There is a vast breadth of departure from the old log-style, so I would urge you to explore them. Many of them straddle the grey area I talked about, and include plenty of game details.
-
We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
Its really up to personal taste, but I say rather than have ghastly labels plastered everywhere, take the time to have a nice little look and maybe a read.
I think that given the effort that most people put into their AARs, it is only fair to at least give them a couple of minutes to give the AAR a quick "look-over", rather than have the authors label their AARs, labelling that (as I realize) won't have any chance at being consistent or accurate anyway 
Well when does the labelling stop? Do we start to have "excellent", "good", "at least he tried" and "crap" AAR labels in the title as well just to err on the side of caution?
I hardly think the Oscaars are going to go into the business of labelling "crap" submissions.