Maybe, there will be some dlc divisions, we don't know...
The best Thing now, is to wait for the Divisions, that are already confirmed and see, what they will bring imo.
[DevBlog #11] 2e DB
- Thread starter EUG_MadMat
- Start date
-
We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
Maybe, there will be some dlc divisions, we don't know...
The best Thing now, is to wait for the Divisions, that are already confirmed and see, what they will bring imo.
If the lack of the M18, Valentine DD, and British Commandos makes this game unplayable for you, then don't buy it and leave the forums. All of us win in that case.
This is a division of phase A 1200 m tank (m10). Also retard mode greyhound rush can sometimes catch your opponnet off guard.
I guess, the Division does, what it should do, then. And that "retard mode Greyhound rush, catching your opponent off guard" is exactly, what they managed to do, participating in Operation Cobra, in some cases historically.
I imagine there will be Division DLC, id buy the 82nd Airborne, 1st, and 29th infantry divisions. 82nd would be 101st with higher vet and no M22s and 1st and 29th would just be reskins of the 2nd without xylophone but id still by them.
Why buy when you could actually mod them? Different vet and stuff could be modded IIRC.
As already explained, 82nd would be identical to 101st, with a bit more experienced.
Same with 1st & 29th ID and the existing 2nd ID, minus the latter's Xylophone.
I really enjoy playing as the 2e DB. Nice gameplay : fast-paced (in phase A) then fragile. The outcome of a match is unpredictable. Really nice !
Good job. Thx.
Good job. Thx.
I know, In my opinion thats why it makles the perfect DLC it doesnt add anything that breaks the game. It adds options for people who want to represent historical divisions its not a DLC that breaks the game and screws people who dont buy it, its a simple reskin for history buffs who want to play other divisions. There could be small differances like 29th having alot of replacements and lower vet to represent loses on D-Day itsself and 1st Infantry having Vets from Africa. It wouldnt change gameplay that much but add a little more variety for a few extra $ to support further development of the game. No pay to win here just slight tweak and a reskin.
Right now, the 2e DB deck has only 4 slots allocated to aircrafts while decks such as the Red Devils or the 101st have 7-8 slots for aircrafts.
That’s easily understandable in terms of gameplay and flavour as the 2e DB is not in the same need of air support for its ground forces.
But in terms of fun, I’d really like to see 1-2 slots added for the 2e DB aircrafts to have it a bit more aircraft-oriented
(whether these slots are new ones added to the current group of 36 slots and/or taken from another arms).
Currently, it's really hard to choose between all the air options of the deck (smokelayer/bomb DB7, recon plane, P-38s, Bomb/MG Spitfires...).
That’s easily understandable in terms of gameplay and flavour as the 2e DB is not in the same need of air support for its ground forces.
But in terms of fun, I’d really like to see 1-2 slots added for the 2e DB aircrafts to have it a bit more aircraft-oriented
(whether these slots are new ones added to the current group of 36 slots and/or taken from another arms).
Currently, it's really hard to choose between all the air options of the deck (smokelayer/bomb DB7, recon plane, P-38s, Bomb/MG Spitfires...).