If you have the data on how its happening, it might be a good idea to pass it onto Glavius so he can account for it when he updates his mod.
[Dev Team] 2.2.4 patch released, and 2.2.5 beta available [checksums 0019 & aab4]
- Thread starter Jamor
- Start date
-
We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
If you have the data on how its happening, it might be a good idea to pass it onto Glavius so he can account for it when he updates his mod.
Are you running Glavius' AI mod? Because I'm pretty sure that's where it's from. I saw it yesterday when I was playing before the 2.2.5 patch dropped today.
Maybe turn your mods off before posting "bug" reports ...
Oh yeah you guys are right, thought that mod just changed Ai behavior.
Due to the way PDX implemented jobs, changing AI behavior force mods to overwrite the entire job declaration.
I've got a bit of a question, since there's all sorts of new building triggers coming to live - how do I handle primitive capitals in my mods? Are they going to convert if I list them to convert? Should I use destroy trigger?
* Free movement faction demand no longer cares about robots or their rights
finally ... how I hated this one
finally ... how I hated this one
So when do you plan to take a look at the current sector system? Since right now it isn't in the best place.
# Balancing
Much need pop-growth adjustment. Less Consumer Good cost for pops living on low habitality planets
Mineral Extraction got quite a hard push again. Slighty curious. Something to do with Refineries, Arcology and the non-existence of minerals on Ring World and Habitat.
Okay, overall buff for Resource Districts (maybe utilize more often housing Districts).
# UI
- Proposed Commercial Pacts don't give me the Benefits (only if I do ask them).
- Research Agreements have only the technology level (victory log) and the constant bickering of the AI as an indicator for your desire for agreements
# AI
- Max. 2 Buildings per planet isn't a good solution in regards to Alloy Foundry and Consumer Goods less research lab
- Maybe they should be focused more on buildings districts and less on the utilizing of a new building slot
- Luckily you adressed the problem building for slots sake. Should help the AI with the problem of promoting jobs
# Bugfix
Yes, I do hope promoting is now more smooth. Let's look how that fares with gene-modding and multi-species empires.
Bubbles thought he can take the pirates alone. He was wrong. I would like to let him retire instead.
Would like to see some change in Trade. Starbases focused on Trade Hubs don't collect Trade on systems with a starbase (without Trade Hubs). I am disincentivized to build starbases on systems with planets that are 1-3 jumps away and risk even more piracy. As of right now either i beeline starbases to get as much Deep Space Black Sites or I just don't even collect Trade.
As sector management got a sticky. I do hope for some changes in the near future.
Much need pop-growth adjustment. Less Consumer Good cost for pops living on low habitality planets
Mineral Extraction got quite a hard push again. Slighty curious. Something to do with Refineries, Arcology and the non-existence of minerals on Ring World and Habitat.
Okay, overall buff for Resource Districts (maybe utilize more often housing Districts).
# UI
- Proposed Commercial Pacts don't give me the Benefits (only if I do ask them).
- Research Agreements have only the technology level (victory log) and the constant bickering of the AI as an indicator for your desire for agreements
# AI
- Max. 2 Buildings per planet isn't a good solution in regards to Alloy Foundry and Consumer Goods less research lab
- Maybe they should be focused more on buildings districts and less on the utilizing of a new building slot
- Luckily you adressed the problem building for slots sake. Should help the AI with the problem of promoting jobs
# Bugfix
Yes, I do hope promoting is now more smooth. Let's look how that fares with gene-modding and multi-species empires.
Bubbles thought he can take the pirates alone. He was wrong. I would like to let him retire instead.
Would like to see some change in Trade. Starbases focused on Trade Hubs don't collect Trade on systems with a starbase (without Trade Hubs). I am disincentivized to build starbases on systems with planets that are 1-3 jumps away and risk even more piracy. As of right now either i beeline starbases to get as much Deep Space Black Sites or I just don't even collect Trade.
