Good or bad terrific?
I guess good...
Terrific = great, I think you're maybe confusing it with terrible = bad. I thought it was good.
-
We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
Terrific = great, I think you're maybe confusing it with terrible = bad. I thought it was good.
@ ewphoenix123
Why don't you update the link for the ID map of Europe from 1936. Current link is down. I just never get bored from looking at it
Why don't you update the link for the ID map of Europe from 1936. Current link is down. I just never get bored from looking at it
Is it posible that you add zoming provinces on some extra land small provicnes on continents??????
well because of Rijeka. Rijeka was indenpedente town/state 1920/1924, and Italy anexed it on 16 March 1924.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_State_of_Fiume
read.
And baranja, medjumurije, Prekomurije.
And you also can add Uzicka republika as indenpedente country during ww2 in balkans.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Republic_of_Užice
I mean some extra provice for map from this link on wikipedia.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_State_of_Fiume
read.
And baranja, medjumurije, Prekomurije.
And you also can add Uzicka republika as indenpedente country during ww2 in balkans.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Republic_of_Užice
I mean some extra provice for map from this link on wikipedia.
You should add all those countries that exists in the beginning of the game.
See this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Former_countries_in_Europe_after_1815
This should be added: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moldavian_Democratic_Republic
And maybe some events about this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cretan_Turks
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exchange_of_Greek_and_Turkish_Populations
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greco-Turkish_War_(1919-1922)
See this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Former_countries_in_Europe_after_1815
This should be added: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moldavian_Democratic_Republic
And maybe some events about this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cretan_Turks
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exchange_of_Greek_and_Turkish_Populations
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greco-Turkish_War_(1919-1922)
It's strange how Balkan always gets in the center of attention as soon as it comes to maps and such
I'll start a flamewar about Sweden and it's misplaced/misnamed/etc/etc/etc provinces in a thread near you soon just in order to get some balance in here.
I'll start a flamewar about Sweden and it's misplaced/misnamed/etc/etc/etc provinces in a thread near you soon just in order to get some balance in here.
It's strange how Balkan always gets in the center of attention as soon as it comes to maps and such
I'll start a flamewar about Sweden and it's misplaced/misnamed/etc/etc/etc provinces in a thread near you soon just in order to get some balance in here.
Well Sweeden is in other part of the world. No so much wars, and there fore no actually great and fast changes. Balkan is a gunpowder barrel.
It's strange how Balkan always gets in the center of attention as soon as it comes to maps and such
I'll start a flamewar about Sweden and it's misplaced/misnamed/etc/etc/etc provinces in a thread near you soon just in order to get some balance in here.
Little attention around here is the price you Swedes have to pay for being the most peaceful corner in the world for the last 200 years
It's strange how Balkan always gets in the center of attention as soon as it comes to maps and such
I'll start a flamewar about Sweden and it's misplaced/misnamed/etc/etc/etc provinces in a thread near you soon just in order to get some balance in here.
That's because Balkan people have a nasty habit of hating all their neighbours.
I'm not in a position to make the decision, so this is just my opinion.
Micronations, and definitly micro-provinces, should not be added to the game unless they could have HISTORICALLY had a MILITARY impact on the game. By this, I mean that they should be able to at least slow down even a smaller power from a military conquest. Of course there ARE some exceptions to this. Luxumbourg - because it is 'grandfathered' in by existing in Vanilla HOI2. The Free City of Danzig, because of the unique impact it had on WWII. Other than those 2, I can't think of any other micronations that should be included in the game. As for micro-provinces, I have already given my opinion, and the reasoning behind it. The use of zoomed provinces should again be reserved for those areas that were HISTORICALLY significant, not just some strip of land that changed hand because of some minor treaty.
Micronations, and definitly micro-provinces, should not be added to the game unless they could have HISTORICALLY had a MILITARY impact on the game. By this, I mean that they should be able to at least slow down even a smaller power from a military conquest. Of course there ARE some exceptions to this. Luxumbourg - because it is 'grandfathered' in by existing in Vanilla HOI2. The Free City of Danzig, because of the unique impact it had on WWII. Other than those 2, I can't think of any other micronations that should be included in the game. As for micro-provinces, I have already given my opinion, and the reasoning behind it. The use of zoomed provinces should again be reserved for those areas that were HISTORICALLY significant, not just some strip of land that changed hand because of some minor treaty.
First off, Luxembourg and Danzig are not really micro provinces anymore. Secondly, very few provinces on the map had individually a direct military impact on the war historically. I can't think of any American provinces that fits such demands, so you might just want all of USA represented as one province. There are many reasons for including Luxembourg, it isn't only there because it is "grandfathered" in by existing in Vanilla HOI2.
The micro provinces you'll see on the map are not there just because we like some micro provinces here and there. They are present because people perceive them as significant, so I think you miss the point by calling them all insignificant.
1) Luxembourg and Danzig were not part of the post about Micro-provinces, but micro-nations. Neither had, or could have had, a significant military. Remember that HOI2 and DH are Strategic War Games, not Diplomatic games. Danzig needs to be included because of it leading to the invasion of Poland. Luxembourg because it is already in the game. Micro-nations like Monaco, Lichtenstein, Rijeka, etc. don't and shouldn't be included in the game.
2) What I meant about micro-provinces was size. A lot of people are asking for the ability to use the vanilla DH map to model every change in the borders during the 20th century. This would require very small provinces which would be unusable (no room for a counter or sprite, plus icons for an Airbase, AA, Rocket Test Site, Nuclear Test Site, Beach and Port Icon and still be able to click on the province). That is why these micro-provinces shouldn't be included. PS: There is no easy way to use "zoomed" provinces in the Balkans, even the Adriatic is too small to allow any. You could artificially inflate the size of some of the provinces (like is done for some of the capitals), but that defeats the purpose of trying to model the borders doesn't it?
Will Vaduz be or not to be?
That's the question.
No, it's not relevant for our game.
Will Vaduz be or not to be?
That's the question.
Let's see
Liechtenstein = 160 square km
Vaduz = 17.3 square km
NEITHER are big enough to be relevant in a Grand Strategy Game
Well it was on a picture of the map. Under the province of Venice....
So you removed it, I guess.....
