Thank you. It seems that siege events do not happen anymore. Incredible :-(
Crusader Kings II ~ Quick Answers
- Thread starter unmerged(200028)
- Start date
-
We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
Thank you. It seems that siege events do not happen anymore. Incredible :-(
So just died aged 37 of poor health and my heir is my 2 year old son. Yes 14 years of nothing. Before I turn 3 I got a note from a vassal saying it's time to lower CA and because my regent supports it i have no choice but my regent wasn't in any factions was that right or a bug?
And it just fired again about 3 weeks later again without my regent being in any factions.
And it just fired again about 3 weeks later again without my regent being in any factions.
It's a bug, but since Paradox doesn't care about it you can consider it WAD.
It's a bug? I mean, the "regent's support" != faction membership. Regent support is something you have to have for declarations of war, marriages, AND refusing factions. I'm not saying the current rampant Crown Authority erosion in regencies is perfect, but I don't think this particular part that he stated is itself a bug.
Now the multi-lowering of Crown Authority? That, bug or not, seems at odds with most of the rest of the design around Crown Authority (raise once in a lifetime? A king who rules for 80 years should surely be able to do it twice if a regent can lower it 4 times in 2 years).
I think it fired and lowered the CA of a kingdom inside the empire but sicily Lombardy and Lombardia (Italia custom) are all limited so it fired again with no result?
I've also been getting 2 messages saying I'm your regent from different people whenever one is needed occasionally.
What you say would be the ideal result. If that's how it works now, that's an improvement over the past where it could indeed fire many times.
Unless your regent is changing, you shouldn't get messages about different regents and that would have to be a bug.
Got a quick question. Anyone know the exact rules for tribal vassals to upgrade these days? It's supposed to be automatic but some of my vassals still remain tribal. I've also got a vassal where only one of two counties upgraded.
I'm considering taking the Nomads out for a spin after I finish my current campaign, and have some preliminary notions of starting as a Nomad (Maybe Pechnegs?), using subjugation casus belli on the Byzantines to take over Constantinople and such, settling down as a 'usuper' dynasty and then going onto restore the Roman Empire. I am however unsure how the settling mechanics will work... can someone give me the 4-1-1 on how to do it?
Presumably I'll invade as much of Greece as possible, possibly educating my heir to be Greek Orthodox to avoid massive revolts upon settling, sieging down Constantinople and the richer provinces before peacing out and then... what?
Presumably I'll invade as much of Greece as possible, possibly educating my heir to be Greek Orthodox to avoid massive revolts upon settling, sieging down Constantinople and the richer provinces before peacing out and then... what?
Anything fuedal will be kept and depending on your manpower a lot of the land will become your culture/religion and you get i believe 1/3 your horde in light cav and horse archers.
- 1
In that case would it make sense to make use of everything OP about the Nomads and carve a bloody swathe through the Balkans, Italy and maybe some of Western Europe before settling?
Depends how easy you want settling to be. Me i just took anatolia and Constantinople leaving the ere okay so I had some rivals.
Though if you can take any land in Europe and move capital you can get heavy cav hordes which are all the bs.
- 1
Heavy cav hordes sound... extremely terrifying.
Put a Latin in charge of them, quite literally, and you'll tear through everything like wet paper.
Playing as the ere I inherited over vassal limit with no piety and I am wondering can I transfer non de jure dukes to vassal kings? It seems like I can't and I feel like it used to be possible.
I don't think it's possible. Counts you can assign to anyone but dukes? Hey, man, I'm not some lowly count, I'm a ruler in my own right! That joker ain't my ruler according to law, so screw you! I'd rather be an influential strategos than just the sub-vassal of an exarch.
Exarch, strategos ha I'm a fraticelli Lombard everybody fuedal. Influential is stretching it especially when they are viceroys I can just strip of title and give to content underling and even castrate them if the mood takes me.
So the thing with regents not in factions lowering CA 2 weeks into a regency then doing it again a week later just happened again so is this a bug they just won't fix? Because this is oh so very annoying.
Oh, my apologies. Still, they are dukes who are higher nobility.
Fair enough but when I'm emperor of 2 empires (if you count Italia idk technically it's basically the ere stretched but meh) I should be allowed to say you serve the king of Bulgaria be nice and try not to depose him.
I'm too dumb understand how commanders work.
I'm king level and can appoint 6 commanders... Yet I have about 45000 men and those six people are obviously not enough to lead all of my armies. I don't know which DLC or patch made it so that I can't appoint anybody I want anymore, but just having six people to choose from feels impossibly limited. How should this be actually working???
I'm king level and can appoint 6 commanders... Yet I have about 45000 men and those six people are obviously not enough to lead all of my armies. I don't know which DLC or patch made it so that I can't appoint anybody I want anymore, but just having six people to choose from feels impossibly limited. How should this be actually working???