This is my issue. It seems that the only really versatile and dynamic playthrough, is the rebels. There you get to pick and choose who you ally with. It makes sense that tiersman desire independance and are only really willing to side with a fellow revolter against Kyros, I just feel that in the world of Tyranny, another path, presented as the lesser of evils (ie the solo Fatebinder) would have been a nice compromise between the rigid stupidity of the northern factions while sticking with Kyros over all and the path of outright rebellion. It's not like our PC is a nobody who's ability to get stuff done is questionable. Even the most recalcitrant opponent would be open to being swayed towards serving Kyros through the fatebinder, if it meant their societies wouldn't be entirely enslaved and wiped out. They might not bend the knee to Ashe or Nerat and I wouldn't blame them, but a fatebinder that had shown some level of respect and diplomacy and an interest in the long term prosperity of the tiers, would be a more attractive choice for submission. You catch more flies with honey than you do with vinegar. That would have been a playthrough more fitting with the solo route in my opinion.i got angry cause the disfavored path closes many (manyyyy) doors, but it made sense cause they dont budge, they dont care, they have their way and go with it no matter what, and it makes sense they eradicate everyone
the part that didnt make sense was the cairn choice in the stone sea, you have to be a douche and you have to make an unreasonable choice
however i made graven ashe bend the knee and that part was fun
then i went a chorus playthrough cause i wanted my mage to learn everything he can (seems you are closed to some magic by choosing the disfavored...)
so far i found a couple of sigils i didnt have before, and the game goes good, even made friend with the unbroken, conscripted them to the chorus...
and then i get to the oldwalls breach... damned gregor wont budge... so no matter what you do you are screwed
- 2