Do you want more EU3?

[Earl Uhtred]

I'd buy it, assuming it adds meaningfully to the game.

 

[joak]

FWIW, I voted no. It's a very good set as it now stands; I'm not sure how much could be added in an expansion.

Also FWIW, I'm sure Paradox would get my $20 regardless if they make one.

 

[Zeitgeist]

The numbers have been pretty consistently between 80 and 90% today when I checked and I have a feeling that won't change much. Although to be sure, this poll placed here is a bit like going into a crack den and asking its inhabitants whether they would like another fix.

 

[Gatkramp]

The numbers have been pretty consistently between 80 and 90% today when I checked and I have a feeling that won't change much. Although to be sure, this poll placed here is a bit like going into a crack den and asking its inhabitants whether they would like another fix.

True. Most want it, and those who say they don't would still buy it.

 

[bippukt]

True. Most want it, and those who say they don't would still buy it.

I will go into rehab

 

[Austrischen]

implement a new sistem for the court and the country management like the ones from Crusader kings or EU Rome... new economical sistem that can reflect a true prosperity on the provinces... i'm not that full of imagination, but it can be added a lot of things...

the problem is, that a lot more people are waiting a new victoria with the EU3 engine... or a new CK...

You know... we all have that erotic dream to conquer the world trough the middle ages, the modern and finalley the comtemporary (CK+EU3+Victoria 2+ HOI3)... Specially the AARtists...

But. if to the game can be added something, should be at last related to the other games i have said...

how much have i paid for this game? 40 euros + 20 euros + 20 euros.... 80 euros!!!!!!!!! for god's sake... that's the most expensive videogame that i have bought!!!!! and it will probably be 20 euros more!!!!!!

After saying all this stuff it will surely sound crazy to say yes in this Poll D Damm EU3, you have taken over me) but i strongly ask you to reconsider a new game like Victoria 2 or CK 2, instead of a new expansion of this already "completed" game...

 

[Alerias]

Hi guys.

I know we've released a package of EU3 and all its expansions already and called it complete. But... We keep talking about eu3 regularly, bringing up new ideas on fleshing out gamemechanics, and improving flavor and playability. Me, Doomdark, King and other others of the team now have dozens up dozens of cool ideas for Eu3.

So, would you guys like another expansion pack for EU3 or do you view the game as complete?

(of course, we'll wrap up 3.2 first..)

I definitely want more! I was a little worried about the future of 3.2, but that patch aside, I definitely hope for more new features and more moddability of the features introduced in the last expansions!

 

[Skyman]

I would immediately buy another expansion if it is anything near as quality as In Nomine.

I'd rather the timeline stayed the same - the system already doesn't work quite as well for the extremes added in NA and IN in my opinion.

The biggest thing I'd love to see would be a character/dynasty system. Imagine replicating the Hapsburgs feat by actually arranging marriages and inheritances!

I also think this'd be a great opportunity to rebalance things - make the AI tougher overall, make world conquests harder, make the other countries in Europe able to stand up to the BBB better...

Edit: Oh, and as a New Worlder, an improved revolution system, where you can actually get large regions like the US to revolt at once, rather than piecemeal.

 

[OrangeYoshi]

Since EU4 seems at least a couple of years away, I voted yes. If they are just bug-fixes, they should stay as patches, but I trust Paradox wouldn't leach away out money while not adding any new meaningful features.

 

[Mac1]

Sure , get more.

But please dont forget to fix any bugs in current version.

I hope for some better AI, here few things:
- AI doesnt trade much, they usually stuck with 5 merchants, having massive gold - make them trade more
- AI makes inflation even when very rich
- AI doesnt improve artillery units
- AI doesnt turn off war taxes and fianllly die with WE on all wars.
- AI sometimes does really stupid big stacks that is way out of supply limit, and burns all MP from pool
- And please please make something, so AI wont ruin country taken for a bit in MP games (i mean at least no changing ideas, no taking decisions)


In other aspects i would like some difficulty in conquering and converting the world. I dont like orthodox/sunni china in 1500.

 

[ollobrains]

Im going a cautious yes. Only if it adds depth cleans up some aspects improves the mission system. ANd is done on consultation with the players

 

[ZhugeKongming]

Like others who voted no, I'd buy it if released but ultimately would prefer a new game, in this case CK2.

 

[Dietmar1982]

A expansion of the same quality as the previous two would be a guaranteed way of getting my money.

 

[Garak]

*ahem*

YES

 

[Skyman]

Like others who voted no, I'd buy it if released but ultimately would prefer a new game, in this case CK2.

I would too. But CK2 is a much greater investment of time and resources than another expansion for EU3.

 

[Garak]

I would too. But CK2 is a much greater investment of time and resources than another expansion for EU3.

I'd LOVE a CK2, also, but since this is asking simply about another EU3 expansion, I'm voting yes on that.

 

[Olaus Petrus]

I would too. But CK2 is a much greater investment of time and resources than another expansion for EU3.

I would be happy if Deus Vult would get the it's first patch at some point or another.

Seriously though, EU3 is flagship of Paradox and therefore it get's more development time than Rome, CK and Vicky which all would benefit more about new expansion than EU3, which is already pretty balanced game.

I'm bit sceptical about how much they can improve it, but maybe Johan will prove that I'm wrong and will bring something totally unexpected to EU3, although if that happens I would love to see same improvements in Rome (in similar manner like Vae Victis brings similar things to Rome as In Nomine brings to EU3).

 

[X_MasterDave_X]

Me, Doomdark, King and other others of the team now have dozens up dozens of cool ideas for Eu3.

So, would you guys like another expansion pack for EU3 or do you view the game as complete?

(of course, we'll wrap up 3.2 first..)

Well, tell us the ideas and ask again, pls.

 

[unmerged(37697)]

My thoughts

Just posted this in a similar thread, but thought I'd post it here also on the off-chance it catches Johan's eye.

With regards to some sort of royal family system, being able to choose your succession type (Salic law; eldest son then daughter like in Britain, &c.) would be cool, too.

That way, France for example could only have kings using its traditional system, but a liberal revolution could mean a constitutional queen of France.

Basically, IN is pretty polished as it is. I'd look forward to any positive changes/additions, but the main thing I've always wanted is a toned-down CK experience. I don't like CK myself (too complex, too boring) but having the role-play elements of it (court/royal family/heirs & spares) in EU3 would, for me, make it the best expansion to date.

If that were achieved, I wouldn't care whatsoever about changing the start/end dates.

EDIT: Oh, and following on from this - a better/more transparent succession war sequence. Being able to see before a war breaks out who the claimants are, and who the upcoming war is likely to be over. The majority of succession wars were not sudden, but simply waiting to happen...

 

[unmerged(485)]

EU III expansion? NO

Victoria II YES

CK II YES

EU IV YES