-
We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
admiral drake said:
Exactly, and if I am not misinformed it grew in size with 100% the last session. Not that many "Trade companies" / "Colonial enterprises" are mastered with such skill.
Daniel A said:Exactly, and if I am not misinformed it grew in size with 100% the last session. Not that many "Trade companies" / "Colonial enterprises" are mastered with such skill.
Daniel A, can you authorise my ICQ contact request?
I wish to tell you Drake would like you to play Austria for him tonight
. Perhaps he managed to tell you...
Barnius said:Daniel A, can you authorise my ICQ contact request?
I wish to tell you Drake would like you to play Austria for him tonight
Hi Barnius,
I will authorise!
Regarding tonight's game I just got the same request from JUV in a PM and I have answered him including some important info (that Drake also has). The answer was that I play bridge tonight and thus cannot play EU.
Daniel A said:Hi Barnius,
I will authorise!
Regarding tonight's game I just got the same request from JUV in a PM and I have answered him including some important info (that Drake also has). The answer was that I play bridge tonight and thus cannot play EU.
Sorry to hear that, let's all try finding a sub for Austria.
Brandenburg, Sweden, anyone: is the peace with Austria agreed?
But we still need an Austrian sub. AI or a RVS wont do. I have:
1. posted in the sub thread
2. ICQ my EU2 list
3. Asked certain trusted individuals
but still no luck...
1. posted in the sub thread
2. ICQ my EU2 list
3. Asked certain trusted individuals
but still no luck...
juv95hrn said:
I can play after 19CET if you still need an Austria...
I see I am not trusted individual
:rofl:
HALNY (HAL) said:I can play after 19CET if you still need an Austria...
I see I am not trusted individual
HAL!
Do I have your ICQ? What is it anyway?
Thanks Hal. smn is also willing to sub, so I guess we have insurance.
Edits done, leaders, palanas to France, Pfalz vassalage to France.
. smn is also willing to sub, so I guess we have insurance. Edits done, leaders, palanas to France, Pfalz vassalage to France.
About leaders:
Is there anyone except me that feels himself being swamped by random leaders, most of them no better or worse than the default ones? With no option to disband leaders I find it bothersome to micromanage my leaders, especially in thime of war.
Either we should allow for shorter pauses (say 30 sec) during war to allow for leader organisation without too much time pressure or maybe we should cut down on the number of leaders generated before each session?
Opinions?
Is there anyone except me that feels himself being swamped by random leaders, most of them no better or worse than the default ones? With no option to disband leaders I find it bothersome to micromanage my leaders, especially in thime of war.
Either we should allow for shorter pauses (say 30 sec) during war to allow for leader organisation without too much time pressure or maybe we should cut down on the number of leaders generated before each session?
Opinions?
King John said:
Good that Holland is finally in good terms with France, Scotland incident forgotten, because with Koeln annexed and Pfalz vassalised France is TOO CLOSE to Rhine border, and she officially didn't even claim it (no Chambers of Reunion event yet IIRC).
juv95hrn said:
the whole generating thing isn't quite clear to me anyway (I don't really know if/how I can finally get a better leader etc. )
I wouldn't mind if someone occasionally checked leaders.
btw. there's two ways to get rid of them:
1) load them on ship, disband ship
2) send them on a suicidal mission against rebels
Yay! Fun session. Lots of wars and stuff. I didnt fight one, which is the second session in a row now.
Dear Drake,
Do not think it is some kind of revenge for your not showing up last session of Delusion of Grandeur. I just have free time so I agree to sub.
So... well... uhm... How to say that? ... You lost Your Austria is totally beaten. First I lost war with BB and Sweden, than next war with BB (I dowed). Now you will probably lost another province (in first war you lost Anhalt).
I am really sorry for this situation but I was doing my best. I am not good in tactics against BB and KJ exploited that, I lost almost all battles with him.
I will never give up from this shame...
sorry
Do not think it is some kind of revenge for your not showing up last session of Delusion of Grandeur. I just have free time so I agree to sub.
So... well... uhm... How to say that? ... You lost
Your Austria is totally beaten. First I lost war with BB and Sweden, than next war with BB (I dowed). Now you will probably lost another province (in first war you lost Anhalt).I am really sorry for this situation but I was doing my best. I am not good in tactics against BB and KJ exploited that, I lost almost all battles with him.
I will never give up from this shame...
sorry
Hal, it's not that bad. You probably should've given in sooner, but Austria's only going to lose one province in this war, or maybe a couple vassals alternately. Your subbing is still quite appreciated.
Forzaa, luck of the draw. But generally the leaders you get will be crappy, and that's why I generate so many. You at least have some chance of getting a decent one now and then. It's not very hard to sort out the ones that suck anyway. Your methods work well enough. The other way is to spam click split and just send all the bad leaders to the middle of nowhere.
After 1685, we will be using average stats of 4 for leaders. Then we can generate less. I think 3 generals and 1 admiral per session would be reasonable.
.Forzaa, luck of the draw. But generally the leaders you get will be crappy, and that's why I generate so many. You at least have some chance of getting a decent one now and then. It's not very hard to sort out the ones that suck anyway. Your methods work well enough. The other way is to spam click split and just send all the bad leaders to the middle of nowhere.
After 1685, we will be using average stats of 4 for leaders. Then we can generate less. I think 3 generals and 1 admiral per session would be reasonable.
Another full session at war...
France joined Austria in their war vs. BB and SWE with the purpose of sealing NA of to Swedish expansion from the north. The Swedes were offered to stay at the coast but refused. Lots of recently conquered TPs were ruthlessly burnt to oust the Swedes. This was achieved.
Englanbd choose this time to make a successful sneak attack on France vulnurable for just such an attack and gaining lots of WS in the process. Over the years the French fought successfully, first in NA finally ousting ENG from there and then occupying French Italy (Genoa and Piemonte).
The French warship navy then went East to liberate the few French colonies occupied there. This was achieved successfully but when returning they met a smaller but better equipped (+1CRT) and better led (fire 6 leader) English squadron. This showed to be disasterous. Althoug the French admiral was quite skilled (555) and numbers were in french favour England sunk maybe 80 ships and won almost a dozens of battles.
Sweden choose this opportunity to try a 2nd grasp against NA. This time not vs Denmark but vs France. Battles are raging in the icy steppes of the north were attrition is a more dangerous foe than the enemy itself.
As it stands now France is defeated at sea but undefeated in the continent and in NA. It is expected that peace talks will be conducted during the week.
France lost over 200 WS and is lagging behind in tech. Not good at all!
France joined Austria in their war vs. BB and SWE with the purpose of sealing NA of to Swedish expansion from the north. The Swedes were offered to stay at the coast but refused. Lots of recently conquered TPs were ruthlessly burnt to oust the Swedes. This was achieved.
Englanbd choose this time to make a successful sneak attack on France vulnurable for just such an attack and gaining lots of WS in the process. Over the years the French fought successfully, first in NA finally ousting ENG from there and then occupying French Italy (Genoa and Piemonte).
The French warship navy then went East to liberate the few French colonies occupied there. This was achieved successfully but when returning they met a smaller but better equipped (+1CRT) and better led (fire 6 leader) English squadron. This showed to be disasterous. Althoug the French admiral was quite skilled (555) and numbers were in french favour England sunk maybe 80 ships and won almost a dozens of battles.
Sweden choose this opportunity to try a 2nd grasp against NA. This time not vs Denmark but vs France. Battles are raging in the icy steppes of the north were attrition is a more dangerous foe than the enemy itself.
As it stands now France is defeated at sea but undefeated in the continent and in NA. It is expected that peace talks will be conducted during the week.
France lost over 200 WS and is lagging behind in tech. Not good at all!
Last edited: