Basicly I start off producing ~50 spies and send them to SOV, ENG and FRA to raise threat.
Meanwhile I spend minimal LS to research (only IC production techs). After I got the spies, I start a full industry techup + my prefered ship unit (BB/CVL or SS) + all other basic techs like radio, radar and LARM/ARM techs (for (L)ARM & MECH).
All doctrin research is halted until early 38. Then I start researching all prerequirements for the higher tier techs (I usually get all but the GAR/PTS/MIL - combat width). In addition, I start researching the most important naval / air techs. At mid/late 38 the remaining land doctrines follow.
Early production is either some AA for ART practice or some forts for industrial practice. If I plan an SS strategy I also add a run of 6 Tier II SS. If I play big I usually commisson BB/CVLs around mid/end of 37. Another option are some early INT planes, esp. useful if you want to use CV/CVL.
For unit construction I usually stack my IC until mid 38 and then start producing some ART to create INF-INF-ART divisions. Around early 39 I produce some MECH and TD and reorganize my starting LARM corps into 3x LARM-LARM-MECH and 3x MOT-TD.
For flavor I sometimes add 1 transport + 9 PAR brigades and/or 4-8 MAR brigades as special OPS. Transport can be started in 36 and use any excess IC you don't want to allocate elsewhere.
And about your questions:
Yet I still go for IC whoring, too...
Meanwhile I spend minimal LS to research (only IC production techs). After I got the spies, I start a full industry techup + my prefered ship unit (BB/CVL or SS) + all other basic techs like radio, radar and LARM/ARM techs (for (L)ARM & MECH).
All doctrin research is halted until early 38. Then I start researching all prerequirements for the higher tier techs (I usually get all but the GAR/PTS/MIL - combat width). In addition, I start researching the most important naval / air techs. At mid/late 38 the remaining land doctrines follow.
Early production is either some AA for ART practice or some forts for industrial practice. If I plan an SS strategy I also add a run of 6 Tier II SS. If I play big I usually commisson BB/CVLs around mid/end of 37. Another option are some early INT planes, esp. useful if you want to use CV/CVL.
For unit construction I usually stack my IC until mid 38 and then start producing some ART to create INF-INF-ART divisions. Around early 39 I produce some MECH and TD and reorganize my starting LARM corps into 3x LARM-LARM-MECH and 3x MOT-TD.
For flavor I sometimes add 1 transport + 9 PAR brigades and/or 4-8 MAR brigades as special OPS. Transport can be started in 36 and use any excess IC you don't want to allocate elsewhere.
And about your questions:
12-14 points is imo a too small investment. Don't build officers until you have "service on requirement" law. You can still play at 60% officer ratio, I have yet to discover noticeable negative side effects. I suggest investing ALL leadership in tech and switch to full DIP/INT for some days if you need influence or spies.1. Does 12-14 leadership points going into technology constitute too much of a drain on my leadership pool? I am at 80% officers now, but I have been steadily raising officer allocations since annexing Austria. I am confident I can get it back up to 100% by early 1939.
Imo: Yes. Though IC whoring seems not to be perfect for GER at all times. If you plan a heavy SS/BB/ARM or air setup, practice *might* become more handy then building additonal IC...2. Was it wise to put such a heavy industrial tech focus in the early part of the game? I just copied my HOI2 strategy of industry first.
Yet I still go for IC whoring, too...
The AI is extremly underwhelming atm. I usually guard the whole western front with single INF-INF-ART divisions and usually overun the most eastern maginot line province on the first day. Same for Poland: 1 INF-INF-ART at decent tech level is good enough. You don't have to fight anyway: Just rush with ARM towards their VP provinces or drop some gamey PAR on their heads...3. Will 30 divisions arranged in 3-per-province stacks be sufficient to hold off the French while another 30 infantry + armored divisions take Poland? I think it should be. I have also assigned all my airpower into a Corps on the Western Front for defense.
I tend to annex austria quite late. However, with enough threat and no interest in allies I think you should do it asap. Will try a fast annex on my next GER game. In fact, the additonal IC and ressources are quite handy...4. Was it wise to go for an early annexation of Austria or does the neutrality loss for the Allies constitute too much of a loss for me?
Can do, but the Italians are extremly powerful atm and will usually finish off France all alone. Inviting them will speed up the surrender progress since you don't have to worry about the southern VP provinces. Hower, if you have PAR you won't need them.5. I intend on starting the war alone, then inviting the alliance after I take Paris. Good idea?
Last edited: