-
We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
Zauberfloete said:
If you are meaning Sam Peckinpah's Cross of Iron, certainly not! Germans are completely losing in that... And about Tali-Ihantala film, I have to see it immediately
Zauberfloete-I wouldn't call 1943 a year when Germany had achieved some major victories lol. And the movie ends with the old guy laughing out of no reason (Like he has gone mad), while his traitorous Prussian comrade is under heavy fire by a soviet kid.
Miihkali-Me 2.
Kretoxian-I have read the book and seen the film. But even if it features a world where Germans actually won WW2, I would not exactly call a good ending for them. In the book, there is a 50% chance that the documents didn't reach the USA president, in the film it is actually written on the end that the third Reich has fallen apart. Damn this German traitor of the light, he shall burn to the ground. Atleast he dies on the end.
The only film I know about is Hitler rise of evil. It features how Hitler risen to power (My favorite film in which the "baddies" actually win lol).
Miihkali-Me 2.
Kretoxian-I have read the book and seen the film. But even if it features a world where Germans actually won WW2, I would not exactly call a good ending for them. In the book, there is a 50% chance that the documents didn't reach the USA president, in the film it is actually written on the end that the third Reich has fallen apart. Damn this German traitor of the light, he shall burn to the ground. Atleast he dies on the end.
The only film I know about is Hitler rise of evil. It features how Hitler risen to power (My favorite film in which the "baddies" actually win lol).
Delex said:
Well I think his hysterical and having hallusinations. Film's end is bit strange but same time very impressive.
yes, but in "rise of evil" as in any film, hitler's flaws are heavily exagerated, der untergang is better, more dramatic... if one would make a film where ger wins he will be exiled... there is ONE film where the Japs kinda win, the one with ben aflek at pearl harbour...
in any case, there is an AAR "NSDAP 1939-1991" somth like this http://forum.paradoxplaza.com/forum/showthread.php?t=263106,
there there, the section of films....
quite interesting,also you could get inspiration for the fatherland path in E3 mod
in any case, there is an AAR "NSDAP 1939-1991" somth like this http://forum.paradoxplaza.com/forum/showthread.php?t=263106,
there there, the section of films....
quite interesting,also you could get inspiration for the fatherland path in E3 mod
Well I don't mean something were thy completely win the war, but like a single battle or something similar.
this is the close they got
japs distroyed a lot of the US fleet vs US who bombed a factory
A nice film would be about the chaos of France in 1940, and would end with an encouraging speach of DeGaule
japs distroyed a lot of the US fleet vs US who bombed a factory
A nice film would be about the chaos of France in 1940, and would end with an encouraging speach of DeGaule
Well I know there was a love film, which ends just when the Germans storm trough France. Then the main male figure fights to blow up a bridge to hinder their advance (His death is not seen but it is mostly possible). Well all futile as it seemed since the Germans have reappeared soon after, when the main pregnant female figure started to labor and the German doctor helped her (Are the germans the good guys or what lol).ROMANU said:this is the close they got
japs distroyed a lot of the US fleet vs US who bombed a factory
A nice film would be about the chaos of France in 1940, and would end with an encouraging speech of DeGaule
Ok, If we agree to use mumia's flag for Yugo Greek para-country, what will the socialist flag look like? And fascist of course.
Vladimir II said:
In Spanish, that is the fourth column, it is not 'Catalunya', is 'Cataluña'. Catalunya is in Catalan, not in Spanish.
1. Yes, thank you. I know how it is written in Spanish. But I have not seen the spelling mistake, as I copied the line from New Nations Mod, along many other names, so I have not read everything.
2. There is no fascist or socialist flag. You have all possibly misunderstood something. Union of Yugoslavia and Greece is not some my invention. It is a nation based on historical facts. While in exile, Yugoslav king Petar II, and Greek king Georgios III agreed that after the war they will form an united country. But after the war, Yugoslavia became socialist state, and Greece fell under Civil War, so the agreement was never executed. But if both dinasties return in cabinet after WWII, there should be events regarding this outcome.
2. There is no fascist or socialist flag. You have all possibly misunderstood something. Union of Yugoslavia and Greece is not some my invention. It is a nation based on historical facts. While in exile, Yugoslav king Petar II, and Greek king Georgios III agreed that after the war they will form an united country. But after the war, Yugoslavia became socialist state, and Greece fell under Civil War, so the agreement was never executed. But if both dinasties return in cabinet after WWII, there should be events regarding this outcome.
I see quite a few mistakes relating to ministers in Armageddon 1.2, mostly in Greece. I am not sure if you got them all as I refuse to look through 202 pages of posts. Maybe I'll help out after you release your first version.
If YUG is socialist,and the communists win the GCW,would the union be created?Vladimir II said:
The Great Duck said:
1) The mod where I told I want to participate was historical
2) All Yugoslavs were Slavs, most of them spoke Serbokroatian language, anyway all of them spoke Slav language. Greeks aren't Slavs and their language is not Slav language. Possiblities for forming such union is 0.1 %
Miihkali said:
Austria-Hungary.. An odd union that was. Still it worked surprisingly well. Two communist government could probably want to create some Balkan federation. UBSR. (Union of Balkan Soviet Republics
)Also a royalist union is as likely, once again Austria-Hungary is a perfect example.
Austria-Hungary was at the beginning just Austrian Empire, you know, Austrians spreaded their power over small nations (and some bigger also), but most of them let Austrians do that because nationalism hadn't yet became so hot. But in the 1800s nationalism grown and Austrians 'split' their empire into union.
The two nations without any connections (except same type of government) won't form union, or if will, they would do it slowly (taking over 50 years like European Union which still isn't federation, just union of independent nations). Soviets didn't force any nations to form unions (except those which they annexed), and any Eastern European communist nation didn't forge any unions.
And this is 1900s, not middle ages when the basis of Austria-Hungary was formed.
The two nations without any connections (except same type of government) won't form union, or if will, they would do it slowly (taking over 50 years like European Union which still isn't federation, just union of independent nations). Soviets didn't force any nations to form unions (except those which they annexed), and any Eastern European communist nation didn't forge any unions.
And this is 1900s, not middle ages when the basis of Austria-Hungary was formed.
I would give that union 25% chance of forming, in case of communist victory in both states.