Really enjoy DH 1914-1920. My question du jour is "How good is DH in the '36 campaign as opposed to AoD? What is similar? What is better?" I have not tried it yet. Thanks.
-
We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
some things it lacks like minor countries being more fun instead of always playing a major.
Well, I started as USSR...I am up to July '38...I see a lot of differences than AoD.
I agree, not easy playing as Finland when it takes 300+days to build an infantary division
It´s not easy to play with the USSR either when you can´t use the huge manpower reserve in a historical matter by grinding down Axis with attrition warfare. Something needs to be done about the building times. Perhaps allowing 'understrength'-divisions to be raised quicker as was done historically by many countries.
The 'Understrength'-divisions should also have a 'maximum strentgh' of less then 100 to not making them overpowered for countries with huge manpower reserves.
Militias will eat your manpower like hot cakes, and they'll help your tanks get to Berlin before Christmas '41. I believe only China can pump them without consequence, if even.