Devs/Custodians: Please show planetary automation some love

  • We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.

Calvax

General
47 Badges
Jan 23, 2017
1.947
6.050
  • Crusader Kings II: Charlemagne
  • Crusader Kings II
  • Crusader Kings II: Sword of Islam
  • Crusader Kings II: Sunset Invasion
  • Crusader Kings II: Sons of Abraham
  • Crusader Kings II: The Republic
  • Crusader Kings II: Rajas of India
  • Crusader Kings II: The Old Gods
  • Crusader Kings II: Legacy of Rome
  • Crusader Kings II: Monks and Mystics
  • Stellaris: Nemesis
  • Surviving Mars
  • Hearts of Iron IV: Death or Dishonor
  • Crusader Kings II: Jade Dragon
  • Hearts of Iron IV: Expansion Pass
  • Stellaris: Humanoids Species Pack
  • Stellaris: Apocalypse
  • Stellaris: Distant Stars
  • Surviving Mars: First Colony Edition
  • Prison Architect
  • Surviving Mars: First Colony Edition
  • Stellaris: Ancient Relics
  • Stellaris: Lithoids
  • Stellaris: Federations
  • Crusader Kings III
  • Stellaris: Necroids
  • Stellaris: Galaxy Edition
  • Cities: Skylines
  • Crusader Kings II: Way of Life
  • Crusader Kings II: Horse Lords
  • Crusader Kings II: Conclave
  • Cities: Skylines - Snowfall
  • Hearts of Iron IV: Together for Victory
  • Stellaris: Galaxy Edition
  • Hearts of Iron IV: Cadet
  • Crusader Kings II: Reapers Due
  • Victoria 2
  • Stellaris: Digital Anniversary Edition
  • Stellaris: Leviathans Story Pack
  • Stellaris
  • Victoria 2: A House Divided
  • Victoria 2: Heart of Darkness
  • Victoria: Revolutions
  • Stellaris: Megacorp
  • Stellaris: Distant Stars Pre-Order
  • Stellaris: Synthetic Dawn
  • Stellaris - Path to Destruction bundle
It's absolutely great that the general AI is getting attention an improvement. However, these features are independent of planetary automation which still does some poor and very frustrating things. I reported issues with strategic resources twice last year (1, 2) but got no response. Since automated planets don't know what each other is building they frequently leap to addressing deficits. It's easy to suddenly get a dozen automated planets trying to build the same thing at once, resulting in wild swings in what you're producing.

There are also a bunch of weird bugs like automated memorialist planets prioritising the memorialist building regardless of if consumer goods are negative. From the recent AI dev diary it was stated that automation is not part of that remit, I know there's a lot to do but could some attention be paid to this please? The sprawl and tall play might make this less of an issue for some play styles, but if you like the feeling of conquering the galaxy it's a real pain to micromanage or deal with frequent massive swings in resource production.
 
  • 2Like
  • 1
Reactions:

Arutar

First Lieutenant
47 Badges
May 10, 2017
265
116
  • Stellaris: Synthetic Dawn
  • Stellaris: Humanoids Species Pack
  • Stellaris: Digital Anniversary Edition
  • Stellaris: Leviathans Story Pack
  • Hearts of Iron IV: Together for Victory
  • Europa Universalis IV
  • Europa Universalis IV: Mandate of Heaven
  • Hearts of Iron IV: Death or Dishonor
  • Age of Wonders III
  • Hearts of Iron IV: Expansion Pass
  • Europa Universalis IV: Rights of Man
  • Stellaris: Apocalypse
  • Hearts of Iron IV: Expansion Pass
  • Stellaris: Distant Stars
  • Shadowrun: Dragonfall
  • Stellaris: Megacorp
  • Stellaris: Ancient Relics
  • Age of Wonders: Planetfall
  • Stellaris: Lithoids
  • Europa Universalis IV: El Dorado
  • Hearts of Iron IV: No Step Back
  • Stellaris: Nemesis
  • Stellaris: Necroids
  • Europa Universalis 4: Emperor
  • Crusader Kings III
  • Victoria 2
  • Stellaris: Federations
  • Hearts of Iron IV: La Resistance
  • Europa Universalis IV: Common Sense
  • Europa Universalis IV: Cossacks
  • Europa Universalis IV: Mare Nostrum
  • Stellaris
  • Stellaris: Galaxy Edition
  • Age of Wonders: Planetfall - Revelations
  • Stellaris: Galaxy Edition
  • Hearts of Iron IV: Cadet
  • Hearts of Iron IV: Colonel
  • Hearts of Iron IV: Expansion Pass
  • Stellaris - Path to Destruction bundle
  • Europa Universalis IV: Art of War
  • Europa Universalis IV: Conquest of Paradise
  • Europa Universalis IV: Wealth of Nations
  • Europa Universalis IV: Res Publica
  • Victoria: Revolutions
  • Victoria 2: A House Divided
  • Victoria 2: Heart of Darkness
  • Stellaris: Galaxy Edition
The sprawl and tall play might make this less of an issue for some play styles, but if you like the feeling of conquering the galaxy it's a real pain to micromanage or deal with frequent massive swings in resource production.
I am not disagreeing with you, but ever since the pop growth changes Id say there is very good reason not actually bothering to develop most fringe planets.

If I take over an average or worse planet, I quickly try to fix the basics of the planet (often just removing stuff) and leave the planet be for the rest of the game. The most important resource it provides is pops emigrating to my fully devolped core worlds / ring worlds / ecumenompolis etc. And now with ascension its even better to concentrate on fewer high pop worlds.

Honestly, the only thing I really want is to being able to mark such planets as "done" in the outlier (and maybe even optionally filtering these out completely).