macchi C.205, claimed in one encounter with Spitfires(!) to have shot down 17 to the loss of only 3 aircraft in return. This should be Italy's only clearcut and most prominent advantage. She should have a well established & developed aircraft industry with cheaper aircraft (0.8-1 IC cheaper) but the same time to produce. Otherwise, the overdesigned and dust-sensitive heavy weapons (specially machine guns like the Breda 30 LMG (ugh)) that Italy cranked out.