Crusader states, what about them?

[Birger]

Will they (or their dynasties) be playable??
I've looked everywhere but I can't find any info...

 

[Johan]

yes, in the 1187 scenario, Kingdom of Jerusalem and the others still exist

 

[unmerged(18215)]

But what if I as a Vassal of the French crown conquers parts of Tunisia will I become the ruler of that kingdom then?

 

[Birger]

Cool, even Antioch?

 

[unmerged(18269)]

It depends on which scenario.

 

[Birger]

I take that as a yes.

 

[Jerzy_I]

But what if I as a Vassal of the French crown conquers parts of Tunisia will I become the ruler of that kingdom then?

That would be up to the French king. Although a good question is how are crusading states created? Is it automaticly a seperate kingdom or can the king decide to keep provinces as demese or giving as a fief ?

 

[Phystarstk]

First game: Some celtic nation to re-celtify England.
Second game: Byzantine to recreate the glory of the Roman empire.
and now, Third game: Jerusalem to make it a glorified vision of a united and strong holy land.



I MIGHT play some easy first dynasty to get my feet wet, but this is definitely my plan.

 

[Earl Uhtred]

First game: Some celtic nation to re-celtify England.

Ugh. I wanna take some Northern earl and boot the Normans.

 

[Jerzy_I]

Ugh. I wanna take some Northern earl and boot the Normans.

Heh...Take a swedish jarl and boot the normans creating a new viking kingdom.

Have to use Swedish cause you know they will have hardcoded bonuses to their peoples stats and probably the best looking women heh.

 

[unmerged(18269)]

But what if I as a Vassal of the French crown conquers parts of Tunisia will I become the ruler of that kingdom then

Depends on 3 factors, Iam not sure if I can explain more cuz of the NDA though.
Anyways there can be guranteed 2 outcomes and 2 outcomes that are theoreticly possible.
You would want outcome number 2 and the 1st theoretical outcome.

Is it automaticly a seperate kingdom

In one patch it was and in one patch it wasnt.

 

[Jerzy_I]

Thanks for the Info even though your not allowed to say much we are also glad for more info!!.

 

[Earl Uhtred]

Anyways there can be guranteed 2 outcomes and 2 outcomes that are theoreticly possible.
You would want outcome number 2 and the 1st theoretical outcome.

That's less than useful, but thanx...

 

[Havard]

That's less than useful, but thanx...

NDAs doesn't allow us to be very useful, I'm afraid.

 

[Snall]

Evil lawyer satan pacts....

 

[muttoneer]

Heh...Take a swedish jarl and boot the normans creating a new viking kingdom.

I think the Normans are going to come in for a bit of a hammering all round...

I hope there'll be plenty of chances to create Crusader Kingdoms in the east in the 1066 game, not just play as a preexisting one in 1187...

 

[dtroiani]

I can't wait to play as a Crusader state...

 

[unmerged(18269)]

Its just like a regular state. Except closer to Muslims.

 

[Phystarstk]

""Quote:
But what if I as a Vassal of the French crown conquers parts of Tunisia will I become the ruler of that kingdom then
Depends on 3 factors, Iam not sure if I can explain more cuz of the NDA though.
Anyways there can be guranteed 2 outcomes and 2 outcomes that are theoreticly possible.
You would want outcome number 2 and the 1st theoretical outcome.
Quote:
Is it automaticly a seperate kingdom
In one patch it was and in one patch it wasnt.""

Im surprised hes even allowed to say this stuff
Didn't he already overstep the NDA?

 

[Nikolai]

He was at least very close to the line between it. If he didn't get some kind of approval then. But I guess the post would have been deleted if not?