Crusader Kings II: Rajas of India - Patchnotes and Ask us anything! [2.1.1 CFYM]
- Thread starter Groogy
- Start date
-
We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
- Status
Actually I want there would be less changes.
Last time you promise fully moddable cardinal system. Turn out, the cardinal only work with theocracy character
i think some trait should change AI action
EX: Ambitious character should keep grow his country , more Aggression
all AI just don't do anything when late game , they just keep their de jure land then waiting for death
it's too bored and not realistic
EX: Ambitious character should keep grow his country , more Aggression
all AI just don't do anything when late game , they just keep their de jure land then waiting for death
it's too bored and not realistic
Last edited:
Would be nice to have one more somewhere, even a Manichean near Tarim Basin, for flavors sake (even if in AI hands he would rapidly be unlanded or converted). Afghanistan could quite realistically have a Zoroastrian vassal under Shahi's I would say. So please reconsider adding someone, somewhere.
More questions:
- Aside from Socotra, are there any other playable Nestorians in "Old Gods" start.
- Are there any playable Nestorians in 1066 start?
- Are there any playable Zoroastrians in India at 1066 start?
- Are you fixing Zoroastrian holy war icon?
- Is there going to be Messalian heresy in the game at some stage? (Edit: Duh, only now saw it in patches)
- Have you added any new titular titles to game?
- Why no Kara-Khitai?
Last edited:
Rajas of India includes new Indian unit models, but no specific holy order models. The same applies for the Turkish unit pack, no specific holy order models.
There is no pagan/non-pagan separation in neither the Indian portraits (included in the expansion), nor with the Turkish portraits.
Reply to post by yclept.
Merchant republic keep the old heir designation but might be moved to use the new one eventually.
Merchant republic keep the old heir designation but might be moved to use the new one eventually.
Last edited:
Yes, they get one each. No, they don't get special sprites in the DLC or patch.
It's similar to Orthodox.
No. But you can play in India at the earliest Old Gods start date of 867 if you also have that DLC.
Lots of new events and decisions related to India are DLC-exclusive.
Yes.
No need to sacrifice, you can already do this
But you need to disable the Sunset Invasion DLC if you want to use the "random new world" option when converting your saved game to EU4.There is a de jure Kingdom of Delhi. It will be available at game start if you choose a later date (it was historically established in the early 13th century).
The first one is done by checking if the religion is cathar. The second one is done through the is_feminist flag in the religions file.
Yes.
More screenshots including portraits coming very soon. Watch the forums and the facebook page.
You need to own Rajas of India to get the new Indian unit models and portraits, yes. Everyone will, however, get a free complimentary gratis War Elephant.
This is a bit of a departure from how we usually do things, with separate cosmetic DLCs and all, but we figured that with the scope of Rajas we might as well do things a bit differently.
So 8 pages and no answer to my question so I'll repeat it.
Has there been added any sort of failsafe or backup-save system to the Ironman mode? Since this is a game that takes over 100hours to go from 800-1400th, and there is no backup, I would like to know. Since me and others have had their ironman games ruined at 300 years into the game which fucking sucks to be frank.
Seriously 1 save system is pretty bad. And yes I know there's a semi-extra but even when I sent it to your tech help the problem was still prevalent and they told me the game save was ruined.
Has there been added any sort of failsafe or backup-save system to the Ironman mode? Since this is a game that takes over 100hours to go from 800-1400th, and there is no backup, I would like to know. Since me and others have had their ironman games ruined at 300 years into the game which fucking sucks to be frank.
Seriously 1 save system is pretty bad. And yes I know there's a semi-extra but even when I sent it to your tech help the problem was still prevalent and they told me the game save was ruined.
I assume then that cultural buildings are now based off province culture and not liege culture?
Will your primary heir take off and adventure if he asks for a title and you tell him he's not ready? what with being groomed for kingship and whatnot.
- Will now keep attrition-free event troops mostly consolidated instead of spreading them out.
I don't like this at all, it's already annoying to deal with doomstack attritionless troops. There shouldn't be any attritionless troops at all.
I don't like this at all, it's already annoying to deal with doomstack attritionless troops. There shouldn't be any attritionless troops at all.
As some one who is quite computer ignorant i would just like to know if you will still be able to edit save games if using this option?
Yeah, you'll have to open the save with a zip software and extract the actual save data, then you can edit at will. Don't even have to put the new data into the archive to be able to load it.
Any plans in future patches to fix some of the issues left over from Sons of Abraham? In particular the big ones, like claimants in holy orders sometimes having their claims pushed or going adventuring, or holy orders being horrendously overpowered if Crusades get called early.
Not that I want to sound ungrateful I was sceptical about RoI to begin with but after all I've heard from the dev diaries and this thread, I'm really looking forward to it.
Not that I want to sound ungrateful
I was sceptical about RoI to begin with but after all I've heard from the dev diaries and this thread, I'm really looking forward to it.
- Status