Defeat After Deceit

[unmerged(80795)]

In any case with the current roster I do believe you will have an altogether different austrian experience than before. It would be a test to your mettle, Ulschmidt, with dangerous powers all around you.

What say you? Aye to a challenge?

Are you understimating my comrades? the only veterans who gratifyingly surprised me during these months were John and Tonio, the rest of you are quite mortal, just like me.

No, thank you, I prefer motivation than powergamming. May i suggest placing newcomers in central countries and veterans in peripherical positions?

About my previous campaign, NCause, Duque and Grabah are, from my point of view, very reliable, responsible mates, I'd bet my house for them, if i had any... count with them, construct a community and don't let it fall, you as.h.les.

 

[bluelotus]

About my previous campaign, NCause, Duque and Grabah are, from my point of view, very reliable, responsible mates, I'd bet my house for them, if i had any... count with them, construct a community and don't let it fall, you as.h.les.

No offens Schmidt, but how are we supposed to get places for them? We seem to be full and FAL's hosting ability is limited too. You can't expect that he can host for 15 or more player.

 

[unmerged(10915)]

Hmm, problem coming up. I will be going to Morocco from the 5th of March to the 2nd of April. After that, I will be going to Istanbul from the 9th to the 21st. This means thtat I will miss something like 5-8 sessions at startup. Obviously I am not going to put 10+ people through such a mess, so scratch me off the roster.

 

[unmerged(18425)]

Is this the version of 1492 we will be using?

http://www.europa2.ru/cgi-bin/leagu...season=Valkyrie.net IX&lang=eng&yearsave=1492

Poland has there infra level 1, might want to make it 2.

 

[unmerged(80795)]

No offens Schmidt, but how are we supposed to get places for them? We seem to be full and FAL's hosting ability is limited too. You can't expect that he can host for 15 or more player.

Many of you're playing in other campaigns.

your lack of humour torments me. Oh no no, I wanted to say, "you... assimilate and be honest, and les is my name: Luis Emiliano Soralla

 

[bluelotus]

Many of you're playing in other campaigns.

your lack of humour torments me. Oh no no, I wanted to say, "you... assimilate and be honest, and les is my name: Luis Emiliano Soralla

Well to be honest in your case I can hardly tell wheter you are joking or talking seriously no matter what the case is.

 

[bluelotus]

By the way, could anyone upload watk 3.1 with the fix or send it over to me by any chance? All the link in the watk thread were dead for the 3.1 version.

 

[BurningEGO]

I am very much open to modding the WatK package as EGO has done in his mod (perhaps even using his mod as foundation).

Ahum, how much sessions till QFC ends?

 

[PJL]

On Time Bonuses will most definetly not be dropped. Sorry, PJL, but I have had to endure too much nervekilling torture waiting for some latecomers in V-net. It kills the fun of all that are ontime and leads to a vicious circle where noone deems it worthwhile to turn up punctualy anymore.

Well I don't mind on time bonuses as such, just that in this case they should on time rather than 10 mins early. But seeing as you've already organised a player roster then I guess it's a moot point anyway.

 

[PJL]

I 100% Agree. The income levels gathered from WatK are insane.

However, fixing it with inflation is not such a good idea IMO. Those with lucky deflation events would profit too much.

Perhaps we should just mod the WatK package and curb overall income, like EGO has done for his mod.

A much simpler option would be to play vanilla.

Even with Ego's mod, it still feels a lot more than vanilla - any chance they could be toned down lower. I'm not really a fan of late game EU2 military tech wars, and anything that slows that down would be good.

 

[unmerged(63809)]

No offens Schmidt, but how are we supposed to get places for them? We seem to be full and FAL's hosting ability is limited too. You can't expect that he can host for 15 or more player.

If there is a shortage of space available in the campaign and a more senior and experienced member of the community is left out I wouldn't be offended if Amp removed me from the list. With that said, I do want to play.

 

[Ampoliros]

Are you understimating my comrades? the only veterans who gratifyingly surprised me during these months were John and Tonio, the rest of you are quite mortal, just like me.

Well I'm quite confident that if the current roster more or less stays the way it is now you are in for quite a surprise.

No, thank you, I prefer motivation than powergamming. May i suggest placing newcomers in central countries and veterans in peripherical positions?

Not really my cup of tea. Also as we have a lot of vets in our campaign not feasible.

About my previous campaign, NCause, Duque and Grabah are, from my point of view, very reliable, responsible mates, I'd bet my house for them, if i had any... count with them, construct a community and don't let it fall, you as.h.les.

I'm sure they are. And this very certainly won't be the last campaign taking place.

 

[Ampoliros]

Is this the version of 1492 we will be using?

http://www.europa2.ru/cgi-bin/leagu...season=Valkyrie.net IX&lang=eng&yearsave=1492

Poland has there infra level 1, might want to make it 2.

This indeed is the version we will be using. We will tweak it (for example the Polandthingy) and modify the tradevalues so as to decrease the general wealth level ingame however.

 

[Ampoliros]

Hmm, problem coming up. I will be going to Morocco from the 5th of March to the 2nd of April. After that, I will be going to Istanbul from the 9th to the 21st. This means thtat I will miss something like 5-8 sessions at startup. Obviously I am not going to put 10+ people through such a mess, so scratch me off the roster.

Too bad to see you go again.
Would have been fun...
Well I was certain something like this would come up with someone - it always does. Luckily I have a Plan B.

 

[Van Engel]

I think Bob's suggestion is quite a good one, no more TAs.

 

[unmerged(43658)]

new campaign.
nice.
i want piece of the action.
(and what's with denamark and bavaria?! i would rather take persia or something..)
i need my eu2 fix. eu2 is only game you can play online while drinking coffee and smoking cigarettes so gm please find a spot

 

[King John]

A Persia would be cool. I kind of think Denmark would interact more, especially early on, but it wouldn't matter too much. Bigger question is what Fal can host.

 

[unmerged(43658)]

A Persia would be cool. I kind of think Denmark would interact more, especially early on, but it wouldn't matter too much. Bigger question is what Fal can host.

yes but wouldn't it kill sweeden..?
denmark is imho sweden on steroids in early game and weak shadow of sweden in late game. that wouldn't be so much of a problem as its inability to coexist with sweden peacefully.
if we have both one player could be looking for a new country after session one

 

[BurningEGO]

denmark is imho sweden on steroids in early game and weak shadow of sweden in late game. that wouldn't be so much of a problem as its inability to coexist with sweden peacefully.

With that kind of thinking, you wouldnt allow Poland or even Austria to exist since they can easily annex Bradenburg should they want to.

 

[Ampoliros]

new campaign.
nice.
i want piece of the action.
(and what's with denamark and bavaria?! i would rather take persia or something..)
i need my eu2 fix. eu2 is only game you can play online while drinking coffee and smoking cigarettes so gm please find a spot

Greetings, Grabah.

For now we will stick to the already mentioned secondary countries i.e. Denmark, Bavaria and Palatinate. A peripheral power such as Persia is far less interesting anyways than Denmark, Bavaria or Palatinate would be. Just look at Goetterdaemmerung I. There Bavaria ended up annexing Austria....