i love playing eu3, but i started reading born to purple a byzantine AAR of eu2 and i find my self thinking either all the stuff about senators, turkish presence, spy rings is added for the story or really awesome things fazed out by eu3 arrival. i am starting to become dissapointed in eu3 as things are becoming way too unhistoric ie austia covers all of eastern europe by 1525, i as the byzantines cover all south of alps and north of african terra incognita. eu2 seems to "keep things real". either chief ragusa does a heck of a job telling a story or im missing out. could anyone give me the headsup on the differences? thanks