Does someone using gunboats on you give _you_ a CB vs them? I can't see myself being able to use that much but it would make sense (and give the decision a possible drawback for the one using the navy as well)...
Does someone using gunboats on you give _you_ a CB vs them? I can't see myself being able to use that much but it would make sense (and give the decision a possible drawback for the one using the navy as well)...
Because only a nation that was militarily far superior to the other would use gunboat diplomacy, so will there have to be a disparity of power in game for it to occur? If the UK defualted would it be possible for France to use gunboat diplomacy because they have a largish fleet, though not nearly as large as the royal navy?No one ever decalred war on someone because of gunboat diplomacy.
At least up until patch 1.1.No it is based on fleet.
Upto a point, but this money is only for countries with low debt when there is no money available. We accept that some money may be created out of nowhere (although interest payments are a money sink) for the good of the game.
Only the loaner's tech I suppose, not the creditor's tech?Tech
I like this.
The economics of V2 is being handled in a very sensible way.
- Maybe this is a dumb question but I think this is the first time I've seen a CB mentioned for Victoria. Vicky 1 just hit you with a prestige penalty based on the difference between state scores. So how do CB's work? Less of a prestige penalty? Are there other CB's?
- Is the repayment order based on the size of the navy at the time of lending or at the time of repayment? So could you (involuntarily) make a bunch of loans, then be unable to collect them because a competing state narrowly pulled ahead in naval score?
- Just to clarify -- does a debtor state pay off the first state in full before moving on? Or does it pay a portion to all of its debtors, with the top state being paid off fastest?
- Can you explain the reasoning behind using naval power alone rather than total military score? If Russia's loaned a bunch of money to a small state on its border, the size of land forces matters way more than its naval force. It just seems like putting too much weight on the name "gunboat diplomacy" instead of modeling the abstract idea of using military force to collect debts.
Because only a nation that was militarily far superior to the other would use gunboat diplomacy, so will there have to be a disparity of power in game for it to occur? If the UK defualted would it be possible for France to use gunboat diplomacy because they have a largish fleet, though not nearly as large as the royal navy?
* What is the actual effect of being shelled?
* When your pops emigrate, do their bonds move with them, or stay behind?
* When you grind 2/3rds of your population into dust in WWI, does your remaining 1/3rd get to keep their bonds?
Only the loaner's tech I suppose, not the creditor's tech?
And what about revolters? For example we have USCA with a lot of debts which then is broken up into smaller countries. Will El Salvador as the rest of the USCA bear the burden of all the debts, or is there some way (via events?) that the burden is shared?
Interesting idea, but a couple of questions.
- Maybe this is a dumb question but I think this is the first time I've seen a CB mentioned for Victoria. Vicky 1 just hit you with a prestige penalty based on the difference between state scores. So how do CB's work? Less of a prestige penalty? Are there other CB's?
- Can you embargo or restrict lending to certain states? Or will every state lend to every other in any situation short of war?
- Will the game tell you when you are exhausting your domestic resources and approaching the threshold of international borrowing?
- Is the repayment order based on the size of the navy at the time of lending or at the time of repayment? So could you (involuntarily) make a bunch of loans, then be unable to collect them because a competing state narrowly pulled ahead in naval score?
- Just to clarify -- does a debtor state pay off the first state in full before moving on? Or does it pay a portion to all of its debtors, with the top state being paid off fastest?
- Can you explain the reasoning behind using naval power alone rather than total military score? If Russia's loaned a bunch of money to a small state on its border, the size of land forces matters way more than its naval force. It just seems like putting too much weight on the name "gunboat diplomacy" instead of modeling the abstract idea of using military force to collect debts.
Mainly to give you a good reason to maintain a large modern fleet. It is my considered opinion that paradox games tend to underrate naval power, so this mechanic is there to make naval power a more important part of you country decision making process instead of something you do when you have nothing else to do.
In the image, how come there's no Healthcare under the Social Spending slider?
I don't recall if Safety Standards are supposed to be part of Social Spending... but if so how come no that either?