I'm guessing Ottomans will be exempt? They are in the culture group. They would form Arabia nearly every game and that would be silly.Arabia will be formable as a culture union in 1.8.
I'm guessing Ottomans will be exempt? They are in the culture group. They would form Arabia nearly every game and that would be silly.Arabia will be formable as a culture union in 1.8.
I'm guessing Ottomans will be exempt? They are in the culture group. They would form Arabia nearly every game and that would be silly.
We'd have to know the province requirements for forming Arabia, but you are right that an Ottoman A.I. would probably fail to take select important cities if not guided by missions. Ottomans turning into Arabia sounds like a bad idea at any rate. We all know they don't belong in that culture group in the first place, and that it was just done to put their path of conquest as a more tolerated culture.Actually, I only see them conquer stuff like Oman rarely. Sometimes they don't even have all of the provinces that comprise Iraq.
We'd have to know the province requirements for forming Arabia, but you are right that an Ottoman A.I. would probably fail to take select important cities if not guided by missions. Ottomans turning into Arabia sounds like a bad idea at any rate. We all know they don't belong in that culture group in the first place, and that it was just done to put their path of conquest as a more tolerated culture.
Maghreb as a possible state to form is needed too.
Maghreb as a possible state to form is needed too.
Arabia will be formable as a culture union in 1.8.
While they are at it they should improve germanys flag.
Maghreb as a possible state to form is needed too.
They should use an coat of arms that actually looks like an eagle and not like a mutated chicken- Maybe something like this:And into what exactly?
What they should improve though is the colour of Germany. This strange grey is simply disgusting.
Not to be nitpicking but this state is already in game it's known as Morocco for Europeans. Its Arabic name is Al-Maghrib. So it makes sense like France forming France. Besides what's point of forming it? Most of provinces are Berber and few Maghrebi so you'll get everyone of them accepted anyway. If it is possible to do cross culture union to add accepted Sub-Saharan(or at least Tuareg) and Andalucian then i'm ok with it
In that case, would a name like Al-Ifriqiya be more suitable? As far as the benefits, it would ideally remove the cores of the member nations like Algeria, Tunisia, Tripoli, and Morocco as well as have some other benefits like a permanent modifier.
Not to be nitpicking but this state is already in game it's known as Morocco for Europeans. Its Arabic name is Al-Maghrib. So it makes sense like France forming France. Besides what's point of forming it? Most of provinces are Berber and few Maghrebi so you'll get everyone of them accepted anyway. Without adding more culture like Kabylie, Chaoui, Chenouas, Mzab, Zenata it's little to no use. If it is possible to do cross culture union to add accepted Sub-Saharan(or at least Tuareg) and Andalucian then i'm ok with it
now that looks like a mutated chicken. do you really consider that to be an eagle? maybe dead, burnt eagle. with jaundice.They should use an coat of arms that actually looks like an eagle and not like a mutated chicken- Maybe something like this:
![]()
Out of curiosity, what countries in EU4 were formed only after 1918? I didn't think there were any.
They're adding new nations in North Africa. They're probably adding the cultures too.Actually Al-Ifriqiya it's area of countries Tunis and Tripoli....
As i stated above without culture like Kabylie, Chaoui, Chenouas, Mzab, Zenata it's little to no use to form any country. I'd rather see restoring Almohad Caliphate( or Banu Abd-ul-Mumminin) if you own land of Morocco, Algiers, Tunis, Tripoli, Granada and Cordoba and this would maybe add accepted culture though not necessery with cultures as are now.
If we they can't give us the black, white, and red flag, can they at least improve visuals of the current flag? That ugly bird needs to be replaced with something more badass looking.. also the ugly yellow color needs to get out of here.And into what exactly? both Black-White-Red and Black-Red-Gold where products of their times. Black-White-Red is a combination of Prussia's Black-White and the White-Red of the hanseatic cities and was adopted by the Northgerman Federation. In EU4, any German nation that's not Austria or the HRE can form Germany, and no of the three large german hanseatic cities are required to form it. Black-Red-Gold on the other hand were the colours of the uniforms worn by the Lützow Free Corps (baclk coat, red trim, brass buttons), which was the only egiment fighting in the coalition wars that had members from all over Germany. Given that the napoleonic wars will not happen like in real life, with the diploatic frontlines probably being aligned very differently, and that such a military unit is not possible ingame, this flag doesn't make sense either. Although I would love ift a "Lützowsches Freikorps" event could fire for all German States in the early 19th century if there is a war raging. (Maybe lose a bit of manpower and money for a prestige bonus as long as the war in question is active or something)
What they should improve though is the colour of Germany. This strange grey is simply disgusting.