As sector management got a sticky. I do hope for some changes in the near future.
This shouldn't happen in the live 2.2.4.
We're currently working on these issues for the AI.
There's a chance but the problem right now is we have so many sliders already, we badly need a start screen redesign. One was in the works, and we'll probably resurrect it at some point in the future, but not the near future.
Thank you! We're glad you enjoy itSO MANY FIXES AND BALANCE CHANGES!
Well, this is a personal opinion and not necessarily shared by the design team, but I find them OP, so...
If you want them to convert, you'll need to give them a convert building list, and the potential triggers will be used to determine when the building is no longer viable.
If you only want the building to get destroyed in specific circumstances, you should use the destroy trigger (and not use the potential trigger for this)
Two fixes I would love to see and I was surprised not to in this batch:
1) pathfinding always codesch to go through l-gates as fastest route, even when I don't have access to mode within the territory occupying the l-sector.
2) cannot cancel guarantee independence glitch with empires that have gained independence (in my case, from a former horde) but not by rebellion.
1) pathfinding always codesch to go through l-gates as fastest route, even when I don't have access to mode within the territory occupying the l-sector.
2) cannot cancel guarantee independence glitch with empires that have gained independence (in my case, from a former horde) but not by rebellion.
Oh interesting. On paper they have some weak looking mechanics, such as no level 4 unity building and fewer synapse drones on their upgraded hive capital. But the sheer pop numbers and growth speed is hard to argue with.
I think Hive Minds are the funnest empire right now, mind you, I was just curious since hive minds and machine empires are frequently compared ATM and this beta patch just hyper buffed machines (which really needed it though).
EDIt: Oh and is Post-Apocalyptic receiving both survivor and tomb world habitability intended? I mean my OCD screams whenever I see the survivor trait because I know that tomb world habitability already exists, but having them both on the same species from the start feels a little weird. I'd love to see Tomb World Habitability remain, if only for my OCD.
How Exactly was this fixed?
Was a timer added to reduce the rate they switched jobs, or do they not switch jobs at all, and the new specialist jobs just wait for pop growth to fill them?
The "No social mobility for you!" line, makes me think its the second option.
You sure about that? Entries in 11_primitive_buildings use both, ie "building_stone_palace"
Code:
potential = {
exists = owner
owner = {
is_primitive = yes
OR = {
has_country_flag = bronze_age
has_country_flag = iron_age
has_country_flag = late_medieval_age
has_country_flag = renaissance_age
has_country_flag = steam_age
}
}
}
destroy_trigger = {
exists = owner
owner = {
is_primitive = no
}
}
convert_to = {
building_hive_capital
building_machine_capital
building_colony_shelter
}
There are a lot of production increases included, I'm curious if that might not be a bit too much of "bettering".
In addition, I often read machine empire, but was not the hive mind somewhat broken as well?
In addition, I often read machine empire, but was not the hive mind somewhat broken as well?
Since Citizen Service got a buff, is there any chance we could see a similar buff for Warrior Culture?
I think +1 Unity per Soldier job would be totally reasonable, personally, as +20% Army damage and -20% Army upkeep is arguably weaker than +15% Naval Capacity, anyway.
There are of course, many other options, but I'd love to see a small nudge for the civic.
...Well, either that, or a general buff for ground combat being able to act as a semi-viable alternative to space combat. Like, a 'Hostile Landing' tech that allows a ground invasion even while the system's fortress is still alive, maybe. *shrug*
I think +1 Unity per Soldier job would be totally reasonable, personally, as +20% Army damage and -20% Army upkeep is arguably weaker than +15% Naval Capacity, anyway.
There are of course, many other options, but I'd love to see a small nudge for the civic.
...Well, either that, or a general buff for ground combat being able to act as a semi-viable alternative to space combat. Like, a 'Hostile Landing' tech that allows a ground invasion even while the system's fortress is still alive, maybe. *shrug*
